English Language Testing in Moodle: Step Towards University of Latvia Language Policy Implementation

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22364/BJELLC.06.2016.04

Keywords:

English language testing, Moodle, University of Latvia, language policy, focused descriptive study

Abstract

Along with globalisation, university internalisation has taken place, leading to the support for the national and foreign language policies in universities. This has resulted in the expansion of English as a lingua franca of academia. The aims of this study were to discuss the results of the focused descriptive study aimed at obtaining information on the status quo of the students’ English language proficiency level at the University of Latvia (UL) and the feasibility of the introduction of an in-house Moodle-based testing introduction into the learning process at the UL. The piloted test results demonstrate that generally the students have an appropriate English language proficiency level for academic studies at the UL at all degree levels, although exhibiting limitations in writing and some limitations in listening skills. It has also been concluded that Moodle-based online language testing is helpful to meet the language policy goals set out at the University of Latvia.

References

Alimin, I. S. (2014) Assessing Moodle as learning management system platform for English course based TOEFL. International Journal of Computer Trends and Technology, 18(4): 276–279.

Brumfit, C. (2004) Language and higher education: two current challenges. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 3(2): 163–73.

Brown, J. D. (1997) Computers in language testing: Present research and some future directions. Language Learning & Technology, (1): 44–59.

Cole, J. and Foster, H. (2007) Using Moodle: Teaching with the Popular Open Source Course Management System. O’Reilly Media, Inc.

Dörnyei, Z. (2007) Research Methods in Applied Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Dunkel, P. A. (1999) Considerations in developing and using computer-adaptive tests to assess second language proficiency. Language Learning & Technology, 2(2): 77–93.

Edele, A., Seuring, J., Kristen, C. and Stanat, P. (2015) Why bother with testing? The validity of immigrants’ self-assessed language proficiency. Social Science Research, 52: 99–123.

Godwin-Jones, R. (2012) Emerging technologies challenging hegemonies in online learning. Language Learning and Technology, 16 (2): 4–13.

Koyama, Y. and Akiyama, M. (2009) Developing a computer adaptive ESP placement test using Moodle. In T. Bastiaens, J. Dron and C. Xin (eds.) Proceedings of E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2009 (pp. 940–945). Chesapeake, VA: Association for the Advance­ment of Computing in Education (AACE).

Larsen-Freeman, D. and Long, M. (1991) An Introduction to Second Language Acquisition Research. London and New York: Routledge.

Litosseliti, L. (ed.) (2010) Research Methods in Linguistics. New York: Continuum.

Oppenheim, A. N. (2001) Questionnaire Design, Interviewing and Attitude Measurement. London, New York: Continuum.

Shenton, A. K. (2004) Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Education for Information, 22: 63–75.

Voitkāns, A. (2008) Moodle ieviešanas un izmantošanas pieredze Latvijas Universitātē. Prezentācija. [Moodle Introduction and Application Experience at the University of Latvia. Presentation] Available from: http://lata.org.lv/wp-content/conf/LATA_konference_Arnis_Voitkans.pdf

Zheng, Y. (2011) Research Note: Establishing Construct and Concurrent Validity of Pearson Test of English Academic. Construct and Concurrent Validity of PTE Academic_2011.pdf. Available from http://pearsonpte.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/RN_Establishing [Accessed on 10 November 2015].

NORMATIVE DOCUMENTS

The Bologna Declaration, 19 June 1999.

[CEFR] Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment (2001) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

E-Universitātes Projekts [E-University Project]. (2002) Rīga: Latvijas Universitāte.

European Commission. Directorate-General for education, training and youth, European Commission. (1996) Teaching and Learning: Towards the Learning Society: White Paper on Education and Training OOPEC.

Latvijas Universitātes rīkojums 29.06.2015 Nr. 1/184 par svešvalodu studiju organizēšanu. [University of Latvia order No. 1/184 on organising foreign language studies, 29.06.2015].

Latvijas Universitātes Stratēģiskais plāns [University of Latvia Strategic Plan] (2010–2020), Senāta 24.05.2010 lēmums Nr. 370 [Senate decision No. 370, 24.05.2010].

Latvijas Universitātes Valodu Politika [University of Latvia Language Policy], Senāta 28.06.2010. lēmums Nr. 20 [Senate decision No. 20, 28.06.2010].

LU 01.03.2013 Rīkojums 1/83 Par LU studiju programmu kvalitātes uzlabošanas plānu [University of Latvia Order No. 1/183 on study programme quality enhancement plan, 01.03.2013].

Ministru kabineta noteikumi Nr. 281, 2013. g. Noteikumi par valsts vispārējās vidējās izglītības standartu, mācību priekšmetu standartiem un izglītības programmas paraugiem. Rīgā 2013. gada 21. maijā. [Regulations of the Cabinet of Ministers No. 28, 2013 on state general secondary education standard, study subject standards and educational programme templates. Riga, 21 May 2013] Available from: http://likumi.lv/doc.php?id=257229#piel2&pd=1 [Accessed on 16 August 2015].

PTE General Score Guide (2012) London: Pearson. Available from: http://pearsonpte.com/pte-general/ [Accessed on 16 August 2015].

PTEA Score Guide (2015) London: Pearson. Available from: http://pearsonpte.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/PTEA_Score_Guide.pdf [Accessed on 16 August 2015].

The Revised Pearson Test of English General brochure. Available from http://pearsonpte.com/pte-general/ [Accessed on 16 August 2015].

Downloads

Published

2016-05-11

How to Cite

Karapetjana, I., Kuzmina, J., & Vinčela, Z. (2016). English Language Testing in Moodle: Step Towards University of Latvia Language Policy Implementation. Baltic Journal of English Language, Literature and Culture, 6, 47–58. https://doi.org/10.22364/BJELLC.06.2016.04

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>