Time Deixis in Engineering Discourse
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22364/BJELLC.11.2021.02Keywords:
time deixis, deictic expressions, pragmatic meaning, reference, engineering discourseAbstract
Nowadays, it has become commonly accepted that the meaning of linguistic elements is interconnected with the context of their use. Deixis is one of the classical pragmatic phenomena that illustrates that context-dependence is inherent in language as meaning of deictic expressions cannot be constructed without the identification of the speech event where these expressions occurred. The present article discusses cases of time deixis in the context of engineering discourse. The goal of the research is to demonstrate how the deictic expression use in different genres of professional discourse impacts meaning construction. The study deals with the data obtained from scientific articles, encyclopaedia chapters and coursebooks. The findings indicate that temporal deictic expressions can be utilized both deictically and non-deictically and their frequency may depend on the genre within each professional discourse. Further research can be conducted to investigate the use of other categories of deictic expressions in engineering discourse.
References
Archer, D., Aijmer, K. and Wichmann, A. (2012) Pragmatics. An Advanced Resource Book for Students. London: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203718124
Ariel, M. (2010) Defining Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511777912
Borg, E. (2012) Semantics without pragmatics? In K. Allan and K. M. Jaszczolt (eds.) the Cambridge Handbook of Pragmatics (pp. 513-528). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139022453.028
Čerņevska, J. (2016) Scalarity in mechanical engineering discourse. In A. Veisbergs and M. Farneste (eds.) Language for International Communication: Linking Interdisciplinary Perspectives (pp. 31-40). Riga: University of Latvia Press.
Čerņevska, J. (2019) Lexical concept adjustment in mechanical engineering discourse. Baltic Journal of English Language, Literature and Culture, 9: 4-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22364/BJELLC.09.2019.01
Chafe, W. L. (1982) Integration and Involvement in Speaking, Writing, and Oral Literature. In D. Tannen (ed.) Spoken and Written Language: Exploring Orality and Literacy (pp. 35-53). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
De Saussure, L. (2012) Temporal reference in discourse. In K. Allan and K. M. Jaszczolt (eds.) the Cambridge Handbook of Pragmatics (pp. 423-446). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139022453.023
Evans, V. (2009) How Words Mean. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199234660.001.0001
Hardy, C., Harley, B. and Phillips, N. (2004) Discourse analysis and content analysis: two solitudes? In Qualitative Methods (pp. 15-19). Available from https://wcfia.harvard.edu/files/wcfia/files/870_symposium.pdf [Accessed on 5 January 2021].
Huang, Y. (2007) Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hyland, K. (2013) Teaching and Researching Writing. Second Edition. Routledge: London and New York. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315833729
Huang, Y. (2012) the Oxford Dictionary of Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199697960.001.0001
Hyon, S. (2018) Introducing Genre and English for Specific Purposes. Routledge: London and New York. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315761152
Levinson, S. C. (1983) Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Levinson, S. C. (2000) Presumptive Meanings: the Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature. Massachusetts: the MIT Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/5526.001.0001
Levinson, S. C. (2004) Deixis. In L. R. Horn and G. Ward (eds.) the Handbook of Pragmatics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Lyons, J. (1981) Language and Linguistics. An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mey, J. L. (2001) Pragmatics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
Perry, F. L. Jr. (2011) Research in Applied Linguistics. Becoming a Discerning Consumer. Routledge: London and New York.
Recanati, F. (2004) Literal Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615382
Roziņa, G. (2013) Banking and Finance Discourse: Towards Metaphor in Use. Latvia: University of Latvia.
Sidnell, J. (2009) Deixis. In J. Verschueren and J. Ostman (eds.) Key Notions for Pragmatics (pp. 114-138). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/hoph.1.07sid
Sperber, D. and Wilson, D. (1986) Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell (Second edition 1995).
Van Dijk, T. A. (2011) Introduction: the study of discourse. In T. Van Dijk (ed.) Discourse Studies: a Multidisciplinary Perspective (pp. 1-7). London, Los Angeles, New Delhi, Singapore, Washington DC: SAGE. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446289068.n1
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 University of Latvia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
