Several Aspects of the Protection of Trade Secrets
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22364/jull.15.16Keywords:
trade secrets, intellectual property, know-how, tort, employment relationship, employer, employee, restriction of competition, non-competition agreementAbstract
The present article contains a discussion of several aspects important for the protection of trade secrets. It provides analysis of certain facets of trade secret, definition, for instance, the meaning of commercial value of keeping the information secret. This article also views the scope of the duty of an employer to inform his employees about the trade secret status of the respective information and provides a suggestion about interpretation and exemption from this duty. In addition, this article also examines the mental element of infringer as precondition of his liability, as well as the meaning of non-competition agreements between the employers and employees as a tool for protection from trade secret infringements.
References
De Carvalho, P. The TRIPS Regime of Antitrust and Undisclosed Information. The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2008, 223 ff. Quoted from: Suosa e Silva N. What exactly is a trade secret under the proposed directive? Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, Vol. 9, No. 11, 2014, p. 929.
Ebenroth, C., Boujong, C., Joost, D., Strohn, J. Handelsgesetzbuch. Band 2. §§ 343–475h, Transportrecht, Bank und Börsenrecht, 4. Auflage 2020. München: C. H. Beck, 2020, HGB § 347.
Gulbis, R. Komercnoslēpuma aizsardzības priekšnosacījumi, nelikumīga iegūšana, izmantošana un izpaušana [Preconditions of Trade Secret Protection, Illegal Acquisition, Use and Disclosure]. Jurista Vārds, 12.10.2021., Nr.41 (1203), pp. 7–17.
Grassie, G. Trade Secrets: The New EU Enforcement Regime. Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, Vol. 9, No. 8., 2014.
Hau, W., Poseck, R. BeckOK BGB. 56th edition. München: C. H. Beck, 2020, BGB § 823.
Niebel, R., de Martinis, L., Clark, B. The EU Trade Secrets Directive: all change for trade secret protection in Europe? Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, Vol. 13, Issue 6, June 2018.
Kārkliņa, A. Restriction of Competition After Termination of Employment Relationships. Journal of the University of Latvia. Law, No. 14, Riga: University of Latvia, 2021, pp. 159–183. Available: https://www.apgads.lu.lv/fileadmin/user_upload/lu_portal/apgads/PDF/Juridiska-zinatne_Law/Juridiska-zinatne-14/Jurid-zin-14_.pdf [last viewed 10.04.2022].
Rācenājs, K. Komercnoslēpums darba tiesiskajās attiecībās [Trade Secret in Labour Relations]. Jurista Vārds, Nr. 41 (1203), 12.10.2021., pp. 33–37.
Säcker, F. J., Rixecker, R., Oetker, H., Limpberg, B. Münchener Kommentar zum Bürgerlichen Gesetzbuch. München: Verlag C. H. Beck, 2020, BGB § 280.
Suosa e Silva, N. What exactly is a trade secret under the proposed directive? Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, Vol. 9, No. 11, 2014.
Tripathi, S. Treating trade secrets as property: A jurisprudential inquiry in search of coherency. Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, Vol. 11, Issue 11, November 2016.
Turner, S. Knowledge a key factor for liability for trade secrets misuse. Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, Vol. 8, No. 10, 2013.
Van Caenegem, W. Trade Secret and Intellectual Property. Breach of Confidence, Misapproproation and Unfair Competition. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International, 2014.
Varadarajan, D. Trade Secret Precautions, Possession and Notice. Hastings Law Journal, Vol. 68, No. 2, February 2017.
Wish, R., Bailey, R. Competition Law. 8th edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.
Wright, C. A. Gross Negligence. University of Toronto Law Journal, Vol. XXXIII. University of Toronto Press, 1983.
Communication from the Commission – Guidelines on the applicability of Article 101 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union to horizontal co-operation agreements. OJ C 11, 14.01.2011, pp. 1–72.
Directive (EU) 2016/943 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2016 on the protection of undisclosed know-how and business information (trade secrets) against their unlawful acquisition, use and disclosure. OJ L 157, 15.06.2016, pp. 1–18.
Darba likums [Labour Law] (20.06.2001). Available: https://likumi.lv/ta/en/en/id/26019-labour-law [last viewed 10.04.2022].
Gesetz zum Schutz von Geschäftsgeheimnissen [Trade Secret Protection Law]. Available: http://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/geschgehg/BJNR046610019.html [last viewed 26.03.2022].
Komercnoslēpuma aizsardzības likums [Trade Secret Protection Law] (28.02.2019.). Available: https://likumi.lv/ta/en/en/id/305532-trade-secret-protection-law [last viewed 27.02.2022].
Learning Curve Toys Incorporated v. Playwood Toys Incorporated, 342 F 3d 714 (7th Cir. 2003) para. 38. Quoted from: Suosa e Silva, N. What exactly is a trade secret under the proposed directive? Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, Vol. 9, No 11, 2014, p. 930.
Oberlandesgericht Bremen, Urteil vom 17.08.2004. – 3 U 103/03 [Bremen Higher Court. Judgement from 17 August 2004 in case 3 U 103/03].
Vestergaard Frandsen A/S (now MVF 3 ApS) and others v. Bestnet Europe Limited and others [2013] UKSC 31, United Kingdom Supreme Court, 22 May 2013, para 26. Available: https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/docs/uksc-2011-0144-judgment.pdf [last viewed 03.04.2022].
Latvijas Republikas Augstākās tiesas Civillietu departamenta 2015. gada 27. februāra spriedums lietā Nr. SKC-0008/2015, 11.3.2. punkts, 15. lpp. [Judgment in the case No. SKC-0008/2015 of the Civil Department of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Latvia of 27 February, 2015, point 11.3.2., page 15]. Unpublished.
Latvijas Republikas Augstākās tiesas Senāta Administratīvo lietu departamenta 2021. gada 15. februāra spriedums lietā SKA-54/2021, 2.4. punkts, 3. lpp. [Judgment in the case No. SKA-54/2021 of the Administrative Department of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Latvia of 15 February, 2021, point 2.4, page 3] Available in Latvian: https://www.at.gov.lv/lv/tiesu-prakse/judikaturas-nolemumu-arhivs/administrativo-lietu-departaments/klasifikators-pec-lietu-kategorijam/konkurences-tiesibas [last viewed 22.03.2022].
Konkurences padomes 2014. gada 24. oktobra lēmums Nr. E02-55 lietā p/13/03.01./2, 14. lpp. [Decision No. E02-55 in case No. p/13/03.01./2 of the Competition Council of 24 October, 2014, p. 14]. Available: https://lemumi.kp.gov.lv/files/lemumu_pielikumi/GXFkq7zw7v.pdf [last viewed 22.03.2022].
Annotation of the draft Trade Secret Protection Law. Available: http://tap.mk.gov.lv/lv/mk/tap/?dateFrom=2018-03-22&dateTo=2022-03-22&text=Komercnosl%C4%93puma&org=0&area=0&type=0 [last viewed 22.03.2022].
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
