The Role of Peer Assessment in Developing Adolescent Learners’ Autonomy

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22364/BJELLC.03.2013.02

Keywords:

learner autonomy, alternative assessment, peer assessment, adolescent learners

Abstract

The aim of language education is no longer limited to developing learners’ linguistic skills only. In order to promote language learning as a life-long process, a growing impact in the language classroom is placed on non-linguistic aspects, such as motivation or learner autonomy. The latter can be fostered in the classroom by means of alternative assessment methods, such as portfolio, project, observation and peer assessment. This article provides an account of a quasi­-experiment conducted in the first and second year of lower secondary school in Poland in order to investigate whether and to what extent the application of peer assessment affects the level of autonomy in adolescent learners aged 13-14. The study is based on mixed methods research comprising both quantitative and qualitative data elicitation tools such as a questionnaire, classroom observation and interviews. The applied methodology helped to discover that although the overall level of autonomy did not change as the result of the treatment, a number of autonomous behaviours emerged. It can be concluded that peer assessment does not suffice to foster autonomy in adolescent learners; still, it might appear as a useful element of a wide­-ranging teaching scheme aiming at involving learners in the teaching and learning processes.

References

Birenbaum, M. and Dochy, F. (1996). Alternatives in Assessment of Achievements, Learning Processes and Prior Knowledge. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B. and William, D. (2003). Assessment for Learning: Putting It into Practice. Maidenhead: Open University Press.

Boud, D. (1988). Moving towards autonomy. In D. Boud (ed.) Developing Student Autonomy in Learning (pp. 17-39). London: Kogan Page Ltd.

Breen, P. and Mann, S. (1997). Shooting arrows at the sun: Perspectives on a pedagogy for autonomy. In P. Benson, and P. Voller (eds.) Autonomy and Independence in Language Learning (pp. 132-149). London: Longman.

Brown, J. and Hudson, T. (1998). The alternatives in language assessment. TESOL Quarterly 32(4), 653-675.

Cheng, W. and Warren, M. (2005). Peer assessment of language proficiency. Language Testing 22(1), 93-121.

Council of Europe. (2003). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages.

Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Czura, A. (2010). The Influence of Assessment Type on the Development of Autonomy in Lower Secondary School Learners. Unpublished PhD dissertation. Wrocław: University of Wrocław.

Dickinson, L. (1992). Learner Autonomy 2: Learner Training for Language Learning.

Dublin: Authentik.

Fox, J. (2008). Alternative assessment. In E. Shohamy and N. Hornberger (eds.) Enyclopedia of Language and Education. Volume 7, Language Testing and Assessment (pp. 97-108). New York: Springer Science.

Holec, H. (1981). Autonomy in Foreign Language Learning. Oxford: Pergamon.

Jarząbek, A. (2008a). Wokół pilotażowego egzaminu z języka obcego w gimnazjum. Problemy badawcze. Języki Obce w Szkole 1, 66-68.

Kohonen, V. (1999). Authentic assessment in affective foreign language education. In J. Arnold (ed.) Affect in Language Learning (pp. 279-294). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Larsen-Freeman, D. and Long, M. (1991). An Introduction to Second Language Acquisition Research. New York: Longman.

Legutke, M. and Thomas, H. (1991). Process and Experience in the Language Classroom. London: Longman Group UK.

Little, D. (2003). Learner autonomy and public examinations. In D. Little, J. Ridley and E. Ushioda (eds.) Learner Autonomy in the Foreign Language Classroom: Teacher, Learner, Curriculum and Assessment (pp. 223-233). Dublin: Authentik.

Little, D. and Perclová, R. (2001). The European Language Portfolio: A Guide for Teachers and Teacher Trainers. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.

Michońska-Stadnik, A. (2000). Attitudes to learner autonomy. IATEFL Research SIG. Special Joint Issue. June 2000, 67-71.

Pawlak M. (2004). Autoniomia studenta anglistyki – deklaracje a rzeczywistość. In M. Pawlak (ed.) Autonomia w nauce języka obcego (pp. 173-191). Poznań-Kalisz: Wydział Pedagogiczno­Artystyczny UAM w Poznaniu.

Sheerin, S. (1997). An exploration of the relationship between self-access centres: changing roles? In P. Benson and P. Voller (eds.) Autonomy and Independence in Language Learning (pp. 54-65). London: Longman.

Shohamy, E. (1996). Language testing: matching assessment procedures with language knowledge. In Birenbaum, M. and F. Dochy (eds.) Alternatives in Assessment of Achievements, Learning Processes and Prior Knowledge (pp. 143-160). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishing.

Wilczyńska, W. (1999). Uczyć się czy być nauczanym? O autonomii w przyswajaniu języka obcego. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.

Downloads

Published

2013-10-24

How to Cite

Czura, A. (2013). The Role of Peer Assessment in Developing Adolescent Learners’ Autonomy. Baltic Journal of English Language, Literature and Culture, 3, 20–32. https://doi.org/10.22364/BJELLC.03.2013.02