The Protection of Fundamental Rights by the Constitutional Court in the Republic of Latvia. Perspectives, Opportunities and Limits of an Introduction of the Model in Italy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22364/jull.16.12Keywords:
fundamental rights, constitutional court, direct access, constitutional justice in the Republic of Latvia and in ItalyAbstract
The contribution aims to analyse the constitutional complaint in the Republic of Latvia, a particular type of appeal to the Constitutional Court that can be filed by an individual directly, without any intermediation, if a legal norm that conflicts with a hierarchically superordinate source has caused a violation of one of his or her fundamental rights provided for in the Constitution the Republic of Latvia of 15 February 1992 (Satversme). The objective will be to explore, also through the examination of constitutional jurisprudence, the adequacy of this technique of protecting fundamental rights in the Republic of Latvia, the possible development of the legal system through the referral to the Latvian Constitutional Court of issues that should have been dealt with by the legislature, and its exportability in the Italian legal system. With regard to this last profile, we will proceed to examine the obstacles to the introduction of some form of direct access to the Constitutional Court, represented not already by Article 134 of the Constitution (which, notoriously, provides for the jurisdiction of the constitutional court “over disputes relating to the constitutional legitimacy of laws and acts, having the force of law, of the State and the Regions”), but by Constitutional Law no. 1 of 1948 and Law No. 87 of 1953, which structure the control of constitutionality exclusively on incidental access (“in the course of a judgment”) and by the model of protection of fundamental rights outlined by the Constitution, in which the function of protection is attributed to the ordinary judge and, in cases of exclusive jurisdiction, to the administrative judge. Finally, special attention will be paid to the constitutional jurisprudence on election laws, which, according to some, would have legitimized the introduction in the national system of a direct appeal “disguised” as an incidental appeal.
References
AA.VV. I controlli sul potere [Power controls]. Firenze: Vallecchi, 1967.
Bin, R. Chi è il giudice dei diritti? Il modello costituzionale e alcune deviazioni [Who is the judge of rights? The constitutional model and some deviations]. Rivista AIC, Vol. 4, 2018.
Bottari, C. Prime osservazioni sul ricorso diretto di costituzionalità [First observations on the direct appeal of constitutionality]. Rivista trimestrale di diritto e procedura civile, 1977.
Carlassare, L. I diritti davanti alla Corte costituzionale: ricorso individuale o rilettura dell’art. 27 L. n. 87/1953? [Rights before the Constitutional Court: individual appeal or re-reading of art. 27 L. n. 87/1953?]. Diritto e società, 1997.
Dickmann, R. Le questioni all’attenzione del legislatore dopo la sentenza n. 35 del 2017 della Corte costituzionale [The issues to the attention of the legislator after the judgment No. 35 of 2017 of the Constitutional Court]. Dirittifondamentali.it, Vol. 1, 2017.
Gamper, A. The Constitutional Court of Austria. Modern Profiles of an Archetype of Constitutional Review. In: Constitutional Courts. A Comparative Study, Harding, A., Leyland, P. (eds). London: Wildy, 2009.
Glick, H. R. Courts, Politics and Justice, New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1988.
Groppi, T. Il ricorso di amparo costituzionale in Spagna: caratteri, problemi e prospettive [The appeal of constitutional amparo in Spain: characters, problems and perspectives]. Giurisprudenza costituzionale, Vol. 6, 1997.
Haberle, P. La Verfassungsbeschwerde nel sistema della giustizia costituzionale tedesca [The Verfassungsbeschwerde in the German constitutional justice system]. Milano: Giuffrè, 2000.
Hartwig, M. Il ricorso costituzionale individuale alla Corte Costituzionale tedesca [Individual constitutional appeal to the German Constitutional Court]. In: Patrimonio costituzionale europeo e tutela dei diritti fondamentali. Il ricorso diretto di costituzionalità [European constitutional heritage and protection of fundamental rights. The direct appeal of constitutionality], Tarchi, R. (ed.). Torino: Giappichelli, 2012.
Heringa, A. W. Constitutions Compared. An Introduction to Comparative Constitutional Law. Cambridge: Intersentia, 2016.
Lautenbach, G. The Concept of the Rule of Law and the European Court of Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.
Luciani, M. Bis in idem: La nuova sentenza della Corte costituzionale sulla legge elettorale politica [The new ruling of the Constitutional Court on the political electoral law]. Rivista AIC, Vol. 1, 2017.
Manfrellotti, R. Il rapporto di fiducia tra sistema elettorale e disciplina costituzionale [The relationship of trust between the electoral system and constitutional discipline]. Napoli: A. De Frede Editore, 2021.
Mesonis, G. Judicial Activism in the Context of Jurisprudence of the Constitutional Court. In: Judicial Activism of a Constitutional Court in a Democratic State, Constitutional Court of the Republic of Latvia, 2016.
Mezzanotte, C. Il giudizio sulle leggi. I. Le ideologie del Costituente [The judgment on the laws. I. The ideologies of the Constituent Assembly]. Milano: Giuffrè, 1979.
Nicotra Guerrera, I. Giudizio sulle leggi e accesso del privato di fronte all’art. 24 Cost. [Judgment on the laws and access of the private before Art. 24 Const.] In: Il contraddittorio nel giudizio sulle leggi (Atti del seminario di Milano svoltosi il 16 e 17 maggio 1997) [The contradictory in the judgment on the laws (Proceedings of the Milan seminar held on 16–May 1997), Angiolini, V. (ed). Torino: Giappichelli, 1998.
Osipova, S. Tiesiska valsts vai “tiesnešu valsts”. Jurista Vārds, Vol. 27, 2016.
Prochazka, R. Mission Accomplished. On Founding Constitutional Adjudication in Central Europe. Budapest-New York: Central European University Press, 2002.
Rodiņa, A. Constitutional Court as a guardian of the Latvian legal system. Strani pravni život, Vol. 4, 2021.
Rodiņa, A. Konstitucionālās sūdzības teorija un prakse Latvijā. Rīga: Latvijas Vēstnesis, 2009.
Rodiņa, A., Spale, A. The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Latvia as a law-maker. Current practice. In: Judicial Law-Making in European Constitutional Courts, Florczak-Wątor, M. (eds). London and New York: Routledge, 2020.
Romboli R. Il giudizio costituzionale incidentale come processo senza parti [Incidental constitutional judgment as a trial without parties]. Napoli: Editoriale Scientifica, 1985.
Romboli, R. L’incostituzionalità dell’«Italicum»: la Consulta conferma il superamento della storica «zona franca» delle leggi elettorali, ma anche la creazione di una nuova per le leggi costituzionalmente necessarie [The unconstitutionality of the «Italicum»: the Consulta confirms the overcoming of the historic «free zone» of electoral laws, but also the creation of a new one for constitutionally necessary laws]. Foro Italiano, Parte I, 2017.
Romboli, R. La giustizia costituzionale nel progetto della Bicamerale [Constitutional justice in the Bicameral project]. Diritto pubblico, 1997, p. 833.
Romboli, R., Tarchi, R. La giustizia costituzionale in Spagna [Constitutional justice in Spain]. In: Esperienze di giustizia costituzionale [Experiences of constitutional justice], Luther, J., Romboli, R., Tarchi, R. (eds). Vol. II, Torino: Giappichelli, 2000.
Ruggeri, A. La Corte alla sofferta ricerca di un equilibrio tra le ragioni della rappresentanza e quelle della governabilità: un’autentica quadratura del cerchio, riuscita però solo a metà nella pronunzia sull’Italicum [The Court in the painful search for a balance between the reasons of representation and those of governability: an authentic squaring of the circle, but only half successful in the pronouncement on Italicum]. www.forumcostituzionale.it, 25 febbraio 2017.
Scavone, A. Appunti sulle proposte di introduzione del ricorso costituzionale diretto in Italia [Notes on the proposals for the introduction of direct constitutional redress in Italy]. Rivista trimestrale di diritto e procedura civile, 1981.
Schwartz, H. The Struggle for Constitutional Justice in Post-Communist Europe, Chicago-London: The University of Chicago Press, 2000.
Solyom, L. The Rise and Decline of Constitutional Culture in Hungary. In: Constitutional Crisis in the European Constitutional Area: Theory, Law and Politics in Hungary and Romania. Von Bogdandy, A., Sonnevend, P. (eds). Oxford-Portland: Hart Publishing, 2015.
Sweet, A. S. Governing with Judges. Constitutional Politics in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.
Tirio, F. «Maschera» e «volto» del ricorso individuale di costituzionalità [«Mask» and «face» of individual appeal of constitutionality]. In: Il diritto costituzionale a duecento anni dall’istituzione della prima cattedra in Europa (Atti del Convegno di Ferrara, 2–3 maggio 1997) [Constitutional law two hundred years after the establishment of the first chair in Europe (Proceedings of the Ferrara Conference, 2–3 May 1997)], Carlassare, P. (ed.). Padova: Cedam, 1998.
Weber, R. Law-making activity of the German Federal Constitutional Court. A case-law study. In: Judicial Law-Making in European Constitutional Courts, Florczak-Wątor, M. (ed.). London and New York: Routledge, 2020.
Code of Civil Procedure (28.10.1940), Art. 100. Available: https://www.normattiva.it/uri-res/N2Ls?urn:nir:stato:regio.decreto:1940-10-28;1443 [last viewed: 25.08.2023].
Italian Constitution (01.01.1948). Available: https://www.senato.it/istituzione/la-costituzione [last viewed 25.08.2023].
Law No. 117, of 13 April 1988, No. 117 – “Compensation for damages caused in the exercise of judicial functions and civil liability of magistrates”. Available: https://www.normattiva.it/uri-res/N2Ls?urn:nir:stato:legge:1988-04-13;117 [last viewed: 14.07.2023].
Constitutional Law No. 1, of 9 February 1948 – “Rules on judgments of constitutionality and guarantees of independence of the Constitutional Court” (09.02.1948). Available: https://www.normattiva.it/uri-res/N2Ls?urn:nir:stato:legge.costituzionale:1948;1 [last viewed: 25.08.2023].
Law No. 87, of 11 March 1953 – “Rules on the constitution and operation of the Constitutional Court” (11.03.1953). Available: https://www.normattiva.it/uri-res/N2Ls?urn:nir:stato:legge:1953-03-11;87 [last viewed: 25.08.2023].
Latvijas Republikas Satversme [The Constitution of the Republic of Latvia] (15.02.1922). Available: http://saeima.lv/en/about-saeima/work-of-the-saeima/constitution/ [last viewed 25.08.2023].
Likums “Par nekustamā īpašuma piespiedu atsavināšanu valsts vai sabiedriskajām vajadzībām” [Law “On Coercive Expropriation of Real Estate for State or Public Needs”] (15.09.1992). Available: https://likumi.lv/ta/id/66329-par-nekustama-ipasuma-piespiedu-atsavinasanunbspvalsts-vai-sabiedriskajam-vajadzibam [last viewed: 25.08.2023].
Ministru kabineta noteikumi Nr. 423, gada 30. maijā – “Brīvības atņemšanas iestādes iekšējās kārtības noteikumi” [Regulations of the Cabinet of Ministers No. 423, of 30 May 2006 – “Regulation of the Internal Procedure of the Deprivation of Liberty Institution”] (30.05.2006). Available: https://likumi.lv/ta/id/136495-brivibas-atnemsanas-iestades-ieksejas-kartibas-noteikumi [last viewed: 25.08.2023].
Ministru kabineta noteikumi No. 847, gada 1. novembrī – Grozījumi Ministru kabineta 2006. gada 30. maija noteikumos No. 423 “Brīvības atņemšanas iestādes iekšējās kārtības noteikumi” [Regulations of the Cabinet of Ministers No. 847, of 1 November 2011 – “Amendments to the Cabinet of Ministers Regulation No. 423 of 30 May 2006 “Internal Regulation of the Imprisonment Institution””].
Satversmes tiesas likums [Constitutional Court Law] (05.06.1996). Available: https://likumi.lv/ta/en/en/id/63354 [last viewed 25.08.2023].
Satversmes tiesas reglaments [Rules of Procedure of the Constitutional Court] (05.02.2014). Available: https://likumi.lv/ta/id/264317-satversmes-tiesas-reglaments [last viewed 25.08.2023].
Judgement of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Latvia of 8 May 1997 in case No. 04-01(97).
Judgement of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Latvia of 11 March 1998 in case No. 04-05(97).
Order of Constitutional Court of 5 February 1999 in case No. 17.
Judgement of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Latvia of 22 February 2002 in case No. 2001-06-03.
Judgement of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Latvia of 26 November 2002 in case No. 2002-09-01.
Judgement of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Latvia of 23 April 2003 in case No. 2002-20-0103.
Judgement of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Latvia of 23 October 2007 in case No. 2007-03-01.
Judgement of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Latvia of 7 April 2009, in case No. 2008-35-01.
Judgement of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Latvia of 21 December 2009 in case No. 2009-43-01.
Judgement of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Latvia of 18 January 2010, in case No. 2009-11-01.
Judgement of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Latvia of 30 December 2010 in case No. 2010-38-01.
Judgement of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Latvia of 12 November 2015 in case No. 2015-06-01.
Judgment of the Italian Constitutional Court of 9 February 2017 in case No. 35.
Judgement of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Latvia of 10 February 2017 in case No. 2016-06-01.
Judgement of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Latvia of 8 April 2021 in case No. 2020-34-03.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 University of Latvia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
