From Defoe to Coetzee’s Foe/Foe through Authorship
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22364/BJELLC.11.2021.08Keywords:
Defoe, J. M. Coetzee, authorship, canonical/canonicity, self-reflexivity, self-consciousness, authenticity, representationAbstract
The article investigates the concept of authorship in the works of two authors separated by three centuries, namely, Daniel Defoe and J. M. Coetzee, both concerned, in different ways, with aspects regarding the origin and originators of literary works or with the act of artistic creation in general. After a brief literature review, the article focuses on Coetzee’s contemporary revisitation of the question of authorship and leaps back and forth in time from Defoe’s Robinson Crusoe (1719) to Coetzee’s Foe (1986). The purpose is that of highlighting the multiple perspectives (and differences) regarding the subject of authorship, including such notions and aspects as: canonicity related to the act of writing and narrating, metafiction, self-reflexivity and intertextuality, silencing and voicing, doubling, bodily substance and the substance of a story, authenticity, (literary) representation and the truth, authoring, the author’s powers, the relation between author and character or between narrator and story, authorial self-consciousness, agency, or ambiguity. The findings presented in the article show that both works are seminal in their attempts to define and redefine the notion of authorship, one (Defoe) concerned with the first literary endeavours of establishing the roles of professional authorship in England, while the other (Coetzee), intervenes in existing literary discussions of the late twentieth century concerning the postmodern author and (the questioning of or liberation of the text from) his powers.
References
Allen, G. (2006) Intertextuality. London and New York: Routledge Taylor and Francis Group.
Attridge, D. (2004) J. M. Coetzee and the Ethics of Reading: Literature in the Event. Chicago: University Chicago Press.
Attridge, D. and Jolly, R. (1998) Writing South Africa. Literature, Apartheid and Democracy. 1975–1990. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Attwell, D. (1990) the problem of history in the fiction of J. M. Coetzee. Poetics Today, 3: 579-615.
Attwell, D. (1992) Doubling the Point. Essays and Interviews – J. M. Coetzee. Cambridge, Massachusetts and London: Harvard University Press.
Attwell, D. (1993) J. M. Coetzee: South Africa and the Politics of Writing. Berkley, Cape Town: University of California Press. Available from https://publishing.cdlib.org/ucpressebooks/view?docId=ft5k4006q3;query=;brand=ucpress [Accessed on 3 October 2020].
Attwell, D. (2015) J.M. Coetzee and the Life of Writing. Face-to-Face with Time. New York: Viking.
Backscheider, P. R. (1986) Daniel Defoe: Ambition and Innovation. Kentucky: the University Press of Kentucky.
Bennett, A. (2005) the Author. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
Boehmer, E., Iddiols, K. and Eaglestone, R. (eds.), (2009) J. M. Coetzee in Context and Theory. London: Continuum International Publishing Group.
Canepari-Labib, M. (2005) Old Myths – Modern Empires. Power, Language Identity in J. M. Coetzee’s Work. Bern: Peter Lang.
Chapman, M. (1996) Southern African Literatures. London: Longman.
Clarkson, C. (2009) J.M. Coetzee. Countervoices. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
Collier, G. (1992) Us/Them. Translation, Transcription and Identity in Post-Colonial Literary Cultures. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Cuddon, J. A. (2013) a Dictionary of Literary Terms and Literary Theory, 5th ed. Oxford: Wiley & Blackwell.
Culea, M. and Suciu, A. (2020) From Defoe to Coetzee and back. ‘Foe’ through the (meta)language of fiction. Interstudia, 27: 65-75.
Danta, C., Kossew, S. and Murphet, J. (eds.), (2011) Strong Opinions. J. M. Coetzee and the Authority of Contemporary Fiction. London and New York: Continuum International Publishing Group.
Doody, M. A. (1997) the True Story of the Novel. London: Harper Collins Publishers.
Dovey, T. (1988) Novels of J. M. Coetzee: Lacanian Allegories. Johannesburg: Ad. Donker.
Effe, A. (2017) J. M. Coetzee and the Ethics of Narrative Transgression a Reconsideration of Metalepsis. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hall, A. (2012) Disability and Modern Fiction. Faulkner, Morrison, Coetzee and the Nobel Prize for Literature. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
Harris, A. (2018) ‘The island is not a story in itself’: Apartheid’s world literature. Safundi. The Journal of South African and American Studies, 19 (3): 321-337.
Hayes, P. (2010) J. M. Coetzee and the Novel. Writing and Politics after Beckett. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Head, D. (1997) J. M. Coetzee. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Head, D. (2009) the Cambridge Introduction to J. M. Coetzee. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
Huggan, G. and Watson, S. (eds.), (1996) Critical Perspectives on J. M. Coetzee. London: Macmillan Press Ltd.
Hughes, C. L.M. (2008) the Treatment of the Body in the Fiction of J. M. Coetzee. PhD thesis. Available from http://wiredspace.wits.ac.za/bitstream/handle/10539/5764/The%20Treatment%20of%20the%20Body%20in%20the%20Fiction%20of%20JM%20Coetzee%202008.pdf;jsessionid=BFFB9C5EFA64A4E4CBAC9F2C137C6036?sequence=2 [Accessed on 29 September 2020].
Ingram, P. (2008) the Signifying Body. Toward an Ethics of Sexual and Racial Difference. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Kehinde, A. (2006) Post-colonial African literature as counter-discourse: J. M. Coetzee’s Foe and the reworking of the canon. Ufahamu. A Journal of African Studies, UCLA Institute, UC Open Access Publishing. 32 (3): 92-122. Available from https://escholarship.org/content/qt4ph014jj/qt4ph014jj_noSplash_43134ebb831ddff2eede1faaf8160337.pdf. [Accessed on 8 October 2020].
Kosecki, J. (2013) Metaphors of the Body in the Fiction of J. M. Coetzee. PhD thesis. Available from https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/28903169.pdf [Accessed on 30 September 2020].
Kossew, S. (1996) Pen and Power. A Post-Colonial Reading of J. M. Coetzee and André Brink. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Kossew, S. and Harvey, M. (eds.) (2019) Reading Coetzee’s Women. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
Maher, S. N. (1991) Confronting authority: J. M. Coetzee’s Foe and the remaking of Robinson Crusoe. The International Fiction Review, 18 (1): 34-40.
Marais, M. (1989) Interpretative authoritarianism: reading/colonizing Coetzee’s Foe. English in Africa, 16 (1): 9-16.
Martin Salván, P. (2008) Topographies of blankness in J. M. Coetzee’s fiction. Odisea, 9: 145-153. Available from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.861.5033&rep=rep1&type=pdf. [Accessed on 19 September 2020].
Mehigan, T. (ed.) (2013) a Companion to J. M. Coetzee. Rochester, New York: Camden House.
Poyner, J. (2009) J. M. Coetzee and the Paradox of Postcolonial Authorship. Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate Publishing Limited.
Richetti, J. (ed.) (1998/2003) the Cambridge Companion to the Eighteenth-Century Novel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Richetti, J. (ed.) (2008) the Cambridge Companion to Daniel Defoe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sanders, A. (1994) the Short Oxford History of English Literature. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Spacks, P. A. (2006) Novel Beginnings: Experiments in Eighteenth-Century English Fiction. New Haven & London: Yale University Press.
Spivak, G. C. (1990) Theory in the margin: Coetzee’s Foe reading Defoe’s Crusoe/Roxanna. English in Africa, 17 (2): 1-23. Available from https://www.jstor.org/stable/40238659 [Accessed on 25 September 2020].
Splendore, P. (1998) J. M. Coetzee’s Foe: Intertextual and metafictional resonances. Commonwealth, 11(1): 55-60.
Tiffin, H. (1987) Post-Colonial Literatures and Counter-Discourse. Kunapipi, 9 (3): 17-33. Available from http://ro.uow.edu.au/kunapipi/vol9/iss3/4. [Accessed on 29 September 2020].
Volkmann, L., Grimm, N., Detmers, I. and Thomson, K. (eds.), (2010) Local Nature, Global Responsibilities. Ecocritical Perspectives on New English Literatures. Amsterdam/New York: Rodopi.
Watt, I. P. (1957) the Rise of the Novel. London: Chatto & Windus.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 University of Latvia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
