General Principles of Law as Common Constitutional Traditions of the European Union Member States
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22364/jull.15.10Keywords:
general principles of law, common constitutional traditions, Basic Norm, constitutional identity, valuesAbstract
The article examines the notion of “common constitutional traditions” of the European Union Member States looking for the content of this open-ended term. It is agreed and even on the international level that fundamental rights are the part of the common constitutional traditions, but in this article, it is suggested to connect the notion with the notion of the general principles of law thus obtaining more comprehensive and elaborate understanding of what the content of the common constitutional traditions really involve. General principles of law are a common source of law to all the legal arrangements of the European Union Member States as they are derived from the same Basic Norm – democratic state based on the Rule of Law, and fundamental rights are only one part of the general principles of law as they are much wider notion. That is why looking from the perspective of the general principles of law as common source of law of all the legal arrangements based on the Basic Norm – democratic state based on the Rule of Law common constitutional traditions besides the human rights involve also legal methods and those general principles of law which govern the system requirements for the legal arrangement.
References
Alchourron, C. E., Bulygin, E. The Expressive Conception of Norms. In: Normativity and Norms. Critical Perspectives on Kelsenian Themes, Paulson, S. L. (ed.). Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1999.
Cafaggi, F., Moraru, M., Casarose, F., Fontanelli, F., Lazzerini, N., Mataija, M., Martinico, G., Podstawa, K., Pitea, C., Perez, A. Final Handbook Judicial Interaction Techniques – Their potential and use in European Fundamental Rights Adjudication. Fiesole: Centre for Judicial Cooperation, 2014. Available: http://pak.hr/cke/pdf%20eng/JUDCOOP%20Final%20Handbook%20-%20Use% 20of% 20Judicial% 20Interaction % 20Techniques%20in%20the%20field%20of%20EFRs.pdf [last viewed 10.04.2022].
Fichera, M., Pollicino, O. The Dialectics Between Constitutional Identity and Common Constitutional Traditions: Which Language for Cooperative Constitutionalism in Europe? German Law Journal, 20, 2019.
Freeman, M. D. A. Introduction to Jurisprudence. Sweet & Maxwell ltd., London, 1994.
Jacobson, G. J. Constitutional Values and Principles. In: The Oxford Handbook of the Comparative Constitutional Law. Rosenfeld, M., Sajo, A. (eds). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.
Kelsen, H. Introduction to the Problems of Legal Theory. A Translation of the First Edition of the Reine Rechtslehre or Pure Theory of Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2002.
Lachmayer, K. The Constitution of Austria in International Constitutional Networks: Pluralism, Dialogues and Diversity. In: National Constitutions in European and Global Governance: Democracy, Rights, the Rule of Law, Albi, A., Bardutzky, S. (eds). The Hague: Asser Press, 2019.
Morton, P. An Institutional Theory of Law: Keeping Law in Its Place. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998.
Pleps, J. Baltijas valstu konstitucionālā identitāte [Constitutional Identity of the Baltic States]. Jurista Vārds, Nr. 34, 2016.
Pleps, J. Normatīvo tiesību aktu hierarhija: profesors Hanss Kelsens un mūsdienas (I) [The Hierarchy of Acts of Legal Norms: Professor Hans Kelsen and the Present Day]. Likums un Tiesības, Nr. 2, 2007.
Rezevska, D. Ideology, Values, Legal Norms and Constitutional Court. In: The second collection of research papers in conjunction with the 6th International Scientific Conference of the Faculty of Law of the University of Latvia “Constitutional Values in Contemporary Legal Space II”. Riga: University of Latvia, 2017.
Rezevska, D. Legal Methods in Latvia’s Legal Arrangement and European Integration. In: “European Integration and Baltic Sea Region: Diversity and Perspectives”. Collection of Papers of International Conference held by the University of Latvia. Riga: The University of Latvia Press, 2011.
Rezevska, D. Vispārējo tiesību principu nozīme un piemērošana [The Meaning and Application of General Principles of Law]. Rīga: D. Rezevskas izd., 2015.
Rijpkema, B. Militant Democracy. The Limits of Democratic Tolerance. New York: Routledge, 2018.
Sniedzīte, G. Tiesību normu iztulkošana praeter legem I, II, III [Interpretation of the Legal Norms Using Praeter Legem Method]. Likums un Tiesības, Nr. 10, Nr. 11, Nr. 12, 2005.
Šulcs, L. Dabisko tiesību jēdziens [The Meaning of Natural Law]. Jurists, Nr. 1/2, 1937.
Weinberger, O. The Expressive Conception of Norms: An Impasse for the Logic of Norms. In: Normativity and Norms: Critical Perspective on Kelsenian Themes, Paulson, S. L. (ed.). Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1999.
The Treaty on European Union. Available: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/resource.html?uri=cellar:2bf140bf-a3f8-4ab2-b506-fd71826e6da6.0023.02/DOC_1&format=PDF [last viewed 10.04.2022].
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. Available: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:12012P/TXT [last viewed 10.04.2022].
CJEU, Joined Cases C-7/56, 3/57 to 7/57, Algera v. Common Assembly of ECSC, ECLI:EU:C:1957:7.
CJEU, Internationale Handelsgesellschaft mbH v. Einfuhr- und Vorratsstelle für Getreide und Futtermittel, C-11/70, EU:C:1970:114.
CJEU, Judgment of 14 October 2004, Omega, C-36/02, EU:C:2004:614.
Judgement of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Latvia in case No. 2020-39-02 on 4 June 2021.
Judgement of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Latvia in case No. 2018-11-01 on 6 March 2019.
Decision of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Latvia in case No. 2016-03-01 on 21 October 2016.
Judgement of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Latvia in case No. 2008-35-01 on 7 April 2009.
Report on the Rule of Law. European Commission for Democracy through Law (Venice Commission). Adopted by the Venice Commission at its 86th plenary session (Venice, 25–26 March 2011). Available: https://www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/default.aspx?pdffile=CDL-AD(2011)003rev-e [last viewed 10.04.2022].
Par Latvijas valsts konstitucionālajiem pamatiem un neaizskaramo Satversmes kodolu [On the Constitutional Foundations of the State of Latvia and the Inviolable Core of the Constitution. Opinion of the Constitutional Law Commission]. 17 September 2012. Available: http://blogi.lu.lv/tzpi/files/2017/03/17092012_Viedoklis_2.pdf [last viewed 07.04.2022].
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
