Salem Trials (1692) in History and in Miller’s The Crucible: Investigating truth claims in historical narratives and drama
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22364/BJELLC.12.2022.01Keywords:
historiography, historical truth, representation, witchcraft, dramaAbstract
Arthur Miller’s The Crucible is, in the first instance, a literary reconstruction of a historical event: the Salem trials that took place in the village of Salem in Essex County, New England (today Danvers, Massachusetts) in 1692. As Miller explains in his autobiography Timebends (1987), and as is clear from his introduction to the play, he not only carried out scholarly research in preparation for writing the play, he also reflected explicitly on how he had used the historical material to reconstruct a story. The central issue in this investigation is the position taken by the play with regard to writing history – historiography – and to the question: what is historical truth? How does the play relate to the issues of representing history and historical truth? To answer these questions, I will, in this research, give an extensive overview of the historical debates about witchcraft in order to situate Miller’s position on this topic. Further, I will position Miller’s work within more general debates about historiography and the historian’s possibilities of rendering a historical ‘truth’.
References
Aune, J. A. (2003) Witchcraft as symbolic action in Early Modern Europe and America. Rhetoric & Public Affairs, 6 (4): 765–77.
Ben-Yehuda, N. (1981) Problems inherent in socio-historical approaches to the European witch craze. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 20 (4): 326–38.
Boyer, P. S., and Nissenbaum, S. (1997) Salem Possessed: The Social Origins of Witchcraft. New York: MJF Books.
Brown, D. C. (1993) The forfeitures at Salem, 1692. The William and Mary Quarterly, 50 (1): 85–111.
Cohn, N. (1975) Europe’s Inner Demons: An Enquiry Inspired by The Great Witch-Hunt. London: Sussex University Press.
Caporael, L. R. (1976) Ergotism: the Satan loosed in Salem? Science New Series, 192 (4234): 21–26.
Detweiler, R. (1975) Shifting perspectives on the Salem Witches. The History Teacher, 8 (4): 596–610.
Driver, T. F. (1960) Strength and weakness in Arthur Miller. The Tulane Drama Review, 4 (4): 45–52.
Fudge, T. A. (2006) Traditions and trajectories in the historiography of European witch hunting. History Compass, 4 (3): 488–527.
Garrett, C. (1977) Women and witches: patterns of analysis. Signs, 3 (2): 461–70.
Godbeer, R. (1992) The Devils Dominion: Magic and Religion in Early New England. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Gould, P. (1995) New England witch-hunting and the politics of reason in the Early Republic. The New England Quarterly, 68 (1): 58–82.
Grund, P. (2007) From tongue to text: the transmission of the Salem witchcraft examination records. American Speech, 82 (2): 119–50.
Hall, D. D. (1985) Witchcraft and the limits of interpretation. The New England Quarterly, 58 (2): 253–81.
Hansen, C. (1969) Witchcraft at Salem. New York: George Braziller.
Hiltunen, R. (1996) ‘Tell me, be you a Witch?’: questions in the Salem witchcraft trials of 1692. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, 9 (1): 17–37.
Hoak, D. (1983) The great European witch-hunts: a historical perspective. American Journal of Sociology, 88 (6): 1270–74.
Horsley, R. A. (1979) Who were the witches? The social roles of the accused in the European witch trials. The Journal of Interdisciplinary History, 9 (4): 689–715.
Karlsen, C. F. (1987) The Devil in the Shape of a Woman: Witchcraft in Colonial New England. New York: Norton.
King, E. W. and Mixon Jr., F. G. (2010) Religiosity and the political economy of the Salem witch trials. The Social Science Journal, 47 (3): 678–88.
Korsten, F. W. (2012) Vondel’s dramas: ways of relating present and past. In J. Bloemendal and F.-W. Korsten (eds.) Joost van den Vondel (1587–1679): Dutch Playwright in the Golden Age, Vol. 1 (pp. 23–47). Boston, Leiden: Brill.
Latner, R. (2006) ‘Here are no Newters’: Witchcraft and religious discord in Salem village and Andover. The New England Quarterly, 79 (1): 92–122.
Macfarlane, A. (1970) Witchcraft in Tudor and Stuart England: A Regional and Comparative Study. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Miller, A. (2010) The Crucible. Methuen Drama Student Editions. London: Methuen Drama.
Miller, A. (1978) Introduction to the ‘Collected Plays. In Robert A. Martin (ed.) The Theater Essays of Arthur Miller (pp. 113–70). New York: The Viking Press.
Miller, A. and Gelb, P. (1958) Morality and modern drama. Educational Theatre Journal, 10 (3): 190–202.
Norton, M. B. (2003) In the Devils Snare: The Salem Witchcraft Crisis of 1692. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Rajakrishnan, V. and Miller, A. (1980) ‘After commitment: An interview with Arthur Miller.’ Theatre Journal, 32 (2): 196–204.
Reed, I. (2007) Why Salem made sense: culture, gender, and the Puritan persecution of witchcraft. Cultural Sociology, 1 (2): 209–34.
Reis, E. (1995) The devil, the Body, and the feminine soul in Puritan New England. The Journal of American History, 82 (1): 15–36.
Robbins, R. H. (1959) The Encyclopedia of Witchcraft and Demonology. London: Peter Nevill Limited.
Samuelson, D. R. (1998–99) Hart Devlin and Arthur Miller on the legal enforcement of morality. Denver University Law Review, 76: 189–215.
Savelle, M. (1969) Chadwick Hansen. Witchcraft at Salem, pp. xvii, 252 (New York: George Braziller, 1969). The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 386 (1): 180–80.
Starkey, M. L. (1966) The Congregational Way: The Role of the Pilgrims and their Heirs in Shaping America. New York: Doubleday.
Thomas, K. (1971) Religion and the Decline of Magic: Studies in Popular Beliefs in Sixteenth and Seventeenth-Century England. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.
Weisman, R. (1984) Witchcraft, Magic, and Religion in Seventeenth-Century Massachusetts. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
Woolf, A. (2000) Witchcraft or Mycotoxin? The Salem witch trials. Clinical Toxicology, 38 (4): 457–60.
Young, M. M. (1989) The Salem witch trials 300 years later: How far has the American legal system come? How much further does it need to go? Tulane Law Review, 64: 235–58.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 University of Latvia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
