Impoliteness in Twitter Discourse: a Case Study of Replies to Donald Trump and Greta Thunberg

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22364/BJELLC.14.2024.06

Keywords:

moral order, pragmatic function, strategies, impoliteness, Twitter, offense

Abstract

Twitter (X) is a popular social media platform that allows users to express their opinions and interact on various topics, including politics. However, Twitter can provide a space for impolite and aggressive language use, especially when the issues are controversial or polarizing. This study analyzes the replies to two controversial and similar tweets, namely Donald Trump’s tweet to Greta Thunberg and Greta Thunberg’s tweet to Donald Trump. Ninety-seven tweets that impolitely took issue with the original tweets were collected and coded for their moral order themes and pragmatic functions. Culpeper’s (2011) impoliteness framework was consulted as a threshold to include or exclude reply tweets in the data analysis. The results show that the replies invoked moral order expectations in three overarching categories in the responses to both parties: age-appropriate behavior, respect and manners, and concern for the common good. As far as the pragmatic functions were concerned, criticism of personal characteristics, criticism of supporters, criticism of relatives (to Trump only), praise of the opposing party, directing, mockery, and ideology denial (to Thunberg only) were performed. The study discusses how users took offense through language in a highly polarized political context.

Author Biographies

Esmaeel Ali Salimi, Allameh Tabataba’i University

Esmaeel Ali Salimi (Ph.D. in Applied Linguistics, Associate Professor) is a Professor of Applied Linguistics in the Department of English Language and Literature, faculty of Persian Literature and Foreign Languages, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran. His areas of research interests include Pragmatics, Second Language Research, and Second Language Acquisition.

Seyed Mohammadreza Mortazavi, Allameh Tabataba’i University

Seyed Mohammadreza Mortazavi has a Ph.D. in Applied Linguistics from Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran. His areas of interest include Pragmatics of Politeness, Discourse Analysis, and Second Language Teacher Education.

References

Alizadeh Afrouzi, O. (2021) Social media and journalistic discourse analysis: 2019 Venezuelan presidential crisis. Discourse and Communication, 15 (1): 3-24. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481320961660

Bergmann, J. R. (1998) Introduction: morality in discourse. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 31 (3--4): 279-294. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.1998.9683594

Bousfield, D. (2007) Beginnings, middles and ends: a biopsy of the dynamics of impolite exchanges. Journal of Pragmatics, 39 (12): 2185-2216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.11.005

Brown, P. and Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Clarke, I. and Grieve, J. (2019) Stylistic variation on the Donald Trump Twitter account: a linguistic analysis of tweets posted between 2009 and 2018. PLoS ONE, 14(9): 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222062

Culpeper, J. (2005) Impoliteness and entertainment in the television quiz show: the weakest link. Journal of Politeness Research. Language, Behaviour, Culture, 1 (1): 35-72. https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.35

Culpeper, J. (2011) Impoliteness: using language to cause offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Culpeper, J. and Hardaker, C. (2017) Impoliteness. In J. Culpeper, M. Haugh, and D. Z. Kadar (eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)politeness (pp. 199-225). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Dant, T. (2012) Television and the Moral Imaginary: society through the small screen. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Dobs, A. M. and Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, P. (2013) Impoliteness in polylogal interaction: accounting for face-threat witnesses’ responses. Journal of Pragmatics, 53 (1): 112-130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.05.002

Domenici, K. and Littlejohn, S. (2006) Facework: bridging theory and practice. London: Sage.

Guest, G., Bunce, A. and Johnson, L. (2006) How many interviews are enough?: an experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18 (1): 59-82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903

Haugh, M. (2007) The discursive challenge to politeness research: an interactional alternative. Journal of Politeness Research, 3 (2): 295-317. https://doi.org/10.1515/PR.2007.013

Haugh, M., Kádár, D. Z. and Márquez Reiter, R. (2022) Offence and morality: pragmatic perspectives. Language and Communication, 87 (A): 117-122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2022.07.005

Hemphill, L., Otterbacher, J. and Shapiro, M. A. (2013) What’s congress doing on twitter? Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, CSCW (pp. 877-886). New York: Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/2441776.2441876

Jaidka, K., Zhou, A. and Lelkes, Y. (2019) Brevity is the soul of Twitter: the constraint affordance and political discussion. Journal of Communication, 69 (4): 345-372. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqz023

Matley, D. (2018) ‘Let’s see how many of you mother fuckers unfollow me for this’: the pragmatic function of the hashtag #sorrynotsorry in non-apologetic Instagram posts. Journal of Pragmatics, 133 (1): 66-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.06.003

Nordensvard, J. and Ketola, M. (2021) Populism as an act of storytelling: analyzing the climate change narratives of Donald Trump and Greta Thunberg as populist truth-tellers. Environmental Politics, 31 (5): 861-882. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2021.1996818

Nuessel, F. (2022) Language, pragmatics, and emotions: the case of impoliteness. In S. Petrilli and M. Ji (eds.) Exploring the Translatability of Emotions (pp. 255-277). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91748-7_10

Ott, B. L. (2017) The age of Twitter: Donald J. Trump and the politics of debasement. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 34 (1): 59-68. https://doi.org/10.1080/15295036.2016.1266686

Oz, M., Zheng, P. and Chen, G. M. (2018) Twitter versus Facebook: comparing incivility, impoliteness, and deliberative attributes. New Media & Society, 20 (9): 3400-3419. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817749516

Parvaresh, V. and Tayebi, T. (2018) Impoliteness, aggression and the moral order. Journal of Pragmatics, 132 (1): 91-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.05.010

Ross, A. S. and Caldwell, D. (2020) ‘Going negative’: an appraisal analysis of the rhetoric of Donald Trump on Twitter. Language and Communication, 70 (1): 13-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2019.09.003

Ross, M. (2019) Melania Trump, justifying husband’s attack on Greta Thunberg, never cared Be Best was ‘hypocritical,’ new book says. The Mercury News. December 13. Available from https://tinyurl.com/bd32u5ya [Accessed on 13 September 2023].

Salimi, E.A. and Mortazavi, S.M. (2023) ‘I keep forgetting you’re still alive’: unmasking impoliteness in the Xsphere. Language Teaching Research Quarterly, 37 (1): 18-33. https://doi.org/10.32038/ltrq.2023.38.02

Saz-Rubio, M. M. del. (2023) Assessing impoliteness-related language in response to a season’s greeting posted by the Spanish and English Prime Ministers on Twitter. Journal of Pragmatics, 206 (1): 31-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2023.01.010

Şekerci, Ö. (2023) Culpeper’s impoliteness strategies in Neil Simon’s Biloxi Blues. Baltic Journal of English Language, Literature and Culture, 13 (1): 125-141. https://doi.org/10.22364/BJELLC.13.2023.09

Tayebi, T. (2016) Why do people take offence?: exploring the underlying expectations. Journal of Pragmatics, 101 (1): 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2016.05.006

Tayebi, T. and Parvaresh, V. (2014) Conversational disclaimers in Persian. Journal of Pragmatics, 62 (1): 77-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.09.011

Terkourafi, M. (2019) Im/politeness: a 21st century appraisal. Foreign Languages and Their Teaching, 1 (6): 1-17. https://doi.org/10.13458/j.cnki.flatt.004629

Terkourafi, M., Catedral, L., Haider, I., Karimzad, F., Melgares, J., Mostacero-Pinilla, C., Nelson, J. and Weissman, B. (2018) Uncivil Twitter. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict, 6 (1): 26-57. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.00002.ter

Theocharis, Y., Barberá, P., Fazekas, Z. and Popa, S. A. (2020) The Dynamics of political incivility on Twitter. SAGE Open, 10 (2): 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020919447

Wells, C., Shah, D., Lukito, J., Pelled, A., Pevehouse, J. C. W. and Yang, J. H. (2020) Trump, Twitter, and news media responsiveness: a media systems approach. New Media and Society, 22 (4): 659-682. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819893987

INTERNET SOURCES

[Online 1] Donald Trump, the emperor of social media (2016) Billmoyers, April 29. Available from http://tinyurl.com/4y8633mk [Accessed on 13 September 2023].

[Online 2] Trump mocks teen climate activist Greta Thunberg after TIME honor (2019) Politico, December 12. Available from http://tinyurl.com/bdedpmw7 [Accessed on 13 September 2023].

[Online 3] Greta Thunberg pokes fun at Donald Trump’s election reaction with ‘chill’ tweet (2020) Independent, November 6. Available from http://tinyurl.com/msx293yh [Accessed on 5 November 2023].

TEXTS ANALYSED

Alana (2020) 6 November. Available from https://twitter.com/yinotrjera/status/1324538880796827648 [Accessed on 16 March 16 2024]

Belcamino, A. (2019) 12 December. Available from https://twitter.com/AngelaBelcamino/status/1205119939763429376 [Accessed on 7 March 2024].

Biswas, P. (2020) 7 November. Available from https://twitter.com/ParanoidPrasoon/status/1324897013478010881 [Accessed on 7 March 2024].

Cox, C. (2020) 12 November. Available from https://twitter.com/CostinCox/status/1326979222460649480 [Accessed on 7 March 2024].

Danann (2020) 6 November. Available from https://twitter.com/DanannOficial/status/1324479784949305344 [Accessed on 16 March 2024].

Deal, S. (2019) 12 December. Available from https://twitter.com/SallyDeal4/status/1205210309855571968 [Accessed on 7 March 2024].

Jili (2019) 13 December. Available from https://twitter.com/mommaJ444/status/1205227814041063424 [Accessed: 7 March 2024].

Mediha (2020) 8 November. Available from https://twitter.com/Mediha04gmxde1/status/1325447200516829185 [Accessed on 7 March 2024].

O’Reilly, H. F. (2019) 12 December. Available from https://twitter.com/AynRandPaulRyan/status/1205113893166600192 [Accessed on 7 March 2024].

Pothecary, A. (2020) 13 November. Available from https://twitter.com/MsAnnaPothecary/status/1327062554183610371 [Accessed on 7 March 2024].

Shoug (2020) 4 January. Available from https://twitter.com/shougarifi/status/1213505239195824130 [Accessed on 16 March 2024].

Thunberg, G. (2020) 5 November. Available from https://twitter.com/GretaThunberg/status/1324439705522524162 [Accessed on 7 March 2024].

Trinity (2019) 13 December. Available from https://twitter.com/TrinityResists/status/1205239935285878790 [Accessed on 7 March 2024].

Trump, D. J. (2012) 10 November. Available from https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/267286471172562944 [Accessed on 7 March 2024].

Trump, D. J. (2019) 12 December. Available from https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1205100602025545730 [Accessed on 7 March 2024].

Trump, M. (2019) 5 December. Available from https://twitter.com/FLOTUS45/status/1202344441924571136 [Accessed on 7 March 2024].

Downloads

Published

2024-05-28

How to Cite

Salimi, E. A., & Mortazavi, S. M. (2024). Impoliteness in Twitter Discourse: a Case Study of Replies to Donald Trump and Greta Thunberg. Baltic Journal of English Language, Literature and Culture, 14, 86–107. https://doi.org/10.22364/BJELLC.14.2024.06