Loneliness and Humour in Azi̇z Nesi̇n and Neil Simon: a comparative study

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22364/BJELLC.14.2024.08

Keywords:

humour, loneliness, comedy, Hadi Öldürsene Canikom!, The Odd Couple

Abstract

This comparative study explores how Aziz Nesin and Neil Simon, representing different literary canons, treat and reflect upon the incorporation of loneliness and humour in Hadi Öldürsene Canikom! [Let’s Kill Me Honey!] (1970) and The Odd Couple (1965), respectively. Both playwrights examine the loneliness that has caught urbanised and atomised humans in two metropolises: Istanbul and New York. Simon deals with the values, concerns, lifestyles, aspirations and problems of middle-class people in his plays with domestic realism. In contrast, Nesin’s plays explore lower-working-class people’s values, concerns and struggles. Moreover, it focuses on how Nesin and Simon employ humour, as a Lingua Franca of comedy, in their works. The study emphasises the two playwrights’ incorporation of the humour theories of superiorityincongruity and relief into the selected dramatic texts. The interactions between the characters in the two plays are analysed according to the three traditional humour theories by assuming a discourse-analytic approach. The study has exhibited that in Hadi Öldürsene Canikom, all the humour theories have been explicitly observed. The humour largely stems from a case of mistaken identity, which creates incongruity. On the other hand, in The Odd Couple, humour is primarily evoked due to the incongruous characteristics of the roommates abandoned by their wives.

Author Biographies

  • Ömer Şekerci, Süleyman Demirel University

    Ömer Şekerci (Prof.) has been working at Süleyman Demirel University, Türkiye since 2000. His main research interests are modern drama studies, linguistics, pragmatics, literary criticism, discourse analysis and literary theory.

  • Müjde Demiray, Süleyman Demirel University

    Müjde Demiray (PhD candidate) has been working at Süleyman Demirel University, Türkiye since 2019 and is currently doing her PhD on modern drama. Her research includes modern drama studies, linguistics, pragmatics, and discourse analysis.

References

Alberti, F. B. (2019) A Biography of Loneliness: the history of emotion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Bergson, H. (1980) Laughter: an essay on the meaning of the comic. In W. Sypher (ed.) Comedy (pp. 61-193) Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.

Berkowitz, M. G. (2013) American Drama of the Twentieth Century. New York, NY: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315846729

Bier, J. (1968) The Rise and Fall of American Humour, 1st ed. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart.

Billig, M. (2005) Laughter and Ridicule: towards a social critique of humour. London: Sage Publications. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446211779

Bryer, R. J. & Siegel, B. (2019) Conversations with Neil Simon. Mississippi: University of Press Mississippi. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315050256-18

Chanksy, D. (2015) Kitchen Sink Realisms, Domestic Labour, Dining, and Drama in American Theatre. Iowa: Iowa University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/book42107

Clark, M. (1970) Humour and incongruity. Philosophy, 45: 20-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S003181910000958X

Critchley, S. (2002) On Humour: thinking in action. London: Routledge.

Egri, L. (1960) The Art of dramatic Writing. New York: Simon & Schuster.

Freud, S. ([1905] 2001) Jokes and their relation to the unconscious, In J. Strachey (ed.) The Standard Edition of the Complete Works of Sigmund Freud, Vol. 24. London: Vintage.

Genova, D. (2016). ‘Ha-Ha’ and ‘Really?’ or about the serious in the humourous in the TV comedy show Masters of the AIR. Baltic Journal of English Language, Literature and Culture, 6: 35-46. https://doi.org/10.22364/BJELLC.06.2016.03 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22364/BJELLC.06.2016.03

Hajdu, P. (2019) World drama. Neohelicon, 46: 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11059-019-00482-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11059-019-00482-5

Hobbes, T. (1840) Human nature. In W. Molesworth (ed.) The English Works of Thomas Hobbes, Vol. 11 (pp. 1-77). London: John Bohn.

Kabacalı, A. (2007) Gözyaşından Gülmeceye Aziz Nesin [From Tears to Laughter Aziz Nesin]. Istanbul: Gürer Publications.

Kulka, T. (2007) The incongruity of incongruity theories of humour. Organon, 14 (3): 320-333.

Morreall, J. (2009) Comic Relief: a comprehensive philosophy of humour. Chicago: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444307795

Morreall, J. (1982) A new theory of laughter. Philosophical Studies, 42: 243-254. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00374037

Nathan A. S. (1958) Modern Literature and the religious Frontier. New York: Harber & Bros.

Nesin, A. (2016) Yol: Böyle Gelmiş Böyle Gitmez — I, Öz Yaşam Öyküsü. [The Road: that is the way he has come, but that is not the way he is leaving — I: An autobiography]. Istanbul: Nesin Yayınevi.

Nesin, A. (1973) Cumhuriyet Döneminde Türk Mizahı [Turkish Humour in the Republican Period]. Istanbul: Akbaba.

Palmer, J. (1994) Taking Humour Seriously. London: Routledge.

Simon, N. (1996) Rewrites: a memoir. New York: Touchstone.

Stott, A. (2014) Comedy, 2nd ed. London: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203795897

Şekerci, Ö. (2023) Culpeper’s impoliteness strategies in Neil Simon’s Biloxi Blues. Baltic Journal of English Language, Literature and Culture, 13: 125-141. https://doi.org/10.22364/BJELLC.13.2023.09 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22364/BJELLC.13.2023.09

Walden, D. (1980) Neil Simon: toward act III?. Melus, 7 (2): 77-86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/467087

Yüksel, A. (1997) Çağdaş Türk Tiyatrosundan On Yazar [Ten Writers in contemporary Turkish theater]. Istanbul: Mitos Boyut.

TEXTS ANALYSED

Nesin, A. (1970) Hadi Öldürsene Canikom! [Let’s kill me honey!]. Istanbul: Istanbul Matbaası.

Simon, N. (2010) The Odd Couple. New York: Samuel French, Inc.

Downloads

Published

2024-05-28

How to Cite

Şekerci, Ömer, & Demiray, M. (2024). Loneliness and Humour in Azi̇z Nesi̇n and Neil Simon: a comparative study. Baltic Journal of English Language, Literature and Culture, 14, 121-134. https://doi.org/10.22364/BJELLC.14.2024.08