Technoscience vs. Teknon-Science: The Tragedy Of The Female Scientist In Cynthia Ozick’s Puttermesser And Xanthippe
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22364/BJELLC.12.2022.02Keywords:
Cynthia Ozick, technoscience, technofeminism, Puttermesser and Xanthippe, childbirth metaphor, female scientist as procreator, golemAbstract
This paper aims to explore from a technofeminist standpoint this failure to enunciate a ‘feminine’ technoscientific praxis in the Puttermesser and Xanthippe episode of Cynthia Ozick’s 1997 ‘serial’ novel The Puttermesser Papers. In particular, there is a tragic failure to integrate procreative ethos and creative technoscience: when the latter is placed in the service of the former, the curse of Frankenstein rears its ugly head, and catastrophe ensues. The female scientist, a Jewish polymath like Ruth Puttermesser who creates a female golem to save New York, in releasing procreativity from the necessity of heterosexual reproduction, unwittingly unleashes a plague of ‘hyperfemininity’ that threatens to destroy culture. Thus, the break from the biological restraints of procreation and the establishment of a utopian femarche (female rule) are deconstructed, parodied, and retrospectively opposed as destructive, while the figure of the female savant / scientist emerges as a tragic one, torn between the need to nurture, and the catastrophic consequences of that need.
References
Aristophanes (391 B.C.) The Ecclesiazousae. Available from http://classics.mit.edu/Aristophanes/eccles.html [Accessed on 26 February 2022].
Aristophanes (411 B.C.) Lysistrata. J. Lindsay (ed. and transl.). Available from Aristophanes, Lysistrata, line 1 (tufts.edu) [Accessed on 26 February 2022].
Attebery, B. (2000) Science fiction and the gender of knowledge. In A. Sawyer and D. Seed (eds.) Speaking Science Fiction (pp. 131–143). Liverpool: Liverpool University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5949/liverpool/9780853238348.003.0012
Baer, E. R. (2012) The Golem Redux: From Prague to Post-Holocaust Fiction. Detroit: Wayne State University Press.
Bovri, B. (2011) ‘Man, you split wood like a girl.’ Gender Politics in ‘Y: The Last Man’. Ph.D. Thesis. Ghent University.
Creed, B. (2015) The Monstrous-Feminine: Film, Feminism, Psychoanalysis. London and New York: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429236143
Dokou, C. and Walden, D. (1996) The pagan condemnation and orthodox redemption of rabbi Isaac Kornfeld. Studies in American-Jewish Literature, 15: 6–16.
Friedman, L. S. (1991) Understanding Cynthia Ozick. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
Friedman, S. S. (1991) Creativity and the childbirth metaphor: gender difference in literary discourse. In R. R. Warhol and D. Price-Herndl (eds.) Feminisms: An Anthology of Literary Theory and Criticism (pp. 371–396). New Jersey: Rutgers University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36019/9780813568409-030
Kauvar, E. M. (1993) Cynthia Ozick’s Fiction: Tradition and Invention. Bloomington, Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
Kristeva, J. (1982) Powers of Horror: An Essay on Abjection (trans. L. S. Roudiez). European Perspectives series. New York: Columbia University Press.
Miles, J. (1997) ‘Heaven is hell’ – review of Ozick, Cynthia, The Puttermesser Papers. New York Times, June 5: n.p. Available from https://archive.nytimes.com/www.nytimes.com/books/97/06/15/reviews/970615.15milest.html?scp=20&sq=jack%2520miles&st=cse [Accessed on 26 February 2022].
Ozick, C. (1997) The Puttermesser Papers: A Novel. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Pethes, N. (2005) Terminal men: biotechological experimentation and the reshaping of ‘the human’ in medical thrillers. New Literary History, 36 (2): 161–185. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/nlh.2005.0036
Rich, A. (1980) Compulsory Heterosexuality and Lesbian Existence. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 5 (4): 631–660. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/493756
Rosenthal, A. R. (2019) Clon’d, or a note on propagation. SubStance, 48 (148): 46–62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/sub.2019.0004
Sanai, L. (2013) The Puttermesser Papers, by Cyhtia Ozick — review. The Independent, Sunday 29th December: n.p. Available from https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/books/reviews/the-puttermesser-papers-by-cynthia-ozick-review-9028378.html [Accessed on 26 February 2022].
Schmeink, L. (2015) Frankenstein’s offspring: practicing science and parenthood in Natali’s Splice. Science Fiction Film and Television, 8 (3): 343–369. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3828/sfftv.2015.23
Sivan, M. (2003) Cynthia Ozick’s Puttermesser and Bleilip: dualism and redemption. American@, 1 (2): 90–105.
Strandberg, V. H. (1994) Greek Mind/Jewish Soul: The Conflicted Art of Cynthia Ozick. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
Szwydky, L. L. and Pribbernow, M. L. (2018) Women scientists in Frankenstein films, 1945–2015. Science Fiction Film and Television, 11 (2): 303–339. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3828/sfftv.2018.20
Theroux, P. (1983) The male myth. The New York Times Magazine, 27th November: 6.116. Available from https://www.nytimes.com/1983/11/27/magazine/the-male-myth.html [Accessed on 26 February 2022].
Wajcman, J. (2004) TechnoFeminism. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Yehuda, S. N. (2010) Was I born a golem? Bridges: A Jewish Feminist Journal, 15 (1): 27–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2979/BRI.2010.15.1.27
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 University of Latvia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.