Internationalizing Secondary Education in Poland Through English as a Medium of Instruction
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22364/BJELLC.10.2020.07Keywords:
EMI, CLIL, English, internationalization, bilingual education, bilingual programmesAbstract
Since English as a lingua franca is extending into virtually all domains of public life, non-Anglophone countries move away from the approach of English being taught as a foreign language (EFL) to the practice of English being a medium of instruction for content subjects. The methodology is increasingly implemented at all educational levels from primary to tertiary education. Yet few empirical studies have been undertaken into how the programmes are run. Thus, the article presents the findings of a research project, which attempted to provide a broad picture of this phenomenon in the Polish context. The article explores the two most recognized bilingual programmes in the European Union, Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) and English Medium Instruction (EMI), both being thoroughly investigated in the paper. The article attempts to shed light on the teaching approaches applied in EMI classes. In addition, it discusses the extent to which the English language is used in such classes (partial or exclusive). Further, it focuses on the implications L1 interference has for the L2 learning process taking place in the classroom. Last but not least, the study gives a brief account of students’ and teachers’ perspectives on and attitudes towards EMI. Regarding the methodology, the triangulation of methods was adopted including questionnaires, interviews and observations.
References
Brophy, J. (1999) Perspectives of classroom management: yesterday, today and tomorrow. In H. J. Freiberg (ed.) Beyond Behaviorism: Changing the Classroom Management Paradigm (pp. 43–56). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Brophy, J. (2006) History of research on classroom management. In C. M. Evertson and C. Weinstein (eds.) Handbook of Classroom Management: Research, Practice & Contemporary Issues (pp. 17-43). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Publishers.
Brumfit, C. J. (2004) Language and higher education: two current challenges. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 3 (2): 163–173. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1474022204042685
Coyle, D. (2007) Content and language integrated learning: towards a connected research agenda for CLIL pedagogies. The International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 10 (5): 543–562. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2167/beb459.0
Coleman, J. (2006) English-medium teaching in European Higher Education. Language Teaching, 39 (1): 1–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S026144480600320X
Czura, A. (2009) CLIL – the European and the Polish perspective. Anglica Wratislaviensia, 47: 105-122.
Dearden, J. (2015) English as a Medium of Instruction – a Growing Global Phenomenon. Oxford: British Council.
Dearden, J. and Macaro, E. (2016) Higher education teachers’ attitudes towards English medium instruction: a three-country comparison. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 6 (3): 455-486. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14746/sllt.2016.6.3.5
Gallardo del Puerto, F. Gómez Lacabex, E. and García Lecumberri, M. L. (2009) Testing the effectiveness of content and language integrated learning in foreign language contexts: The assessment of English pronunciation. In Y. Ruiz de Zarobe and R. M. Jimenez Catalan (eds.) Content and language integrated learning. Evidence from research in Europe (pp. 63-80). Bristol: Multilingual Matters. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847691675-007
Littlewood, W. and Yu, B. (2011) First language and target language in the foreign language classroom. Language Teacher, 44 (1): 64-77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444809990310
Marsh, D. (2002) CLIL/EMILE Content and Language Integrated Learning: The European Dimension – Actions, Trends and Forensic Potential. Brussels: European Commission.
Marsh, D. and Laitinen J. (2005) Medium of Instruction in European Higher Education: Summary of Research Outcomes of European Network for Language Learning Amongst Undergraduates (ENLU) Task Group 4. Jyväskylä: UniCOM.
Pérez-Cañado, M. L. (2012) CLIL research in Europe: past, present, and future. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 15 (3): 315-341. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2011.630064
Pérez-Vidal, C. (2007) The need for focus on form (FoF) in Content and Language Integrated approaches: an exploratory study. RESLA 1: 39-54.
Romanowski, P. (2018) CLIL models in Polish lower-secondary schools. Kwartalnik Neofilologiczny, 65 (4): 592-605.
Romanowski, P. (2019) Translanguaging in the Polish educational context: Lessons learnt from IB schools. Bellaterra Journal of Teaching & Learning Language & Literature, 12(1), 5-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/jtl3.795
Simpson, J. (2017) English Language and Medium of Instruction in Basic Education in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: a British Council Perspective. London: British Council.
Toth, J. (2018) English-Medium Instruction for Young Learners in Sweden. Stockholm: Stockholm University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17011/apples/urn.201809214208
Tamtam, A., Gallagher, F., Olabi, A. G., and Naher, S. (2012) A comparative study of the implementation of EMI in Europe, Asia and Africa. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 47: 1417 – 1425. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.836
Tsou, W and Kao, S-M. (2017) English as a Medium of Instruction in Higher Education: Implementations and Classroom Practices in Taiwan. Singapore: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4645-2
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 University of Latvia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.