Common Errors in the Use of English Verb Forms
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22364/BJELLC.04.2014.01Keywords:
grammatical errors, finite verb forms, English as a foreign language, first-year, tertiary level, tense, aspect, voiceAbstract
English has been taught as the first foreign language in the schools of Latvia for more than 10 years and is a compulsory subject from the age of nine, but university professors frequently observe that undergraduates who study English make verb errors when both formal and informal register is required. Therefore, the goal of the research was to find the common errors in the use of English finite verb forms and explain their causes. Research participants were first-year students who have studied English for at least ten years at school and now are majoring in language and business studies at a university in Latvia. A case study was used as a research method. Fifty students’ tests on the use of English verb tense, aspect and voice forms were analysed. A questionnaire survey was applied to analyse the potential causes of the verb errors the students make. The analysis allows us to conclude that the most common errors are in the use of the verb aspect forms, followed by the use of the verb tense forms, and that they can be classified as intralingual errors. The most typical causes of these errors are simplifications, the fact that some students have not yet reached the required language level for advanced studies and the use of English, the students’ misconceptions about their real knowledge of verb forms, lack of independent learning habits and also the metalanguage to deal with tertiary level tasks.
References
Ariel, M. (2009) Discourse, grammar, discourse. Discourse Studies, 11 (1): 5-36. Available from http://dis.sagepub.com/content/11/1/5 [Accessed on November 22, 2012].
Beyer, T. and Hudson Kam, C. L. (2009) Some cues are stronger than others: The (non)-interpretation of 3rd person present -s as a tense marker by 6- and 7-year olds. First Language, 29: 208-227.
Bourke, J. M. (2005) The grammar we teach. Reflections on English Language Teaching, 4: 85-97.
Carter, R. and McCarthy, M. (2006) Cambridge Grammar of English. A Comprehensive Guide. Spoken and Written English Grammar Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chung, S.-F. (2005) A communicative approach to teaching grammar: theory and practice. The English Teacher, Vol. XXXIV, 33-50.
Dickins, P. M. R. and Woods, E. G. (1988) Some criteria for the development of communicative tasks. TESOL Quarterly, 22 (4), Dec.: 623-646.
Hinkel, E. (2004) Tense, aspect and the passive voice in L1 and L2 academic texts. Language Teaching Research, 8 (1): 5-29. Available from http://ltr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/8/1/5 [Accessed on November 22, 2012].
Ionin, T. and Wexler, K. (2002) Why is ‘is’ easier than ‘-s’?: acquisition of tense/agreement morphology by child second language learners of English. Second Language Research, 18 (2), 95-136.
Larsen-Freeman, D., Kuehn, T. and Haccius, M. (2002) Helping students make appropriate English verb tense-aspect choices. TESOL Journal, 11 (4): 3-9.
Leech, G. and Svartvik, J. (2002) A Communicative Grammar of English, 3rd ed. Harlow: Pearson Education.
Newby, D. (1998) Theory and practice in communicative grammar: a guide for teachers. In R. de Beaugrande, M. Grosman, and B. Seidlhofer (eds.) Language Policy and Language Education in Emerging Nations, Series: Advances in Discourse Processes (pp. 151-164), Vol. LXIII, Stamford, Connecticut: Ablex Publishing Corporation. Avaiblable from http://books.google.com/; http://www.beaugrande.com/Slovenia%201.htm [Accessed on November 22, 2012].
Oshita, H. (2000) What is happened may not be what appears to be happening: a corpus study of ‘passive’ unaccusatives in L2 English. Second Language Research 16 (4): 293-324. DOI: 10.1177/026765830001600401. Available from http://slr.sagepub.com/content/16/4/293 [Accessed on November 22, 2012].
Purpura, J. E. (2004) Assessing Grammar. J. C. Alderson and L. F. Bachman (eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Reid, J. (2000) The Process of Composition, 3rd ed. New York: Longman.
Richards, J. C. and Schmidt, R. (2010) Longman Dictionary of Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 4th ed. Harlow: Pearson Education.
Rojas, C. O. (1995) Teaching communicative grammar at the discourse level. Encuentro, 8: 175-187. Available from http://www.encuentrojournal.org/english/textcit.php?textdisplay=274 [Accessed on November 22, 2012].
Song, L. (2012) On the variability of interlanguage. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2 (4): 778-783.
Swan, M. (1985) A critical look at the Communicative Approach (2). ELT Journal, 33 (2), April: 76-87.
Thomason, T. and Ward, G. (2010) Tools Not Rules: Teaching Grammar in the Writing Classroom. Houston: Strategic Book Publishing.
Vince, M. (1994) Advanced Language Practice. Heinemann English Language Teaching.
Wong, C. C. Y. and Barrea-Marlys, M. (2012) The role of grammar in communicative language teaching: An exploration of second language teachers’ perceptions and classroom practices. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 9 (1): 61-75. Available from http://e-flt.nus.edu.sg/ [Accessed on May 17, 2013].
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.