What is the Meaning of School/University Essay and Related Terms in English and Latvian?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22364/BJELLC.03.2013.03Keywords:
contrastive analysis, school/university essay writing in EFL and Latvian, genre, rhetorical patternsAbstract
In the constantly changing world, teachers and researchers of academic writing of English as a foreign language face the problem of differences in writing in the target language and the students’ first language. They need not only to teach, but also to report on the contrastive research of writing in local and international conferences. Researchers encounter the problem of seemingly similar terms having a different meaning in the two languages. Thus, the paper aims at investigating the correspondence between the terms school/university essay writing in English (a foreign language) and their counterparts in Latvian (the native language) as used in theoretical literature. The analysis of the sources published in Latvia since the 1930s until today reveals that there is a tendency to introduce new terms, change the meanings of the existing ones and specify the conventions of essay organization under the influence of the English academic writing traditions. However, these new terms are applied somewhat differently, and the terms as such may vary depending on the personal views of the authors.
References
Afful, J. B. A. (2006). Introductions in examination essays: The case of two undergraduate courses. Across the Disciplines, 3, February 21. Available from http://wac.colostate.edu/atd/articles/afful2006.cfm [Accessed on March 6, 2008]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37514/ATD-J.2006.3.1.05
Andrews, R. (2010) Argumentation in Higher Education. Improving Practice Through Theory and Research. London: Routledge.
Anševics, E. (1932) 5 par domrakstu! Šis tas par to, kā raksta labu domrakstu. Rīgā: Valters un Rapa.
Atkinson, D. and Ramanathan, V. (1995) Cultures of writing: An ethnographic comparison of L1 and L2 university writing/language programs. TESOL Quarterly, 29 (3): 539-566. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3588074
Avilés, H. H. (2007) A genre analysis of students’ essay introductions, Fonael: 148-162. Available from http://www.fonael.org [Accessed on June 8, 2010].
Bacha, N. N. (2010) Teaching the academic argument in a university EFL environment. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9: 229-241. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2010.05.001
Bazerman, C. (1989) The Informed Writer. Using Sources in the Disciplines, 3rd edit. Boston a. o.: Houghton Mifflin Company.
Beaugrande, R. A. de and Dressler, W. (1981). Introduction to Text Linguistics. London and New York: Longman. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315835839
Beļickis, I., Blūma, D., Koķe, T., Markus, D., Skujiņa, V., Šalme, A. (2000) Pedagoģijas terminu skaidrojošā vārdnīca. Termini latviešu, angļu, vācu, krievu valodā. Rīga: Zvaigzne ABC.
Berkenkotter, C. (2002) Response(s) to William Grabe’s ‘Narrative and expository macro-genres’ (pp. 285-288). In A. M. Johns (ed.) Genre in the Classroom. Multiple Perspectives. Mahwah, New Jersey and London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Biaggini, E. G. (1962 [1936]) The Reading and Writing of English. London: Arrow Books.
Blaua, G. (1999) Man jāraksta domraksts. Rīga: Zvaigzne.
Dziļleja, K. (1924) Brīvie domraksti. Metodiska rokas grāmata skolotājiem ar 150 skolēnu darbu paraugiem. Rīga : Valters un Rapa,
Dziļleja, K. (1949) Domraksti. Metodiska rokasgrāmata latviešu valodas skolotājiem. [Vācija: b.i.].
Farneste, M. (2012) The Academic Essay as a Basis for Research Paper Writing. Rīga: LU Akadēmiskais apgāds.
Felš-Milberga, A. (2002) Domraksts sākumskolā. Teorija, Pieredze, Prakse. Rīga: Raka.
Flowerdew, L. (2000) Using a genre-based framework to teach organizational structure in academic writing. ELT Journal, 54 (4): 369-378. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/54.4.369
Gillett, A. Hammond, A. and Martala, M. (2009) Inside Track. Successful Academic Writing. Harlow: Pearson Longman.
Grabe, W. and Kaplan, R. B. (1996) Theory and Practice of Writing. Applied Linguistics and Language Study. Harlow: Pearson Education.
Grabe, W. Narrative and expository macro-genres (pp. 249-268). In A. M. Johns (ed.) Genre in the Classroom. Multiple Perspectives. Mahwah, New Jersey and London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Graves, R. (1993) Composition in Canadian universities. Written Communication, 10 (1), January: 72-105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088393010001003
Guļevska, D. (ed.), (1987) Latviešu valodas vārdnīca. Rīga: Avots.
Hayakawa, S. I. (ed.) (1987) The Penguin Modern Guide to Synonyms and Related Words. London: Penguin Books.
Hoey, M. (2001) Textual Interaction. An Introduction to Written Discourse Analysis. London and New York: Routledge.
Johns, A. M. (2002) Introduction: genre in the classroom (pp. 3-13). In A. M. Johns (ed.) Genre in the Classroom. Multiple Perspectives. Mahwah, New Jersey and London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410604262
Johns, A. M. (2011) The future of genre in L2 writing: Fundamental, but contested, instructional decisions. Journal of Second Language Writing, 20: 5668. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2010.12.003
Kārkliņš, K. (1947) Domraksts taustkolā. (47.-51. lpp.) Kārkliņa redakcijā Metodisko rakstu krājums. Rīga: Fišbahas latviešu komitejas literatūras apgāds.
Kārkls, R. (1976) Sacerējumi – psihiskās darbības aktivizētāji. Rīga: Zvaigzne.
Kay, H. and Dudley-Evans, T. (1998) Genre: what teachers think. ELT Journal, 52 (4), October: 308-314. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/52.4.308
Kinginger, C. (2002) Defining the zone of proximal development in US foreign language. Applied Linguistics, 23 (2): 240-241. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/23.2.240
Kusel, P. A. (1992) Rhetorical approaches to the study of composition of academic essays. System, 20 (4): 457-469. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0346-251X(92)90058-B
Lāce, R. (2011) Padomdevējs domraksta autoram 7.-12. klasē. Rīga: Zvaigzne ABC.
Laimiņš, A (1894) Domu-raksti. Rokas grāmata skolotājiem. Rīga: I. Brigadera apgādībā.
Laure, A. (1975) Radošie rakstu darbi latviešu valodā 4.-8. klasē. Rīga.
Lee, D. Y. W. (2001) Genres, registers, text types, domains, and styles: clarifying the concepts and navigating a path through the BNC jungle. In Language Learning and Technology, 5 (3): 37-72. Available from http://llt.msu.edu/vol5num3/lee/default.html [Accessed on December 20, 2001].
Milzere, M. (2003) Domraksti un citi skolēnu domu raksti :domraksti, esejas, tēzes, anotācijas, reklāmteksti. Rīga : Zvaigzne ABC.
O’Rourke, S. T., Calvo, R. A. and McNamara, D. S. (2011). Visualizing topic flow in students’ essays. Educational Technology & Society, 14 (3): 4–15.
Paltridge, B. (1996) Genre, text type, and the language learning classroom. ELT Journal, 50 (3), July: 237-243. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/50.3.237
Paltridge, B. (2002) Genre, text type, and English for Academic Purposes. In A. M. Johns (ed.) Genre Classroom: Multiple Perspectives (pp. 73-90). Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Paltridge, B. (2004) Academic writing. Language Teaching, 37: 87-105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444804002216
Paltridge, B. (2006) Discourse Analysis. An Introduction. London: Continuum.
Pauliņš, O. (1974) Skolēnu sacerējumu teorija un mācīšanas metodika. Rīga: Zvaigzne.
Pauliņš, O., Rozenbergs, J. and Vilāns, O. (1978) Latviešu valodas mācības pamatkurss: palīglīdzeklis latviešu valodas apguvē. Rīga: Zvaigzne.
Ramāns, V. (1938) Latviešu valodas metodika pamatskolām. 2. izdev. Rīga: Latvijas vidusskolu Skolotāju kooperatīva izdevums.
Rex, L.; West Brown, D.; Denstaedt, L.; Haniford, L. and Schiller, L. (2005) Understanding and exercising one’s own grammar: Four applications of linguistic and discourse knowledge. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 4 (3), December: 111-140. Available: http://education.waikato.ac.nz/research/files/etpc/2005v4n3art7.pdf [Accessed on October 4, 2012].
Richards, J. C. and Schmidt, R. (2010). Longman Dictionary of Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics (4th edit.). Harlow: Pearson Education.
Skuja, A. (1938) Rakstniecības teorija (poētika) vidusskolām. Pielikums: Domraksti. 2. izdev. Rīga: grāmatu apgāds A. Gulbis.
Swales, J. (1990) Genre Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Swales, J. M. and Feak, C. B. (1994) Academic Writing for Graduate Students. A Course for Nonnative Speakers of English. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Urževica, S. (2010) Rokasgrāmata latviešu valodā. Svarīgākais, kas jāzina latviešu valodas skolotājiem. Zvaigzne: ABC.
Uysal, H. H. (2008) Tracing the culture behind writing: Rhetorical patterns and bidirectional transfer in L1 and L2 essays of Turkish writers in relation to educational context. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17: 183-207. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2007.11.003
Varghese, S. A. and Abraham, S. A. (2004) Book-length scholarly essays as a hybrid genre in science. Written Communication, 21 (2), April: 201-231. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088303262844
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
