Communicative Failures Presented in American Comedy Series Analysed from a Psycholinguistic Perspective
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22364/BJELLC.12.2022.06Keywords:
affect, cinema, cognition, communicative failure, inference, intersubjectivity, volitionAbstract
The paper reveals and describes the causes of communicative failures from a perspective of the intersubjective approach to communication incorporating basic assumptions of psycholinguistics. It introduces a unit of communication analysis called an intersubjective act. It is defined as an inter-action, where verbal/non-verbal communicative actions of addressers are viewed as perceptual stimuli that, coming into the focus of addressees’ attention, trigger parallel conscious/non-conscious inference processes involving cognition, volition, and affect to issue a command of a communicative and/or (immediate or postponed) social action. Inferential analysis applied in the research provides tools for the recreation of communicants’ inferential processes and allows consideration of perceptual, cognitive, affective, and volitional aspects of interaction. Inferential analysis handles American cinema discourse represented by the genre of a situation comedy that models live communication, supplying instances of communicative failures to subject to analysis. А communicative failure is viewed as an inability on the part of an addressee to make an inference or make a faulty inference in an intersubjective act. Communicative failures are identified and classified in accordance with the element of the physical or mental experience of the participants of an intersubjective act, which plays a privileged role in causing them. We distinguish between perceptual, lingua-cognitive, cognitive and affective-volitional communicative failures.
References
Anderson, J. R. (1976) Language, Memory and Thought. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
Austin, J. L. (1986) Slovo kak deystvie [How to do things with words]. In B. Yu. Gorodetskiy (ed.), Novoye v zarubezhnoy lingvistike [New in foreign linguistics], 17: 22–129. Moscow: Progress.
Bara, B. G. (2010) Cognitive Pragmatics: the mental processes of communication. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Cienki, A. (2016) Cognitive Linguistics, gesture studies, and multimodal communication. Cognitive Linguistics, 27 (4): 603–618. doi: 10.1515/cog-2016-0063.
Damasio, A. (1999) The Feeling of What Happens. New York: Harcourt.
Damasio, A. (2003) Looking for Spinoza. New York: Harcourt.
Di Paolo, E. A. and Thompson, E. (2014) The enactive approach. In L. Shapiro (ed.) The Routledge Handbook of Embodied Cognition (pp. 68–78). London: Routledge Press. doi: 10.4324/9781315775845.
Eckert, P. and McConnell-Ginet, S. (1995) Constructing meaning, constructing selves: Snapshots of language, gender and class from Belten High. In K. Hall and M. Bucholtz (eds.) Gender Articulated: arrangements of language and the socially constructed self (pp. 469–507). New York, London: Routledge Press.
Ellis, R. D. and Newton, N. (2012) Could moving others be the link between emotion and consciousness? In A. Foolen, U. Ludtke, T. Racine and J. Zlatev (eds.) Moving Ourselves, Moving Others (pp. 57–80). Amsterdam: Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/ceb.6.03ell.
Enkvist, N. E. (1992) Success concepts. In A. C. Lindeberg, N. E. Enkvist and K. Wikberg (eds.) Nordic Research on Text and Discourse. NORDTEXT Symposium (pp. 17–26). Abo: Abo Academy Press.
Ermakova, O. P. and Zemskaya, E. А. (1993) K postroeniyu tipologii kommunikativnykh neudach (na materiale estestvennogo russkogo dialoga) [Toward the typology of communicative failures (based on the natural Russian dialogue)]. In E. А. Zemskaya (ed.) Russkiy yazyk v ego funktsionirovanii: kommunikativno-pragmaticheskiy aspekt [The Russian language in its functioning: communicative-pragmatic aspect] (pp. 30–64). Moscow: Nauka.
Fauconnier, G. ([1985] 1994) Mental Spaces: aspects of meaning construction in natural languages. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Fauconnier, G. (1997) Mappings in Thought and Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fillmore, C. (1982) Frame semantics. In the Linguistic Society of Korea (eds.), Linguistics in the Morning Calm (pp. 111–137). Seoul: Hanshin.
Gallagher, S. (2012) Neurons, neonates and narrative. In A. Foolen, U. Ludtke, T. Racine and J. Zlatev (eds.) Moving Ourselves, Moving Others (pp. 167–196). Amsterdam: Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/ceb.6.07gal.
Gorodetskiy, B. Y., Kobozeva, I. M. and Saburova, I. G. (1985) K tipologii kommunikativnykh neudach [Toward the typology of communicative failures]. Dialogovoe vzaimodeystvie i predstavlenie znaniy [Dialogical interaction and knowledge presentation] (pp. 64–78). Novosibirsk: SO AN SSSR.
Grice, H. P. (1957) Meaning. The Philosophical Review, 66 (3): 377–388.
Grice, H. P. (1975) Logic and conversation. In P. Cole, P. and J. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and Semantics, 3 (pp. 41–58). New York: Academic Press.
Gudkov, D. B. (2003) Teoriya i praktika mezhkulturnoy kommunikatsii [Theory and practice of intercultural communication]. Moscow: ITDGK ‘Gnosis’.
Hardy, C. (1998) Networks of Meaning: A bridge between mind and matter. Westport, CT, London: Praeger.
Johnson, M. (1987) The Body in the Mind (the bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason). Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
Kukushkina, O. V. (1998) Osnovnye tipy rechevykh neudach v russkikh pismennykh tekstakh [Main types of speech failures in Russian written texts]. Moscow: MGU. Available from: http://www.philol.msu.ru/~lex/pdfs/kukushkina_chapter2.pdf [Accessed on 11 October 2021].
Lakoff, G. (1994) What is a conceptual system? In W. F. Overton and D. S. Palermo (eds.) The Nature and Ontogenesis of Meaning (pp. 41–86). New Jersey Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Langacker, R. W. (2001) Discourse in cognitive grammar. Cognitive Linguistics, 12 (2): 143-188. doi: 10.1515/cogl.12.2.143.
Langacker, R. W. (1987) Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Vol. I: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Lavrinenko, O. L. (2015) Typizatsiya kommunikatyvnykh provaliv kris pryzmu psyholingvistyky [Typology of communicative failures from pycholinguistic perspective]. Psykhologichni perspektyvy [Psychological Prospects], 2: 187–199.
Leontev, A. N. (1983) Deyatelnost. Soznanie. Lichnost [Activity. Consciousness. Personality]. Moscow: Vysshaya Shkola.
Loseva, A. A. (2007) K probleme vozniknoveniya rechevykh konfliktov v bilingvalnykh gruppakh [Toward the problem of verbal conflicts in bilingual groups]. In T. S. Vershina (ed.) Yazyk i konflikt [Language and conflict] (pp. 215–221). Yekaterinburg: UrGU.
Martynyuk, A. (2017) ‘Now that the magic is gone’ or toward cognitive analysis of verbal/co-verbal communication. Cognition, Communication, Discourse, 15: 51–72. doi: 10.26565/2218-2926-2017-15-04.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1945/1962) Phenomenology of Perception; trans. into English by C. Smith. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Noë, A. (2004) Action in Perception. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Panksepp, J. (1998) Affective Neuroscience. New York: Oxford University Press.
Panksepp, J. (2000) The neuro-evolutionary cusp between emotions and cognitions: implications for understanding consciousness and the emergence of unified mind science. Consciousness and Emotion, 1: 17–56. doi: 10.1075/ce.1.1.04pan.
Polyakova, S. E. (2009) Kommunikativnye neudachi v angloyazychnom politicheskom diskurse [Communicative failures in English political discourse]. Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis. Saint Petersburg: Sankt-Peterburgskiy gosudarstvennyiy universitet ekonomiki i finansov.
Potebnya, A. A. (1892) Mysl i yazyk [Thought and language]. Kharkov: Adolf Darres Printing House.
Ringle, M. H. and Bruce, B. C. (1982) Conversation failure. In W. G. Lehnert and M. H. Ringle (eds.) Strategies for Natural Language Processing (pp. 203–221). Hillsdale, London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Schank, R. C. and Abelson, R. P. (1977) Script, Plans, Goals, and Understanding: an inquiry into human knowledge structures. Hillsdale: Laurence Erlbaum Associates.
Sheets-Johnstone, M. (2012) Fundamental and inherently interrelated aspects of animation. In A. Foolen, U. Ludtke, T. Racine and J. Zlatev (eds.) Moving Ourselves, Moving Others: Motion and emotion in intersubjectivity, consciousness and language (pp. 29–55). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/ceb.6.02she.
Sperber, D. and Wilson, D. (1986/1995) Relevance: communication and cognition. Oxford; Cambridge: Blackwell.
Teplyakova, E. K. (1998) Kommunikativnye neudachi pri realizatsii rechevykh aktov pobuzhdeniya v dialogicheskom diskurse (na materiale sovremennogo nemetskogo yazyka) [Communicative failures in performative speech acts in the dialogue discourse (based on the modern German language)]. Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis. Tambov: Tambovskiy gosudarstvennyiy pedagogicheskiy institut.
Thomas, J. (1983) Cross-cultural pragmatic failure. Applied Linguistics, 4 (2): 91–112. doi: 10.1093/applin/4.2.91.
Trevarthen, C. (1998) The Concept and Foundations of Infant Intersubjectivity. In S. Braten (ed.) Intersubjective Communication and Emotion in Early Ontogeny (pp. 15–46). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Trevarthen, C. and Frank, B. (2012) Intuitive meaning: Supporting impulses for interpersonal life in the sociosphere of human knowledge, practice and language. In A. Foolen, U. Ludtke, T. Racine and J. Zlatev (eds.) Moving Ourselves, Moving Others (pp. 261–305). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Turner, M. (1991) Reading Minds: the study of English in the age of cognitive science. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Varela, F., Thompson, E. and Rosch, E. (1991) The Embodied Mind: Cognitive science and human experience. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Vygotskiy, L. S. (1934) Myshlenie i rech. Psikhologicheskie issledovaniya [Thought and speech. Psychological studies]. Moscow, Leningrad: Gosudarstvennoe socialno-ekonomicheskoe izdatelstvo.
Wilson, D. (2016) Relevance theory. In Y. Huang (ed.) Oxford Handbook of Pragmatics (pp. 1–25). Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199697960.013.25.
Zalevskaya, A. A. (2014) Interfeysnaya teoriya znacheniya slova: psikholingvisticheskiy podkhod [Interfacial theory of word meaning: a psycholinguistic approach]. London: IASHE.
Zasiekina, L. (2007). Movna osobystist u suchasnomu sotsialnomu prostori [Lingual personality in the modern social sphere]. Social Psychology, 5: 82–90.
Zlatev, J. (2008) Intersubjectivity: What makes us human? In J. Zlatev, T. Racine, C. Sinha and E. Itkonen (eds.) The Shared Mind: perspectives on intersubjectivity (pp. 1–17). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/celcr.12.02zla.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 University of Latvia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
