Testing the Speaking Ability at Oral Exams in Departments of English Studies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22364/BJELLC.03.2013.04Keywords:
speaking, testing, oral examinations, communicative abilityAbstract
The paper discusses the problem of assessing spoken English production starting from the theoretical deliberations on testing the communicative ability. In the empirical part, the author reports on the two approaches to testing the students’ oral performance at the final oral examinations in the Departments of English Studies at the University of Wrocław and the Higher Vocational School in Nysa, both located in the south-west of Poland. The impact of preparation time, the examination format, and testing techniques on the students’ oral performance were investigated in a qualitative study. Being an examiner the author examined the oral material collected during the two final examinations in the above mentioned Departments. The findings show that the two approaches to oral performance testing have an influence on the students’ productions. The paper concludes with some recommendations for the examiners related to the introduction of a more complex testing system in which a versatile student-student and student-teacher format and at least two different testing techniques are used. Additionally, the allocation of a relatively short time for students to prepare at an oral examination is advocated for enhancing natural everyday communication which is a priority in the currently dominant communicative approach to foreign language learning and teaching.
References
Bachman, L. F. (1990) Fundamental Considerations in Language Testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bachman, L. F. and Palmer, A. S. (1982) The construct validation of some components of communicative proficiency. TESOL Quarterly, 16 (4): 449-65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3586464
Bachman, L. F. and Cohen, A. D. (1998) Interfaces Between Second Language Acquisition and Language Testing Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524711
Broadfoot, P. (2005). Dark alleys and blind bends. Testing the language of learning. Language Testing, 22 (2): 123-141. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1191/0265532205lt302oa
Canale, M. and M. Swain. (1980) Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1: 1-47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/I.1.1
Canale. M. (1983) On some dimensions of language proficiency. In J. W. Oller, Jr (ed.) Issues in Language Testing Research (pp. 333-42). Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House.
Candlin, C. N. (1986). Explaining communicative competence limits of testability? In C. W. Stansfield (ed.) Toward Communicative Competence Testing: Proceedings of the Second TOEFL Invitational Conference (pp. 38-57). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
Carroll, J. B. (1961) Fundamental considerations in testing for English language proficiency of foreign students. In Testing the English Proficiency of Foreign Students (pp. 30-40). Washington, DC. Center for Applied Linguistics.
Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment. (2002) Council of Europe: Cambridge University Press.
Faerch, C. and Kasper, G. (1984) Two ways of defining communication strategies. Language Learning 34, (1): 45-63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1984.tb00995.x
Harmer, J. (2001) Writing English Language Tests. Essex: Pearson Education Limited.
Harris, D. P. (1969) Testing English as a Second Language. New York: Mc Graw-Hill.
Heaton, J. B. (1988) Writing English Language Tests. Harlow, Essex: Longman.
Hymes, D. H. (1972) On communicative competence. In J.B Pride and J. Holmes (ed.) Sociolinguistics (pp. 269-29). Harmondworth: Penguin.
Hymes, D. H. (1973) Toward linguistic competence. Texas Working Papers in Sociolinguistics, Working Paper, 16. Austin, Texas: Center for Intercultural Studies in Communication, and Department of Anthropology, University of Texas. Available from http://azargoshnasp.net/languages/talyshi/TALYSHSUMGAYIT.pdf [Accessed January 3, 2013].
Hymes, D. H. (1982) Toward Linguistic Competence. Philadelphia, Pa. Graduate School of Education, University of Pennsylvania.
Komorowska, H. (2002) Sprawdzanie umiejętności w nauce języka obcego – kontrola – ocena – testowanie. Warszawa: Fraszka Edukacyjna.
Kramsch, C. (1986) From language proficiency to interactional competence. The Modern Language Journal, 70 (4): 366-372. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1986.tb05291.x
Krypsin, W. J. and Feldhusen, J. F. (1974) Developing Classroom Tests: a Guide for Writing and Evaluating Test Items. Mineapolis, Minn: Burgess.
Lado, R. (1961) Language Testing. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Madsen, H. S. (1983) Techniques in Testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Munby, J. (1978) Communicative Syllabus Design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Savignon, S. J. (1983). Communicative Competence: Theory and Classroom Practice. Reading, Mass. Addison-Wesley.
Sercu, L. and Paran, A. (2010). Testing the Untestable in Language Education. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Tarone, E. E. (1981) Some thoughts on the notion of communicative strategy. TESOL Quarterly 15: 285-295. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3586754
Widdowson, H. G. (1983) Learning Purpose and Language Use. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
