Intertextuality and Interdiscursivity in Information Technologies Organisational Discourse

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22364/BJELLC.05.2015.07

Keywords:

information technologies organisational discourse, discourse analysis, intertextuality

Abstract

The paper reflects the results of the cross-sectional empirical research exploring the network of written genres in information technologies organisations. The theoretical basis for this research has been grounded in the English for Specific Purposes and the New Rhetoric genre schools. The empirical research method is a case study, discourse and frequency analysis. Firstly, semi-structured interviews with IT professionals from Latvia, Estonia, Belarus and Western Russia aimed to identify the recurrent genres pertinent to the domain were conducted. Secondly, the analysis of constitutive and manifest intertextual relations in the documents in question was performed. The obtained results highlight the significance of the social context and professional practice for conducting discourse analysis in the domain in order to uncover constitutive intertextual relations. They reveal that the genres in the network have hierarchical interdiscursive relations, with the system architecture being the dominating one. The linguistic means of manifest intertextual relations do not show high variation and indicate to the genres precedent or antecedent in the chronological chain.

References

Bawarshi, A. and Reiff, M. (2010) Genre: An Introduction to History, Theory, Research and Pedagogy. West Lafayette, Indiana: Parlor Press.

Bazerman, C., Bonini, A. and Figueiredo, D. (eds.) (2009) Genres in a Changing World. Fort Collins, Colorado: the WAC Clearinghouse, West Lafayette, Indiana: Parlor Press.

De Beaugrande, R. and Dressler, W. U. (1981) Introduction to Text Linguistics. London: Longman.

Berkenkotter, C. and Huckin, T. N. (1995) Genre Knowledge in Disciplinary Communication. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Association.

Bhatia, V. K. (1993) Analysing Genre. Harlow: Longman.

Bhatia, V. K. (1995) Genre-mixing in professional communication: The case of ‘private intentions’ v. ‘socially recognized purposes’. In P. Bruthiaux, T. Boswood and B. Bertha (eds.) Explorations in English for Professional Communication (pp. 1–19). Hong Kong: City University Hong Kong.

Bhatia, V. K. (1998) Intertextuality in Legal Discourse. JALT Publications Online. The Language Teacher. 22(11) Available from http://jalt-publications.org/old_tlt/files/98/nov/bhatia.html [Accessed on 24 August 2012].

Bhatia, V. K. (2004) Worlds of Written Discourse: A Genre-based View. London: Continuum International.

Bhatia, V. K. (2010) Interdiscursivity in professional communication. Discourse and Communication, 4: 32–50.

Devitt, A. J. (1991) Intertextuality in tax accounting: Generic, referential, and functional (pp. 336–357). In C. Bazerman and J. G. Paradis (eds.) Textual Dynamics of the Professions: Historical and Contemporary Studies of Writing in Professional Communities. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, WI.

Freeman A. and Medway, P. (eds.) (1994) Genre and the New Rhetoric. London: Taylor and Francis.

Grant, D., Hardy, C., Oswick, C. and Putnam, L. (2004) The SAGE Handbook of Organisational Discourse. London: Sage Publications.

Halliday, M. A. K (1994) An Introduction to Systemic Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold.

Heracleous, L. and Barrett M. (2001) Organisational change as discourse: Communicative actions and deep structures in the context of information technology implementation. Academy of Management Journal, 44 (4): 445–467.

Iedema, R. (2003) Discourses of Post-bureaucratic Organization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Kornetzki, A. (2012) Contrastive Analysis of News Text Types in Russian, British and American Business Online and Print Media. Berlin: Frank and Timme GmbH.

Kristeva, J. (1980) Desire in Language: A Semiotic Approach to Literature and Art. Trans. by A. Jardine, L.S. Roudiez and T. Gora. New York: Columbia University Press.

Kuzmina, J. (2014) Genre Contextualisation and Rhetorical Organisation Aspects in English Written Communication for Information Technologies. Unpublished doctoral thesis. Riga: University of Latvia.

Lemke, J. (2005) Intertextuality and educational research (pp. 3–17). In D. Bloome and N. Shuart-Faris (eds.) Uses of Intertextuality in Classroom and Educational Research. Greenwich, Conn: Information Age Publishing.

Martin, J. R. (1997) Analysing Genre: Functional Parameters. Genre and Institutions: Social Processes in the Workplace and School (pp. 3–39). Frances Christie and J. R. Martin (eds.). London: Cassell.

Miller, C. (1984) Genre as social action. Speech, 70 (2): 151–167.

Mumby, D, and Clair, R. (1997) Organisational discourse (pp. 181–205). In T. A. van Dijk (ed.) Discourse as Structure and Process. Discourse Studies (2). London: Sage.

Paltridge, B. (1996) Genre, text type and the language classroom. ELT Journal, 50 (3): 237–243.

Spinuzzi, C. (2004) Describing assemblages: Genre sets, systems, repertoires and ecologies. In Computer Writing and Research Lab. White Paper Series. Essays and Addresses. New York: Macmillan Publisher, Benjamins Publishing Company. Available from http://www.cwrl.utexas.edu/node/158 [Accessed on 28 August, 2012].

Stake, R. E. (1995) The Art of Case Study Research. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage.

Stake, R. E. (2005) Qualitative case studies. In N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln (eds.) the Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research, 3rd edit. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage.

Swales, J. M. (1990) Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Swales, J. M. (2004) Research Genres: Exploration and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Xin, B. (2000) Intertextuality from a Critical Perspective. Suzhou: Suzhou University Press.

Downloads

Published

2015-06-05

How to Cite

Kuzmina, J. (2015). Intertextuality and Interdiscursivity in Information Technologies Organisational Discourse. Baltic Journal of English Language, Literature and Culture, 5(Riga: University of Latvia, 2015. 112 pa), 75–89. https://doi.org/10.22364/BJELLC.05.2015.07