Technoscience vs. Teknon-Science: The Tragedy Of The Female Scientist In Cynthia Ozick’s Puttermesser And Xanthippe

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22364/BJELLC.12.2022.02

Keywords:

Cynthia Ozick, technoscience, technofeminism, Puttermesser and Xanthippe, childbirth metaphor, female scientist as procreator, golem

Abstract

This paper aims to explore from a technofeminist standpoint this failure to enunciate a ‘feminine’ technoscientific praxis in the Puttermesser and Xanthippe episode of Cynthia Ozick’s 1997 ‘serial’ novel The Puttermesser Papers. In particular, there is a tragic failure to integrate procreative ethos and creative technoscience: when the latter is placed in the service of the former, the curse of Frankenstein rears its ugly head, and catastrophe ensues. The female scientist, a Jewish polymath like Ruth Puttermesser who creates a female golem to save New York, in releasing procreativity from the necessity of heterosexual reproduction, unwittingly unleashes a plague of ‘hyperfemininity’ that threatens to destroy culture. Thus, the break from the biological restraints of procreation and the establishment of a utopian femarche (female rule) are deconstructed, parodied, and retrospectively opposed as destructive, while the figure of the female savant / scientist emerges as a tragic one, torn between the need to nurture, and the catastrophic consequences of that need.

Author Biography

Christina Dokou, The National and Kapodistrian University of Athens

Dr. Christina Dokou is Assistant Professor of American Literature and Culture in the Department of English Language and Literature at the National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece. She is the author of several articles and book chapters on subjects including Greek myth in American literature, psychoanalytic criticism, Comics Studies, theoretical approaches to American Folklore, and Gender Studies. She is the co-editor of two scholarly volumes, The Periphery Viewing the World: Selected Papers the 4th International Conference of the Hellenic Association for the Study of English (Athens, Parousia, 2004), and The Letter of the Law: Justice, Literature and the Other (Berlin: Peter Lang, 2013). She has served, in various positions, on the board of the Fulbright Alumni in Greece and the Hellenic Association for the Study of English and is currently Secretary of the Board of the Hellenic Association for American Studies.

References

Aristophanes (391 B.C.) The Ecclesiazousae. Available from http://classics.mit.edu/Aristophanes/eccles.html [Accessed on 26 February 2022].

Aristophanes (411 B.C.) Lysistrata. J. Lindsay (ed. and transl.). Available from Aristophanes, Lysistrata, line 1 (tufts.edu) [Accessed on 26 February 2022].

Attebery, B. (2000) Science fiction and the gender of knowledge. In A. Sawyer and D. Seed (eds.) Speaking Science Fiction (pp. 131–143). Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.

Baer, E. R. (2012) The Golem Redux: From Prague to Post-Holocaust Fiction. Detroit: Wayne State University Press.

Bovri, B. (2011) ‘Man, you split wood like a girl.’ Gender Politics in ‘Y: The Last Man’. Ph.D. Thesis. Ghent University.

Creed, B. (2015) The Monstrous-Feminine: Film, Feminism, Psychoanalysis. London and New York: Routledge.

Dokou, C. and Walden, D. (1996) The pagan condemnation and orthodox redemption of rabbi Isaac Kornfeld. Studies in American-Jewish Literature, 15: 6–16.

Friedman, L. S. (1991) Understanding Cynthia Ozick. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.

Friedman, S. S. (1991) Creativity and the childbirth metaphor: gender difference in literary discourse. In R. R. Warhol and D. Price-Herndl (eds.) Feminisms: An Anthology of Literary Theory and Criticism (pp. 371–396). New Jersey: Rutgers University Press.

Kauvar, E. M. (1993) Cynthia Ozick’s Fiction: Tradition and Invention. Bloomington, Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.

Kristeva, J. (1982) Powers of Horror: An Essay on Abjection (trans. L. S. Roudiez). European Perspectives series. New York: Columbia University Press.

Miles, J. (1997) ‘Heaven is hell’ – review of Ozick, Cynthia, The Puttermesser Papers. New York Times, June 5: n.p. Available from https://archive.nytimes.com/www.nytimes.com/books/97/06/15/reviews/970615.15milest.html?scp=20&sq=jack%2520miles&st=cse [Accessed on 26 February 2022].

Ozick, C. (1997) The Puttermesser Papers: A Novel. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

Pethes, N. (2005) Terminal men: biotechological experimentation and the reshaping of ‘the human’ in medical thrillers. New Literary History, 36 (2): 161–185.

Rich, A. (1980) Compulsory Heterosexuality and Lesbian Existence. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 5 (4): 631–660.

Rosenthal, A. R. (2019) Clon’d, or a note on propagation. SubStance, 48 (148): 46–62.

Sanai, L. (2013) The Puttermesser Papers, by Cyhtia Ozick — review. The Independent, Sunday 29th December: n.p. Available from https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/books/reviews/the-puttermesser-papers-by-cynthia-ozick-review-9028378.html [Accessed on 26 February 2022].

Schmeink, L. (2015) Frankenstein’s offspring: practicing science and parenthood in Natali’s Splice. Science Fiction Film and Television, 8 (3): 343–369.

Sivan, M. (2003) Cynthia Ozick’s Puttermesser and Bleilip: dualism and redemption. American@, 1 (2): 90–105.

Strandberg, V. H. (1994) Greek Mind/Jewish Soul: The Conflicted Art of Cynthia Ozick. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

Szwydky, L. L. and Pribbernow, M. L. (2018) Women scientists in Frankenstein films, 1945–2015. Science Fiction Film and Television, 11 (2): 303–339.

Theroux, P. (1983) The male myth. The New York Times Magazine, 27th November: 6.116. Available from https://www.nytimes.com/1983/11/27/magazine/the-male-myth.html [Accessed on 26 February 2022].

Wajcman, J. (2004) TechnoFeminism. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

Yehuda, S. N. (2010) Was I born a golem? Bridges: A Jewish Feminist Journal, 15 (1): 27–32.

Downloads

Published

2022-07-05

How to Cite

Dokou, C. (2022). Technoscience vs. Teknon-Science: The Tragedy Of The Female Scientist In Cynthia Ozick’s Puttermesser And Xanthippe. Baltic Journal of English Language, Literature and Culture, 12, 20–29. https://doi.org/10.22364/BJELLC.12.2022.02