‘Return to the International Family of Democracies’: Keyness Factor in the International Speeches of the Baltic Presidents
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22364/BJELLC.12.2022.08Keywords:
presidential speeches, Baltic States, corpus linguistics, critical discourse analysis, identity, keynessAbstract
Presidential speeches as a type of political discourse are aimed not only at the negotiation and construction of the national identity of a nation-state at a local level but also at the representation and shaping of the national identity internationally. The presidents of the Baltic States have represented their individual, collective and regional identities in the international gatherings of world leaders since the restoration of independence of Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania from the Soviet Union. The current study displays an analysis of how the keyness factor of particular lexical items used in 142 speeches given by the presidents of the Baltic States internationally from 1991 until 2021 helps to identify the tendencies of identity construction and representation, which can then be investigated in detail via a critical analysis of the discursive strategies and linguistic means applied in the speeches. Moreover, the analysis of keyword tendencies across speeches marked by different criteria shows how the process of identity construction as marked by lexical change varies across time and states. The keyness factor points to multiple identities being constructed in the international speeches, where the national identities are constructed most frequently, followed by the common European identity, Baltic regional identity, and global identity. It is also concluded that a common political past is one of the main elements of national and Baltic identities, while shared values such as democracy and cooperation are the main elements of supra-national identities.
References
Baker, P. (2006) Using Corpora in Discourse Analysis. New York and London: Continuum Publishing.
Bartlett, T. (2012). Hybrid voices and collaborative change: Contextualising positive discourse analysis. New York: Routledge.
Billig, M. (2002) Critical discourse analysis and the rhetoric of critique. In G. Weiss and R. Wodak (eds.) Critical Discourse Analysis: Theory and Interdisciplinarity (pp. 35–46). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Bondi, M. and Scott, M. (2010) Keyness in Texts. Amsterdam: John Benjamins B.V.
Breeze, R. (2011) Critical discourse analysis and its critics. Pragmatics, 21 (4): 493–525.
Duvold, K., Berglund, S. and Ekman, J. (2020) Political Culture in the Baltic States: Between National and European Integration. Johannesburg: Palgrave Macmillan.
Flowerdew, J. and Richardson, J. E. (2017) The Routledge Handbook of Critical Discourse Studies. New York: Routledge.
Hackman, J. (1996) The Baltic world and the power of history. Anthropological Journal on European Cultures, 5 (2): 9–33.
Haider, A. S. (2017) Using Corpus Linguistic Techniques in Critical Discourse Studies: Some Comments on the Combination. Christchurch: The University of Canterbury. Available from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/317045137_Using_Corpus_Linguistic_Techniques_in_Critical_Discourse_Studies_Some_Comments_on_the_Combination [Accessed on 15 October 2019].
Haider, A. S. (2016) A Corpus-assisted Critical Discourse Analysis of the Arab Uprisings. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis. Christchurch: University of Canterbury. Available from https://ir.canterbury.ac.nz/bitstream/handle/10092/13008/Haider%2c%20Ahmad%20Final_%20PhD%20Thesis%20Linguistics% 2056442034%20%28Final%29.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y Accessed on 7 September 2020].
Hammersley, M. (1997) On the foundations of critical discourse analysis. Language and Communication, 17: 237–248.
Hart, C. and Cap, P. (2014) Contemporary Critical Discourse Studies. New York, New Delhi, Sydney: Bloomsbury.
Kelly, S. (2020) Who Deserves Compassion? A Corpus-Assisted Critical Discourse Analysis of The Discursive Construction of Syrian Refugees, Asylum Seekers, Immigrants and Migrants in UK Newspaper Reports Published Between October 2014 and September 2016. Unpublished PhD thesis. Nottingham: University of Nottingham. Available from http://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/id/eprint/60949 [Accessed on 1 September 2021]
Kitishat, A. R., Al Kayed, M. and Al-Ajalein, M. (2020) A corpus-assisted critical discourse analysis of the Syrian refugee crisis in Jordanian newspapers. International Journal of English Linguistics, 10 (6): 195–201.
Lasas, A. (2008) Restituting victims: EU and NATO enlargements through the lenses of collective guilt. Journal of European Public Policy, 15 (1): 98–114.
Lasas, A. (2008a) Guilt, sympathy, and cooperation: EU—Baltic relations in the early 1990s. East European Politics and Societies and Cultures, 22 (2): 347–372.
Lucas, E. (2009) The fall and rise and fall again of the Baltic States. Foreign Policy, 173: 72–79.
Maglie, R. B. and Centonze, L. (2021) Reframing language, disrupting aging: a corpus-assisted multimodal critical discourse study. Working with Older People, 25 (3): 253–264. Available from https://doi.org/10.1108/WWOP-06-2021-0032 [Accessed on 20 September 2021].
Matthews, A. (2021) Sociotechnical imaginaries in the present and future university: a corpus-assisted discourse analysis of UK higher education texts. Learning, Media and Technology, 46 (2): 204–217.
Miller, A. (2018) Text mining digital humanities projects: assessing content analysis capabilities of Voyant Tools. Journal of Web Librarianship, 12 (3): 169–197.
Mole, R. C. M. (2007) Discursive Constructions of Identity in European Politics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Mole, R. C. M. (2012) The Baltic States from the Soviet Union to the European Union: Identity, Discourse and Power in the Post-communist Transition of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania. London, New York: Routledge.
Mulderrig, J. (2008) Using keywords analysis in CDA: discourses in the knowledge economy in education. In B. Jessop, N. Fairclough and R. Wodak (eds.) Education and the Knowledge-based Economy in Europe. Educational Futures: Rethinking Theory and Practice, Sense (pp. 149–169). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Romāne-Kalniņa, L. (2020) Keyword analysis in presidential rhetoric throughout hundred years of independence of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania: corpus linguistic tools in critical discourse analysis. In Karpinska, L., Farneste, M., Placinska, A. and Vladimirska, E. (eds.) Language for International Communication: Linking Interdisciplinary Perspectives (pp. 95–109). Riga: University of Latvia Press.
Shah, N. (2021) Employability of persuasive and rhetorical strategies: a corpus-assisted critical discourse analysis of prime minister Imran Khan’s selected address. University of Chitral Journal of Linguistics & Literature, 4 (2): 56–78.
Slembrouck, S. (2001) Explanation, interpretation and critique in the analysis of discourse. Critique of Anthropology, 21: 33–57.
Stubbs, M. (1997) Whorf’s children: Critical comments on critical discourse analysis. In Ryan, A. and Wray, A. (eds.) Evolving models of language (pp. 100–116). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Subrenat, J. J. (2004) Estonia: Identity and Independence. Amsterdam, New York: Rodopi B. V.
Tabuns, A. (1999) Changing National, States and Regime Identities in Latvia. Prague: Research Support Scheme.
Widdowson, H. (1998) The theory and practice of Critical Discourse Analysis. Applied Linguistics, 19 (1): 136–151.
Wodak, R. and Koller, V. (2008) Handbook of Communication in the Public Sphere. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Wodak, R. and Meyer, M. (2016) Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Sage Publications Ltd.
Wodak, R., de Cillia, R., Reisigl, M. and Liebhart, K. (2009) Discursive Construction of National Identity. London, New York: Routledge.
Žagar, I. Ž. (2010) Topoi in critical discourse analysis. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics, 6 (1): 3–27.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 University of Latvia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
