Liability for Unlawful Use of a Trademark

Authors

  • Jānis Rozenfelds University of Latvia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22364/jull.15.12

Keywords:

counterfeit, fault, liability, license, trademark

Abstract

The aim of this report is to provide a brief overview of litigation over trademark violations from 2014 until 2019. This period is significant for at least two reasons: first, the beginning of this period coincides with a decade since the accession of several East European countries, including Latvia, to the European Union; second, the end of this period coincides with the end of application of the Law On Trademarks and Indications of Geographical Origin of 1999, which was replaced by a new law enacted on 6 March 2020. The procedure for the opposition process as part of trademark registration was reformed as the Law on Industrial Property Institutions and Procedures came into force on 1 January 2016. Although reform of trademark registration and the opposition procedure did not have a direct impact on trademark rights already in place, it could be anticipated that protection of trademark rights as established since 2016 would be more robust and the peculiarities of the previous period would be extinguished. As litigation over the registration and opposition procedure lags behind the filing of applications for registration of trademarks, no cases have been heard over applications filed under the new system, i.e., after 1 January 2016.

Author Biography

  • Jānis Rozenfelds, University of Latvia

    Dr. iur. 
    Faculty of Law, University of Latvia
    Professor at the Department of Civil Law Sciences

References

Abdussalam, M. Reining in the rules for “lost profits” damages in patent law. Queen Mary Journal of Intellectual Property, Vol. 9, No. 4, 2019, pp. 366–367. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/qmjip.2019.04.01

Brants, E. Role of foreseeability in imposition of civil liability. Socrates (Journal of electronic articles on legal science of Rīga Stradiņš University), No. 2 (20), 2021, pp. 268–286. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25143/socr.20.2021.2.268-286

Pētersone, Z. Legal remedies for the protection of intellectual property (in Latvian). TNA, 2013.

Philips, J. Trade Mark Law. A Practical Anatomy. Oxford University Press, 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199267965.001.0001

Rasnačs, L. The role of fault in implementation of the liability for violations of the ban of unfair competition. Collection of articles of the 69th Conference of the University of Latvia (in Latvian), 2011.

Rozenfelds, J. Intelektuālais īpašums. Otrais, labotais un papildinātais izdevums [Intellectual property. Second, amended and supplemented edition]. Riga, 2008.

Rozenfelds, J. The Concept of Property and intellectual Property in Latvia. Juridiskā Zinātne [Journal of Legal Science. University of Latvia], No. 1, 2010 (In Latvian).

Rozenfelds, J., Mantrovs, V. Is a National Court Competent to Introduce a Disclaimer into a Trade Mark Registration? The Latvian Supreme Court Finally Says ‘No’. GRUR International, Vol. 70, No. 8, 2021, pp. 760–763. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/grurint/ikab084

Yo Sop Choi. Standard essential patents – a comparison of approaches between East and West. Queen Mary Journal of Intellectual Property, Vol. 8, No.4, 2018, pp. 313–332. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/qmjip.2018.04.03

Directive 2004/48/EK.

Directive 2015/2436/EK.

Council Regulation (EC) No. 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark.

Council Regulation (EC) No. 3295/94.

Council Regulation (EC) No. 1383/2003 of 22 July 2003.

Council Regulation (EC) No. 1992/2003 of 27 October 2003 amending Regulation (EC) No. 40/94 on the Community trade mark (OJ 2003 L 296.

Civil Law (01.09.1992). Available: https://likumi.lv/ta/en/en/id/225418-civil-law [last viewed 22.02.2022].

Civil Procedure Law (01.03.1999). Available: https://likumi.lv/ta/en/en/id/50500-civil-procedure-law [last viewed 22.02.2022].

Law on Industrial Property Institutions and Procedures (01.01.2016). Available: https://likumi.lv/ta/en/en/id/275049-law-on-industrial-property-institutions-and-procedures [last viewed 22.02.2022].

Law On Trade Marks and Indications of Geographical Origin (15.07.1999, end of validity 06.03.2020). Available: https://likumi.lv/ta/en/en/id/18863 [last viewed 22.02.2022].

Law “On Trademarks” (06.03.2020). Available in Latvian: https://likumi.lv/ta/id/312695-precu-zimju-likums [last viewed 22.02.2022].

Latvijas Republikas Ministru Padomes lēmums Nr. 72 [Regulation No. 72 of the Council of Ministers of 28 February 1992]. Ziņotājs, Nr. 17, 1992.

Judgement by the Supreme Court Senate on 9 December 2015 in case No. SKC-96/2015.

Judgement by the Supreme Court Senate on 30 October 2015 in case No. C04375909.

Judgement by the Supreme Court Senate on 13 October 2016 in case No. C 04502510.

Judgement by the Supreme Court Senate on 4 June 2018 in case No. C04292106.

Judgement by the Supreme Court Senate on 4 June 2018 in case No. C04494311.

Judgement by the Supreme Court Senate on 21 April 2016 in case No. C04366712.

Judgement by the Riga Regional Court on 3 February 2016 in case No. C04181114.

Judgement by the Riga Regional Court on 18th January 2017 in case No. C 04502510

Judgement by the Riga Regional Court on 15 February 2019 in case C30618416.

Judgement by the Riga Regional Court on 4 October 2019 in case No. C04494311.

Judgement by the Riga Regional Court on 6 March 2015 in case No. 132059413.

Judgement by the Riga Regional Court on 28 November 2016 in case No. 133089415.

Judgement by the Zemgale Regional Court on 21 June 2017 in case No. 11120115906.

Judgement by the Kurzeme Regional Court on 30 November 2015 in case No. 11270014514.

Judgement by the Regional Administrative Court on 3 September 2014 in case No. A420674510.

Judgement by the Regional Administrative Court on 18 January 2018 in case No. 1A29011318.

Judgement by the Riga Court of Vidzeme suburb on 14 June 2018 in case No. C30693118.

Judgement by the Riga Court of Vidzeme suburb on 26 May 2015 in case No. 130037115.

Judgement by the Riga Court of Vidzeme suburb on 14 June 2018 in case No. C30693118.

Judgement by the Riga Court of Latgale suburb on 10 February 2017 in case No. 129046216.

Judgement by the Daugavpils City Court on 19 February 2018 in case No. 11816008617.

Judgement by the Rezekne City Court on 22 June 2017 in case No. 1A26001417.

Downloads

Published

2022-11-16

How to Cite

Rozenfelds, J. (2022). Liability for Unlawful Use of a Trademark. Journal of the University of Latvia. Law, 15, 176-191. https://doi.org/10.22364/jull.15.12