The Benefits and Limitations of Teaching English for Specific Purposes Online and Face-To-Face: Sport and Health Sciences Students’ Perspectives

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22364/BJELLC.13.2023.08

Keywords:

sport and health sciences, online learning, face-to-face learning, language acquisition, tertiary education, ESP

Abstract

The restrictions imposed to limit the spread of COVID-19 resulted in the switch from in-person to online teaching, including the teaching of foreign languages in 2020-2022. This study uses the feedback of students who have studied English for Specific Purposes (ESP) in virtual and classroom settings. The aim is to investigate the benefits and limitations of each approach for language acquisition in ESP for sport and health sciences. A questionnaire to ascertain students’ experiences was distributed to 60 students in sport and health sciences who studied ESP at the Latvian Academy of Sport Education. It was found that online and face-to-face studies of ESP in sport and health sciences tended to facilitate the acquisition of different language skills. In the questionnaire, students reported consistent progress in the study of vocabulary and reading the texts related to their area of study during both online and face-to-face studies, but less improvement was reported in the areas of grammar and speaking skills. Overall, synchronous online live classes would facilitate the steady and continuous development of all language skills if supplemented by continuous support from the teaching personnel, regular offline meetings or classes, and access to specially designed online resources.

Author Biographies

  • Anastasija Ropa, Latvian Academy of Sport Education

    Anastasija Ropa (Ph.D.) is a senior researcher at the Latvian Academy of Sport Education. Her research interests include English language and literature, written communication and language acquisition.

  • Ludmila Malahova, Latvian Academy of Sport Education

    Ludmila Malahova (Mg. Paed., Mg. Phil.) is an assistant professor at the Latvian Academy of Sport Education. Her research interests include sport terminology in German, English, and Latvian languages, foreign languages learning methods and language acquisition.

References

Al Lily, E. A., Ismail, A. F., Abunasser, F. M. and Alqahtani, R. H. A. (2020) Distance education as a response to pandemics: Coronavirus and Arab culture. Technology in Society, 63: 1-11. Available from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101317 [Accessed on 6 January 2023]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101317

Apse, V. and Farneste M. (2021) Challenges and opportunities of English grammar acquisition by distance at the tertiary level. Baltic Journal of English Language, Literature and Culture, 11: 4-20. Available from https://doi.org/10.22364/BJELLC.11.2021.01 [Accessed on 6 January 2023]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22364/BJELLC.11.2021.01

Arrosagaray, M., González-Peiteado, M., Pino-Juste, M. and Rodríguez López, B. (2019) A comparative study of Spanish adult students’ attitudes to ICT in classroom, blended and distance language learning modes. Computers & Education, 134: 31-40. Available from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.01.016 [Accessed on 5 January 2023]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.01.016

Demir, B. and Sönmez, G. (2021) Generation Z students’ expectations from English language instruction. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 17 (1): 683-701. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17263/jlls.903536

Djumabaeva, J. and Avazmatova, M. (2022) Teaching English as a foreign language effectively in face-to-face class. Journal of Pedagogical Inventions and Practices, 6: 141-145.

Ekmekçi, E. (2015) Distance-education in foreign language teaching: evaluations from the perspectives of freshman students. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 176: 390-397. Available from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.487 [Accessed on 5 January 2023]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.487

Gacs, A., Goertler, S. and Spasova, S. (2020) Planned online language education versus crisis‐prompted online language teaching: Lessons for the future. Foreign Language Annals, 53 (2): 380-392. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12460

Harsch, C., Müller-Karabil, A. and Buchminskaia, E. (2021) Addressing the challenges of interaction in online language courses. System, 103: 102673. Available from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102673 [Accessed on 6 January 2023]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102673

Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T. and Bond, A. (2020) The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. Educause Review. Available from https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-difference-between-emergency-remote-teaching-and-online-learning [Accessed on 5 January 2023].

Kenny, N. (2016) Is there a specific method for teaching ESP? The Journal of Teaching English for Specific and Academic Purposes, 4 (2): 253-260.

Klimova, B. (2021) An insight into online foreign language learning and teaching in the era of COVID-19 pandemic. Procedia Computer Science, 192: 1787-1794. Available from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.08.183 [Accessed on 7 January 2023]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.08.183

Kohnke, L. and Moorhouse, B. L. (2022) Facilitating synchronous online language learning through Zoom. RELC Journal, 53 (1): 296-301. Available from https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688220937235 [Accessed on 5 January 2023]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688220937235

Kravalis, I., Ciekurs, K., Ropa, A., Mavlutova, I. and Hermanis, J. (2022) Changing teaching methods under the COVID-19 pandemic for Generation Z physical activities: Gender Differences. WSEAS Transactions on Environment and Development, 18: 980-991. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37394/232015.2022.18.94

Kravalis, I., Ciekurs, K., Ropa, A., Mavlutova, I. and Hermanis, J. (2021) Teaching methods for Generation Z for physical activities: A stable labor market provision under the COVID-19 Pandemic. WSEAS Transactions on Business and Economics, 18: 1432-1451. Available from https://doi.org/10.37394/23207.2021.18.132 [Accessed on 7 January 2023]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37394/23207.2021.18.132

Lin, C.-H. and Warschauer, M. (2015) Online foreign language education: what are the proficiency outcomes? The Modern Language Journal, 99 (2): 394-397. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12234_1

Malahova, L. and Ropa, A. (2020) Students’ writing mistakes in learning sports terminology in English, German and Russian languages at the Latvian Academy of Sport Education. LASE Journal of Sport Science, 11 (2): 47-58.

McManus, K. and Marsden, E. (2017) L1 Explicit instruction can improve L2 online and offline performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 39 (3): 459-492. Available from https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226311600022X [Accessed on 7 January 2023]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226311600022X

Meskill, C. and Anthony, N. (2015) Teaching Languages Online. Bristol, Buffalo, Toronto: Multilingual Matters. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783093786

Resnik, P. and Dewaele, J.-M. (2021) Learner emotions, autonomy and trait emotional intelligence in ‘in-person’ versus emergency remote English foreign language teaching in Europe. Applied Linguistics Review. Available from https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2020-0096 [Accessed on 7 January 2023]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2020-0096

Saidvalieva, D. (2021) Teaching methods of English for specific purposes. Bulletin of Science and Practice, 7 (6): 481-485. Available from https://doi.org/10.33619/2414-2948/67/62 [Accessed on 5 March 2023]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33619/2414-2948/67/62

Salomonsson, J. (2020) Modified output and learner uptake in casual online learner-learner conversation. System, 93, Article 102306. Available from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102306 [Accessed on 7 January 2023]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102306

Tao, J. and Gao, X. (2022) Teaching and learning languages online: challenges and responses. System, 107, Article 102819. Available from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2022.102819 [Accessed on 7 January 2023]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2022.102819

Tarrayo, V. N. and Anudin, A. G. (2022) Materials development in flexible learning amid the pandemic: Perspectives from English Language teachers in a Philippine state university. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 17 (1): 102-113. Available from https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2021.1939703 [Accessed on 5 January 2023]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2021.1939703

Teng, M. F. (2022) The effectiveness of multimedia input on vocabulary learning and retention. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching: 1-17. Available from https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2022.2131791 [Accessed on 5 January 2023]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2022.2131791

Zhang, Z., Liu, T. and Lee, C. B. (2021) Language learners’ enjoyment and emotion regulation in online collaborative learning. System, 98, Article 102478. Available from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102478 [Accessed on 5 January 2023]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102478

Downloads

Published

2023-05-15

How to Cite

Ropa, A., & Malahova, L. (2023). The Benefits and Limitations of Teaching English for Specific Purposes Online and Face-To-Face: Sport and Health Sciences Students’ Perspectives. Baltic Journal of English Language, Literature and Culture, 13, 108-124. https://doi.org/10.22364/BJELLC.13.2023.08