Examining Ukraine’s EU Candidate Status: (When) Does the Accession Process Turn from Political to Legal?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22364/jull.17.06Keywords:
EU candidate country, European Council, accession to the EU, enlargement of the EU, Ukraine, Court of Justice of the European UnionAbstract
This article explores the nature of the notion “candidate country status” in the context of EU accession. In particular it enquires whether the candidate status, which was granted to Ukraine by the European Council on 23 June 2022, has any actual legal implications or is the whole accession process up to the point where accession agreement is signed entirely devoid of legal consequences. Legal doctrine seems to generally answer this question in the affirmative, explaining that the candidate status was a rather political concept bearing primarily symbolic relevance. However, the example of Ukraine, which was granted candidate status much more rapidly than a number of other countries before it, challenges to explore the topic in more depth, in particular by delving into the CJEU’s existing case law on candidate status and the possibility of challenging the granting of candidate status through litigation in the CJEU.
References
Baczynska, G., Bartunek, R. J. EU agrees Dutch demands on Ukraine deal to avoid present for Russia. Available: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-ukraine-crisis-eu-rutte-idUSKBN14416I/ [last viewed 12.01.2024].
Beutel, J., Broks, E., Buka, A., Schewe, C. Setting Aside National Rules that Conflict EU law: How Simmenthal works in Germany and in Latvia. In: New Legal Reality: Challenges and Perspectives. University of Latvia Press, 2022, pp. 123–142. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22364/iscflul.8.2.10
Dörr, O. Art. 50 EUV, para. 1–7. In: Das Recht der Europäischen Union: EUV/AEUV [The Law of the EU: TEU/TFEU], Grabitz, E., Hilf, M., Nettesheim, M. (eds). Beck, 2021.
Eastern Partnership on the website of the Council of the EU. Available: https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/policies/eastern-partnership/#candidate [last viewed 12.01.2024].
Enzyklopädie Europarecht [Encyclopedia of EU Law]. Vol. 1, § 21, Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2022.
Estonia’s way into the EU. Available: https://eu.mfa.ee/wp-content/uploads/sites/19/2018/09/Estonias_way_into_the_EU.pdf [last viewed 12.01.2024].
Europäischer Rat Kopenhagen, 21./22.6.1993, Schlussfolgerungen des Vorsitzes, [European Council Copenhagen 21/22.6.1993, conclusions of the presidency]. S. 13 des Umdrucks, SN 180/1/93. Available: http://www.consilium.europa.eu/ueDocs/cms_Data/docs/pressData/de/ec/72924.pdf [last viewed 12.01.2024].
Felz, S. Geplatztes Heiratsversprechen: Das doppelt verfassungswidrige Kranzgeld [Bursted wedding-promise: A wreath money which is doubly unconstitutional]. Available: www.lto.de/recht/feuilleton/f/kranzgeld-verloebnis-heirat-ehe-schadensersatz-frau-unbescholten-verfassungswidrig/ [last viewed 12.01.2024].
Kochenov, D., Janse, R. Admitting Ukraine to the EU: Article 49 TEU is the ‘Special Procedure’. EU Law Live, 30 March 2022. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4083111 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4083111 [last viewed 12.01.2024]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4083111
Korkea-aho, E. National Courts and European Soft Law: Is Grimaldi Still Good Law? Yearbook of European Law, Vol. 37, 2018, pp. 470–495. Available: https://academic.oup.com/yel/article/doi/10.1093/yel/yey008/5259665?searchresult=1 [last viewed 12.01.2024]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/yel/yey008
Lenaerts, K., Gutiérrez-Fons, J. A. The Constitutional Allocation of Powers and General Principles of EU Law. Common Market Law Review, Vol. 47, No. 6, 2010, pp. 1629–1669. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54648/COLA2010069
Lorenzmeier, S. Das Assoziierungsübereinkommen EU – Ukraine und der Krieg. Ukraine-Krieg und Recht (UKuR) [The Association Agreement EU-Ukraine and the War. Ukraine and the War]. München, Beck, 2022.
Lorenzmeier, S. Der Beitritt der Ukraine zur EU: Rechtliche und politische Fragestellungen, Ukraine-Krieg und Recht (UKuR) [The EU-Accession of the Ukraine: Legal and Political Questions, Ukraine and the War]. Beck, 2022.
Majkowska-Szulc, S., Wierczyńska, K. European Neighbourhood Policy and EU Enlargement. In: The Oxford Handbook of International Law in Europe. Oxford University Press, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198865315.013.20
Ohler, C. Art. 49 EUV, para. 3. In: Das Recht der Europäischen Union: EUV [The law of the Europena Union], Grabitz, E., Hilf, M., Nettesheim, M. (eds). Beck, 2021.
Pechstein, M. Enzyklopädie Europarecht [Encyclopedia European Law], Vol. 1, § 21, Nomos, 2022.
Peters, A. Soft Law as a New Mode of Governance. In: The Dynamics of Change in EU Governance, Diedrichs, U., Reiners, W., Wessels, W. (eds). Edward Elgar Publishing, 2011, pp. 423–424 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9780857930316.00008
Poole, S. Don’t Say Divorce, Say Special Relationship: The Thorny Language of Brexit. Available:
www.theguardian.com/books/2017/apr/07/brexit-language-divorce-special-relationship-negotiation-britain-eu [last viewed 12.01.2024].
Schewe, C., Aliyev, A. The Customs Union and the Common Economic Space of the Eurasian Economic Community: Eurasian Counterpart to the EU or Russian Domination? German Yearbook of International Law, Vol. 54, 2011, p. 565.
Snyder, F. The Effectiveness of European Community Law: Institutions, Processes, Tools and Techniques. The Modern Law Review, 56(1), 1993. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.1993.tb02852.x
Šarčević, E. EU-Erweiterung nach Art. 49 EUV: Ermessensentscheidungen und Beitrittsrecht, Europarecht [EU Enlargement and 49 TEU: Decisions implying Discretion and the Law regarding Accession]. Nomos, 2002.
Tatham, A. F. ‘Don’t Mention Divorce at the Wedding, Darling!’: EU Accession and Withdrawal after Lisbon. In: EU Law After Lisbon, Biondi, A. et al. (eds). Oxford University Press, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199644322.003.0006
Terhechte, J. Art. 49 EUV, Para 21. In: Kommentar zu EUV, GRC und AEUV [Commentary on TEU, CFR and TFEU], Pechstein, M., et al. (eds). Mohr Siebeck: 2017.
Tridimas, T. The General Principles of EU Law. Oxford University Press, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199258062.001.0001
Veebel, V. Relevance of Copenhagen criteria in actual accession: Principles, methods and shortcomings of EU pre-accession evaluation. Studies of Transition States and Societies, 3(3), 2011, pp. 3–23.
Vöneky, S., Beylage-Haarmann, B. Art. 217 AEUV, para. 1–3. In: Das Recht der Europäischen Union: EUV/AEUV [The Law of the EU: TEU/TFEU], Grabitz, E., Hilf, M., Nettesheim, M. (eds). Beck, 2021.
Wessel, R. The EU solution to deal with the Dutch referendum result on the EU-Ukraine Association Agreement. European Papers, Vol. 1, No. 3, 2016, pp. 1305–1309. Available: www.europeanpapers.eu/en/europeanforum/eu-solution-deal-dutch-referendum-result-on-the-eu-ukraine-association-agreement [last viewed 12.01.2024].
Zeh, J. Recht auf Beitritt? Ansprüche von Kandidatenstaaten gegen die Europäische Union [Right to Accession? A Right of Candidate States vs. the EU]. Nomos, 2002.
Treaty on European Union (consolidated version). Originally signed in Maastricht, 7 February 1992.
Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated version). Originally signed in Rome, 25 March 1957.
Association Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community and their Member States, of the one part, and Ukraine, of the other part. Available: https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/documents-publications/treaties-agreements/ratification/?id=2014045&partyid=NL&doclanguage=en [last viewed 12.01.2024].
Regulation (EU) 2018/1971 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2018 establishing the Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications (BEREC) and the Agency for Support for BEREC (BEREC Office), amending Regulation (EU) 2015/2120 and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1211/2009; OJ 2018 L 321, p. 1.
Judgement of 31 March 1971 of the Court of Justice of the European Union in case 22/70 Commission v. Council.
Judgment of 22 November 1978 of the Court of Justice of the European Union in case 93/78 Mattheus/Doego Fruchtimport.
Judgement of 13 February 2014 of the Court of Justice of the European Union in case C 31/13 P Hungary v. Commission.
CJEU judgment of 26 February 2016 in joined cases T 546/13, T 108/14 and T 109/14 Šumelj and others.
Judgment of 17 January 2023 of the Court of Justice of the European Union in case C 632/20 P Spain v. Commission.
CJEU judgment of 22 June 2021 in case C-872/19 P Venezuela v. Council.
CJEU judgment of 21 December 2021 in joined cases C 357/19, C 379/19, C 547/19, C 811/19 and C 840/19 Euro Box Promotion and Others.
Judgment of 22 June 2023 of the Court of Justice of the European Union in case C-823/21 Commission v. Hungary.
Judgment of 30 March 2006 of the General Court in case T-2/04 Korkmaz and others.
Decision of 28 February 2017 of the General Court in case T 193/16 NG v. European Council.
European Commission. Guide to the Main Administrative Structures Required for Implementing the Acquis May 2005. Available: http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/pdf/enlargement_process/accession_process/how_does_a_country_join_the_eu/negotiations_croatia_turkey/adminstructures_version_may05_35_ch_public_en. pdf [last viewed 12.01.2024].
European Commission. Translation: where do we stand after completion of the fifth enlargement? MEMO/07/76. Brussels, 23 February 2007. Available: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/de/MEMO_07_76 [last viewed 12.01.2024].
European Commission, Commission Opinion on Ukraine’s application for membership of the European Union, Brussels, 17.6.2022, COM(2022) 407 final. Available https://neighbourhood-enlargement.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2022-06/Ukraine%20Opinion%20and%20Annex.pdf [last viewed 12.01.2024].
European Council Conclusions, 23 and 24 June 2022. Available: https://www.consilium.europa.eu/media/57442/2022-06-2324-euco-conclusions-en.pdf [last viewed 12.01.2024].
European Parliament resolution of 23 June 2022 on the candidate status of Ukraine, the Republic of Moldova and Georgia (2022/2716(RSP)), (2023/C 32/01). Available: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52022IP0249 [last viewed 12.01.2024].
EU-Ukraine Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Area (DCFTA). Available: https://www.eeas.europa.eu/sites/default/files/tradoc_150981.pdf [last viewed 12.01.2024].
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 University of Latvia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
