Teaching Genres to Advanced Learners
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22364/BJELLC.06.2016.07Keywords:
genres, genre teaching, prototypes, perception-based studyAbstract
The paper reflects recent thinking and research on what genre is, what the purposes of teaching genres are, and how genres should be taught. The paper argues a case for the application of prototype theory to teaching genres, especially with a view of teaching genres to advanced learners. To align its method with the objective specified, the paper presents perception-based data from questionnaire responses provided by a study group of 100 University students. Results from a test on both the receptive and productive skills of the respondents in the group are discussed. Final Test results of the experimental group and a control group are contrasted. The general method applied is a quantitative one as it coheres with the basic postulates of Rosch’s experimental prototype theory. The research method applied is experiment. The conclusions drawn from the study’s data corroborate strongly the applicability of the notion of prototypes to genre teaching.
References
Allen, R. (1989) Bursting bubbles: ‘soap opera’ audiences and the limits of genre. In E. Seiter, G. Borchers and E. Warth (eds.). Remote Control: Television, Audiences and Cultural Power (pp. 44–55). London: Routledge.
Bawarshi, A. (2000) The genre function. College English, 62: 335–360.
Bawarshi, A. and Reif, M. J. (2010) Genre: An Introduction to History, Theory, Research, and Pedagogy. Colorado: Parlor Press and WAC Clearinghouse.
Berlin, B., Breedlove, D. and Raven, P. (1973) General principles of classification and nomenclature in folk biology. American Anthropologist, 74: 214–42.
Biber, D. (1989) A typology of English texts. Linguistics, 27: 3–43.
Buckingham, D. (1993) Children Talking Television: The Making of Television Literacy. London: Falmer Press.
Coleman, L. and Kay, P. (1981) Prototype semantics: The English word ‘lie’. Language, 57: 26–44.
De Beaugrande, R. and Dressler, W. (1981) Introduction to Text Linguistics. London: Longman.
Devitt, A. (1991) Intertextuality in tax accounting. In C. Bazerman and J. G. Paradis (eds.) Textual Dynamics of the Professions (pp. 336–357). Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
Devitt, A. J. (2004) Writing Genres. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
Devitt, A. J. (2009) Teaching critical genre awareness. In C. Bazerman, A. Bonini and D. Figueiredo (eds.) Genre in a Changing World. WAC Clearinghouse and Parlor Press.
Dudley-Evans, T. (1998) Introduction. In I. Fortanet, S. J. C. Palmer and J. F. Coll (eds.) Genre Studies in English for Academic Purposes (pp. 1–4). Castello’n, Spain: Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad.
Edwards, M and McKee, H. (2005) The teaching and learning of Web genres in first–year composition. In A. Herington and Ch. Moran. Genre across the Curriculum (pp. 196–219). Logan: Utah State University Press.
Eggins, S. and Martin, J. R. (1997) Genres and registers of discourse. In T. A. van Dijk (ed.) Discourse as Structure and Process (pp. 230–256). London: SAGE.
Fairclough, N. (1995) Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Longman.
Fairclough, N. (2003) Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. London: Routledge.
Fairclough, N. (2006) Language and Globalization. London: Routledge.
Feldman, J. (2006) From Molecule to Metaphor. A Neural Theory of Language. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Freedman, A. (1999) Beyond the text: Towards understanding the teaching and learning of genres. TESOL Quarterly, 33: 764–767.
Freedman, A. and Medway, P. (1994) Genre and the New Rhetoric. London: Taylor & Francis.
Gamson, A. (1992) Talking Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gavins, J. (2007) Text World Theory: An Introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Giovanelli, M. (2013) Text World Theory and Keats’ Poetry: The Cognitive Poetics of Desire, Dreams and Nightmares (Advances in Stylistics). London: Bloomsbury academic.
Hagan, P. (1994) Competency-based curriculum: The NSW AMES experience. Prospect: A Journal of Australian TESOL, 9: 2 –23.
Hatim, B. and Mason, I. (1990) Discourse and the Translator. London: Longman.
Herington, A. and Moran, Ch. (2005) Genre across the Curriculum. Logan: Utah State University Press.
Herman, D. (2009) Basic Elements of Narrative. Oxford: Wiley–Blackwell.
Hogan, P. C. (2003) The Mind and Its Stories: Narrative Universals and Human Emotion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hogan, P. C. (2011) Affective Narratology: The Emotional Structure of Stories. University of Nebraska Press.
Hyland, K. (2003) Genre-based pedagogies: A social response to process. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12 (1): 17–29.
Hyland, K. (2007) Genre pedagogy: Language, literacy and L2 writing instruction. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16: 148–164.
Hyland, K. (2009) Writing in the disciplines: Research evidence for specificity. Taiwan International ESP Journal, 1: 5–22.
Hyon, S. (1996) Genres in three traditions: Implications for ESL. TESOL Quarterly, 30: 693–722.
Hyvärinen, M. (2012) Prototypes, genres, and concepts: Travelling with narratives. Narrative Works: Issues, Investigations & Interventions, 2 (1): 10–32.
Johns, A. M. (ed.) (2002) Genre in the Classroom: Multiple Perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Earlbaum.
Johns, A. M. (2008). Genre awareness for the novice academic student: An on-going quest. Language Teaching, 41 (2): 237–252.
Johns, A. M. (2013) Rhetorical Genre Studies (RGS) and the Teaching of EFL Reading and Writing – or Genre Is Much More Than Text Structure. Available from http://www.nus.edu.sg/celc/research/books/4th%20Symposium%20proceedings/1).%20Ann%20Johns.pdf [Accessed o 22 July 2015].
Kennedy, G. A. (1998) Comparative Rhetoric: An Historical and Cross-cultural Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.
Kettemann, B. and Marko, G. (2002) Teaching and Learning by Doing Corpus Analysis, Vol. 1. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Lakoff, G. (1982) Categories and Cognitive Models. Berkeley Cognitive Science. Report 2. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Martin, J. R. (1984) Language, register and genre. In F. Christie (ed.) Children Writing: Reader (pp. 21–29). Geelong: Deakin University Press.
Martin, J. R. and Rose, D. (2008) Genre Relations: Mapping Culture. London: Equinox.
Medway, P. (2002) Fuzzy genres and community identities: The case of architecture students’ sketchbooks. In R. Coe, L. Lingard and T. Teslenko (eds.) The Rhetoric and Ideology of Genre. Strategies for Stability and Change, (pp. 123–153). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
Millar, D. (2011) Promoting genre awareness in the EFL classroom. English Teaching Forum, 2: 2–15.
Miller, C. (1984/1994) Genre as social action. Quarterly Journal of Speech 70: 151–67; reprinted in A. Freedman and P. Medway (eds.) Genre and the New Rhetoric (pp. 23–42). London: Taylor & Francis.
Montgomery, M., Durant, A, Fabb, N., Furniss, T. and Mills, S. ([1992] 2000) Ways of Reading: Advanced Reading Skills for Students of English Literature. London: Routledge.
Obeng, S. G. (1996) Language and politics: Indirectness in political discourse. Discourse and Society, 6: 23–30.
Ochs, E. (1997) Narrative. In T. A. van Dijk (ed.) Discourse as Structure and Process (pp. 183–208). London: SAGE.
Palmquist, M. (2005) Writing in emerging genres: Student Web sites in writing and writing-intensive classes. In A. Herington (ed.) Genre across the Curriculum (pp. 219–245). Logan: Utah State University Press.
Paltridge, B. (1996) Genre, text type, and the language learning classroom. ELT Journal, 50: 237–243.
Paltridge, B. (2013) Genre and English for specific purposes. In B. Paltridge and S. Starfield (eds.). Handbook of English for Specific Purposes (pp. 347–366). Malden, MA: Wiley–Blackwell.
Rosch, E. (1973) Natural categories. Cognitive Psychology, 4: 328–50.
Rosch, E. (1975) Cognitive reference points. Cognitive Psychology, 7: 532–47.
Rosch, E. and Mervis, C. (1975) Family resemblances: studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology, 7: 573–605.
Semino, E. (2010) Unrealistic scenarios, metaphorical blends and rhetorical strategies across genres. English Text Construction, 3 (2): 250–74.
Swales, J. (1990) Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Swales, J. (2001) Issues of genre: Purposes, parodies and pedagogies. In: A. Moreno and V. Colwell (eds.) Recent Perspectives on Discourse (pp. 11–26). Leo’n, Spain: University of Leo’n Press.
Swales, J. (2012) A text and its commentaries: toward a reception history of ‘Genre in three traditions’ (Hyon, 1996). Ibérica, 24: 103–116
Taylor, J. (1995) Linguistic Categorization: Prototypes in Linguistic Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Taylor, J. (2015) Prototype effects in grammar. In E. Dabrowska and D. Divjak. (eds.) Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Tincheva, N. (2012) Political Speeches. A Cognitive Perspective on Text and Structure. Sofia: ASKONI.
Tincheva, N. (2015) Text Structure: A Window on Discourse, Context and Mind. Sofia: POLIS Publ.
Toledo, P. (2005) Genre analysis and reading of English as a foreign language: Genre schemata beyond text typologies. Journal of Pragmatics, 37: 1059–1079.
Trosborg, A. (1997) Text typology: Register, genre and text type. Text Typology and Translation, 3: 3–23.
Ungerer, T. and Schmid, H. (1996) An Introduction to Cognitive Linguistics. London: Longman
van Dijk, T. A. (ed.) (1997) Discourse as Structure and Process. London: SAGE.
van Dijk, T. (2008) Discourse and Power. Contributions to Critical Discourse Studies. Houndsmills: Palgrave MacMillan.
van Dijk, T. (2009) Society and Discourse. How Social Contexts Control Text and Talk. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
van Dijk, T. (2014) Discourse and Knowledge. A Sociocognitive Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Virtanen, T. (1992) Issues of text typology: Narrative – a ‘basic’ type of text? Text, 12: 293–310.
Werlich, E. (1976) A Text Grammar of English. Heidelberg: Quelle & Meyer.
Wittgenstein, L. (1953) Philosophical Investigations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Пенчева, М. (1998) Човекът в езика, езикът в човека [Man in Language, Language in Man]. София: Университетско издателство ‘Св. Климент Охридски’.
Пенчева, М. (1996) ‘Семантични опозиции – начин на мислене’ [Semantic Oppositions – A Way of Thinking]. Съпоставително езикознание, XXI, 3.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
