Corporate Prosecutions – on Some Relevant Issues Related to the Criminal Procedural Status of Legal Entities

Authors

  • Kristīne Strada-Rozenberga University of Latvia
  • Ārija Meikališa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22364/jull.15.02

Keywords:

corporate criminal liability, corporate prosecutions, procedural coercive measures, legal entities and “human rights”

Abstract

The article is dedicated to the issues related to corporate prosecution, which the authors see as relevant. The two main lines explored herein are the applicability of human rights to legal entities and the possibility of using procedural (preventive, security coercive measures during the proceedings. The outcomes of researching the currently valid regulatory enactments and those that have become void, examples of law application and theoretical sources are used to present the authors’ perspective on the most important aspects of the respective issues, problems are foregrounded and proposals are advanced to facilitate further discussion.

Author Biographies

Kristīne Strada-Rozenberga, University of Latvia

Dr. iur. 
Faculty of Law, University of Latvia
Professor at the Criminal Law Science Department

Ārija Meikališa

Dr. iur.
Faculty of Law, University of Latvia
Professor at the Criminal Law Science Department

References

Baumanis, J. Prevencija piespiedu ietekmēšanas līdzekļu piemērošanas kontekstā [Prevention in the Context of Applying Coercive Measures]. Jurista vārds, Nr. 32 (834), 19.08.2014. Available: https://juristavards.lv/doc/265004-prevencija-piespiedu-ietekmesanas-lidzeklu-piemerosanas-konteksta/ [last viewed 01.05.2022].

Brodowski, D. et al. Regulating Corporate Criminal Liability. Springer International Publishing Switzerland, 2014.

Edecapitani. Presumption of Innocence and the Right to be Present at Trial: The Meijers Committee’s (*) position, 12.12.2014. Available: https://free-group.eu/2014/12/12/presumption-of-innocence-and-the-right-to-be-present-at-trial-the-meijers-committees-position/ [last viewed 01.05.2022].

Isiksel, T. The Rights of Man and the Rights of the Man-Made: Corporations and Human Rights. Human Rights Quarterly, Vol. 38, No. 2, 2016, pp. 297–298., 315. Project MUSE, doi:10.1353/hrq.2016.0031 [last viewed 01.05.2022].

Lamberigts, S. The presumption of innocence (and the right to be present at trial) directive. 03.05.2016. Available: http://europeanlawblog.eu/?p=3192 [last viewed 01.05.2022].

Krastiņš, U. Kriminālsods un citi kriminālie piespiedu ietekmēšanas līdzekļi [Criminal Punishment and Other Criminal Coercive Measures]. Jurista vārds, Nr.11(464), 2007. Available: https://juristavards.lv/doc/154290-kriminalsods-un-citi-kriminalie-piespiedu-ietekmesanas-lidzekli/ [last viewed 01.05.2022].

Krastiņš, U. Konceptuāli par vainu administratīvajās tiesībās [Conceptually about Guilt in Administrative Law]. Jurista vārds, Nr. 23(476), 2007. Available: https://juristavards.lv/doc/158182-konceptuali-par-vainu-administrativajas-tiesibas/ [last viewed 01.05.2022].

Krastiņš, U. Konceptuāli par juridisko personu kriminālatbildību [Conceptually about Corporate Criminal Liability]. Jurista vārds, Nr. 33(338), 2004. Available: https://juristavards.lv/doc/92916-konceptuali-par-juridisko-personu-kriminalatbildibu/ [last viewed 01.05.2022].

Meikališa, Ā. Mantiskie preventīvie piespiedu līdzekļi kriminālprocesā – atsevišķi piemērošanas problēmjautājumi. Ārvalsts investīcijas: kad tiesības mijiedarbojas [Property-based preventive coercive means in criminal proceedings – certain problematic issues of application. Foreign investment: When laws interact]. Latvijas Universitātes 74. zinātniskās konferences rakstu krājums. Rīga: LU Akadēmiskais apgāds, 2016.

Meikališa, Ā. Preventīvo piespiedu līdzekļu piemērošana juridiskām personām kriminālprocesā [Application of preventive coercive measures to legal entities in criminal proceedings]. In: Autoru kolektīvs, Juridisko personu publiski tiesiskā atbildība: aktualitātes, problēmas un iespējamie risinājumi. Rīga: LU Akadēmiskais apgāds, 2018. Available: https://www.apgads.lu.lv/fileadmin/user_upload/lu_portal/apgads/izdevumi/2018/Jurid.pers.publiski_tiesiska_atbild.pdf [last viewed 01.05.2022].

Rozenbergs, J., Strada-Rozenberga, K. Krimināltiesiskie piespiedu ietekmēšanas līdzekļi juridiskām personām, to piemērošanas process un tā aktuālās problēmas Latvijas kriminālprocesā [Criminal Procedural Coercive Measures for Legal Entities, the Procedure of Application thereof and Related Relevant Problems in Latvian Criminal Procedure]. In: Juridisko personu publiski tiesiskā atbildība. Rīga: Latvijas Vēstnesis, 2018. Available: https://www.apgads.lu.lv/fileadmin/user_upload/lu_portal/apgads/izdevumi/2018/Jurid.pers.publiski_tiesiska_atbild.pdf [last viewed 01.05.2022].

Sayers, D. The new Directive on the presumption of innocence: protecting the ‘golden thread’. 2015. Available: http://eulawanalysis.blogspot.com/2015/11/the-new-directive-on-presumption-of.html [last viewed 01.05.2022].

Shiner, R. A. Corporations and the Presumption of Innocence. Criminal Law, Philosophy, 8, 2014. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11572-013-9287-9 [last viewed 01.05.2022].

Strada-Rozenberga, K. Piespiedu ietekmēšanas līdzekļu juridiskām personām piemērošanas process un tā aktuālās problēmas Latvijas kriminālprocesā. In: Meikališa, Ā., Strada-Rozenberga, K. Kriminālprocess. Raksti 2010–2015. Rīga: Latvijas Vēstnesis, 2015.

Strada-Rozenberga, K. Juridiskā persona un nevainīguma prezumpcija kriminālprocesā [Legal Person and Presumption of Innocence in Criminal Procedure]. In: Constitutional Values in Contemporary Legal Space I: Collection of Research Papers in Conjunction with the 6th International Scientific Conference of the Faculty of Law of the University of Latvia. 2016. gada 16.–17. novembris. Rīga: LU Akadēmiskais apgāds, 2016.

Strada-Rozenberga, K. Piespiedu ietekmēšanas līdzekļu piemērošana juridiskajām personām. Tiesu prakses (2015–2020) apkopojums [Application of Coercive Measures to Legal Entities. Digest of Case-Law (2015–2020)]. Rīga, 2020. Available: https://2a6c95cf-045b-40e7-840c-f4bd65b3ede4.usrfiles.com/ugd/2a6c95_bf620c60bf484b45a50c3f0dd444e6fd.pdf [last viewed 01.05.2022].

Treshel, S. Human Rights in Criminal Proceedings. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.

Directive (EU) 2016/343 on the strengthening of certain aspects of the presumption of innocence and of the right to be present at the trial in criminal proceedings (09.03.2016). Available: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2016/343/oj [last viewed 01.05.2022].

Krimināllikums [Criminal Law]. (17.06.1998.). The text of law currently in force available: https://likumi.lv/ta/id/88966-kriminallikums [last viewed 01.05.2022].

Grozījumi Krimināllikumā [Amendments to the Criminal Law]. (05.05.2005.) Available: https://www.vestnesis.lv/ta/id/108851-grozijumi-kriminallikuma [last viewed 01.05.2022].

Kriminālprocesa likums [Criminal Procedure Law]. (21.04.2005). The text of law currently in force: https://likumi.lv/ta/id/107820-kriminalprocesa-likums [last viewed 01.05.2022].

Grozījumi Kriminālprocesa likumā [Amendments to the Criminal Procedure Law]. (12.03.2009.). Available: https://likumi.lv/ta/id/190010-grozijumi-kriminalprocesa-likuma [last viewed 01.05.2022].

Grozījumi Kriminālprocesa likumā [Amendments to the Criminal Procedure Law]. (14.03.2013.). Available: https://likumi.lv/ta/id/255728-grozijumi-kriminalprocesa-likuma [last viewed 01.05.2022].

Grozījumi Kriminālprocesa likumā [Amendments to the Criminal Procedure Law]. (29.05.2014.) Available: https://likumi.lv/ta/id/266815-grozijumi-kriminalprocesa-likuma [last viewed 01.05.2022].

Grozījumi Kriminālprocesa likumā [Amendments to the Criminal Procedure Law]. (18.02.2016.) Available: https://likumi.lv/ta/id/280784-grozijumi-kriminalprocesa-likuma [last viewed 01.05.2022].

Grozījumi Kriminālprocesa likumā [Amendments to the Criminal Procedure Law]. (30.03.2017.). Available: https://likumi.lv/ta/id/290109-grozijumi-kriminalprocesa-likuma [last viewed 01.05.2022].

Grozījumi Kriminālprocesa likumā [Amendments to the Criminal Procedure Law]. (20.06.2018.) Available: https://likumi.lv/ta/id/300107-grozijumi-kriminalprocesa-likuma [last viewed 01.05.2022].

Grozījumi Kriminālprocesa likumā [Amendments to the Criminal Procedure Law]. (11.06.2020.) Available: https://likumi.lv/ta/id/315655-grozijumi-kriminalprocesa-likuma [last viewed 01.05.2022].

Grozījumi Kriminālprocesa likumā [Amendments to the Criminal Procedure Law]. (19.11.2020.) Available: https://likumi.lv/ta/id/319095-grozijumi-kriminalprocesa-likuma [last viewed 01.05.2022].

Draft law No.1323/Lp13 Grozījumi Kriminālprocesa likumā [Amendments to the Criminal Procedure Law]. Available: https://titania.saeima.lv/LIVS13/SaeimaLIVS13.nsf/webAll?SearchView&Query=([Title]=*kriminālprocesa*)&SearchMax=0&SearchOrder=4 [last viewed 01.05.2022].

Latvijas Republikas ģenerālprokurora ziņojums par 2021. gadā paveikto un 2022. gada darbības prioritātēm [Report by the Prosecutor General of the Republic of Latvia on the Performance in 2021 and Priority Actions in 2022]. Available: http://www.prokuratura.gov.lv/media/Normativie_akti/Zinojums.pdf [last viewed 01.05.2022].

Likumprojekta (1323/Lp13) “Grozījumi Kriminālprocesa likumā” sākotnējās ietekmes novērtējuma ziņojums (anotācija) [Initial Impact Assessment (Annotation) of the Draft Law (1323/Lp13) “Amendments to the Criminal Procedure Law]. Available: https://titania.saeima.lv/LIVS13/saeimalivs13.nsf/0/1493B4CCDCBD851EC22587DB0029DF4D?OpenDocument#B [last viewed 01.05.2022].

The course of reviewing draft law No. 699 of the 8th Saeima. Available: https://www.saeima.lv/L_Saeima8/index.htm [last viewed 01.05.2022].

Downloads

Published

2022-11-16

How to Cite

Strada-Rozenberga, K., & Meikališa, Ārija. (2022). Corporate Prosecutions – on Some Relevant Issues Related to the Criminal Procedural Status of Legal Entities. Journal of the University of Latvia. Law, 15, 18–33. https://doi.org/10.22364/jull.15.02