Introducing concepts: stairs of acceptance and project specific reputation score. Exploring public acceptance in three Finnish construction projects via large dataset media-analytics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37380/jisib.v12i2.951Keywords:
Data-analytics, public acceptance, project reputation, complex project stakeholder analysis, sentiment analysisAbstract
The opposition to a deployed technology in large construction projects can grow step by step when transferred from a global level to local project delivery. Large construction projects with specific technology implementations put pressure on local public acceptance and
community involvement. This pressure is transferred to project management, how to deal with the issue of stakeholder acceptance before, during, and after project execution. Hence, understanding public acceptance and project-specific reputation can prove beneficial. Utilized
mostly in the company Market Intelligence function(MI), modern large dataset media analytics enables mining technology-related sentiments on global, regional, or local project levels. This paper measures the media sentiment towards three large Finnish construction projects.
The specific interest is to investigate which stakeholder groups are visible through the editorial and social media and how these can be classified according to the level of required information or participation level. The aim is to gain a numerical value for project reputation, a concept belonging to the marketing field of studies. Relevant technology deployment indications are provided, and a stairs of acceptance concept is conceptualized to reflect the project-specific public acceptance. Specific needs to increase efforts at a local project level are indicated. The means to counteract local resistance can involve the mode of project execution or social marketing.
The new algorithm-based method for measuring public acceptance and the introduced stairs of acceptance concept may bring project-level benefits by providing the added focus for increasing public acceptance.
References
Aaltonen, K. (2011). Project stakeholder analysis as an environmental interpretation process. International Journal of Project Management, 29(2), pp. 165–183.
Aaltonen, K., Kujala, J., Havela, L. & Savage, G. (2015). Stakeholder Dynamics During the Project Front-End: The Case of Nuclear Waste Repository Projects. Project Management Journal, 46(6), pp. 15–41.
Aaltonen, K. & Kujala, J. (2010). A project lifecycle perspective on stakeholder influence strategies in global projects. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 26(4), 381–397.
Argenti, P. A., & Druckenmiller, B. (2004). Reputation and the corporate brand. Corporate reputation review, 6(4), 368–374.
Badewi, A. (2016). The impact of project management (PM) and benefits management (BM) practices on project success: towards developing a project benefits governance framework. International Journal of Project Management, 34(4), 761–778.
Bęben, R. (2015). The role of social marketing in overcoming the NIMBY syndrome. Journal of positive management, 6(1), 3–16.
Berman, S. L., Wicks, A. C., Kotha, S., Jones, T. M. (1999). Does Stakeholder Orientation Matter? The Relationship Between Stakeholder Management Models and Firm Financial Performance. Academy of Management Journal. 42(5), 488–506.
Bourne, L., & Walker, D. H. T. (2006). Visualizing Stakeholder Influence – Two Australian Examples. Project Management Journal, 37(1), 5–21.
Buah, E., Linnanen, L., & Wu, H. (2020). Emotional responses to energy projects: A new method for m and prediction beyond self-reported emotion measure. Energy, 190, 116210.
Brugha R. and Varvasovsky, Z. (2000). Stakeholder analysis: a review. Health Policy and Planning, 15(3), 338–345.
Carley, S. Konisky, D., Atiq, Z. Land, N. (2020) Energy infrastructure, NIMBYism, and public opinion: a systematic literature review of three decades of empirical survey literature. Environmental Research Letters, 15(9), 093007.
Cass, N., Walker, G. (2009). Emotion and rationality: The characterisation and evaluation of opposition to renewable energy projects, Emotion, Space and Society, 2(1), 62–69.
Chaudhary, M., H. Kumar, S. Kaushal, and A. K. Sangaiah. 2018. The case analysis on sentiment based ranking of nodes in social media space. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 7 (4): 4217–4236.
Colvin, R. M., Witt, G. B., Lacey, J. (2016). Approaches to identifying stakeholders in environmental management: Insights from practitioners to go beyond the ‘usual suspects’. Land Use Policy. 52, 266–276.
Correljé, A., Cuppen, E., Dignum, M., Pesch, U., & Taebi, B. (2015). Responsible Innovation in Energy Projects: Values in the Design of Technologies, Institutions and Stakeholder Interactions. Responsible Innovation 2, 183–200.
Devine-Wright P. (2012) Explaining “NIMBY” objections to a power line: the role of personal, place attachment and project-related factors. Environment and Behavior, 45(6), 761–781.
Dhaoui, C., C. M. Webster, and L. P. Tan. 2017. Social media sentiment analysis: lexicon versus machine learning. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 34 (6): 480–488.
Dong, Q., Chen, Y., Liang, L., & Chen, F. (2016). Social marketing in NIMBY facilities planning policy: lessons learned from Hangzhou, China’s unsuccessful municipal solid waste incinerator project. FEB-FRESENIUS ENVIRONMENTAL BULLETIN, 4823.
Eskerod, P., Jepsen, A. L. (2013). Project Stakeholder Management. Routledge, London, UK.
Gough, C., Taylor, I., Shackley, S. (2002). Burying Carbon under the Sea: An Initial Exploration of Public Opinions. Energy & Environment, 13(6), 883–900.
Gölz, S., Wedderhoff, O. (2018). “Explaining regional acceptance of the German energy transition by including trust in stakeholders and perception of fairness as socio-institutional factors. Energy Research & Social Science, 43, 96–108.
Hanger, S., Komendantova, N., Schinke, B., Zejli, D., Ihlal, A., & Patt, A. (2016). Community acceptance of large-scale solar energy installations in developing countries: Evidence from Morocco. Energy Research & Social Science, 14, 80–89.
Heldt, S., Budryte, P., Ingensiep, H. W., Teichgräber, B., Schneider, U., Denecke, M. (2016). Social pitfalls for river restoration: How public participation uncovers problems with public acceptance. Environmental Earth Sciences, 75, 1053.
Henjewele, C., Fewings, P. and D. Rwelamila, P. (2013). De-marginalising the public in PPP projects through multi-stakeholders management. Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction, 18(3), 210–231.
Hildebrand, J., Rau, I., Schweizer-Ries, P. (2012). Die Bedeutung dezentraler Beteiligungsprozesse für die Akzeptanz des Ausbaus erneuerbarer Energien—Eine Umweltpsychologische Betrachtung. Informationen zur Raumentwicklung, 9, 491–501.
Jepsen, A. L. Eskerod, P. (2009). Stakeholder analysis in projects: Challenges in using current guidelines in the real world. International Journal of Project Management, 27(4), 335–343.
Karlsen, J. T. (2002). Project Stakeholder Management. Engineering Management Journal, 14(4), 19–24.
Kokkinos K., Lakioti E., Papageorgiou E., Moustakas K., Karayannis V. (2018). Fuzzy Cognitive Map-Based Modeling of Social Acceptance to Overcome Uncertainties in Establishing Waste Biorefinery Facilities, Frontiers in Energy Research, 6, 112.
Kumar, P., & Singh, G. (2020). Using social media and digital marketing tools and techniques for developing brand equity with connected consumers. In Handbook of research on innovations in technology and marketing for the connected consumer (pp. 336–355). IGI Global.
Lehtinen, J., 2021. External engagement in complex projects. Doctoral Dissertation, Aalto University.
Li, T. H. Y., Ng, S. T., Skitmore, M. (2013). Evaluating stakeholder satisfaction during public participation in major infrastructure and construction projects: A fuzzy approach, Automation in Construction, 29, 123–135.
Manowong, E. & Ogunlana, S. (2010). Strategies and Tactics for Managing Construction Stakeholders. Chinyoio, E. (Ed.), Construction Stakeholder Management, John Wiley and Sons, United Kingdom, 121–137.
McCarthy, B. & Eagle, L. (2020). Winds of Change: Engaging with Conflicting Perspectives in Renewable Energy. In: Hay, R., Eagle, L., Bhati, A. (eds) Broadening Cultural Horizons in Social Marketing. Springer, Singapore.
McHugh, P., Domegan, C., Duane, S. (2018). Protocols for Stakeholder Participation in Social Marketing Systems. Social Marketing Quarterly, 24(3), 164–193.
McLeod, L., Doolin, B., MacDonell, S.G. (2012). A perspective-based understanding of project success. Project Management Journal, 43(5), 68–86.
Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience. Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), pp. 853–886.
Mok, K. Y., Shen, G. Q., Yang, R. J. & Li, C. Z. (2017). Investigating key challenges in major public engineering projects by a network-theory based analysis of stakeholder concerns: A case study, International Journal of Project Management, 35(1), pp. 78–94.
Mulyasari, F., Harahap, A. K., Rio, A. O., Sule, R., Kadir, W. G. A. (2021). Potentials of the public engagement strategy for public acceptance and social license to operate: Case study of Carbon Capture, Utilisation, and Storage Gundih Pilot Project in Indonesia. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 108, 103312.
Newcombe, R. (2003). From client to project stakeholders: a stakeholder mapping approach. Construction management and economics, 21(8), 841–848.
Nuortimo, K. Public acceptance in energy technology development and deployment. Opinion mining case study (Doctoral dissertation, University of Oulu).
Nuortimo, K. (2021). Hybrid approach in digital humanities research: a global comparative opinion mining media study (Doctoral dissertation, University of Oulu).
Olander, S. (2007). Stakeholder impact analysis in construction project management. Construction management and economics, 25(3), 277–287.
Olander, S. & Landin (2008). A comparative study of factors affecting the external stakeholder management process. Construction Management and Economics, 26(6), 553–561.
Olaleye, S. A., I. T. Sanusi, and J. Salo. 2018. Sentiment analysis of social commerce: a harbinger of online reputation management. International Journal of Electronic Business, 14 (2): 85–102.
Olawale, O. A., Oyedele, L. O. & Owolabi, H. A. (2020). Construction practitioners’ perception of key drivers of reputation in mega-construction projects. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 18(6), 1571–1592.
Parmar, B. L., Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., Wicks, A. C., Purnell, L., & De Colle, S. (2010). Stakeholder theory: The state of the art. Academy of Management Annals, 4(1), 403–445.
Raum, S., (2018). A framework for integrating systematic stakeholder analysis in ecosystem services research: Stakeholder mapping for forest ecosystem services in the UK. Ecosystem Services. 29(A), 170–184.
Reed, M. S., Graves, A., Dandy, N., Posthumus, H., Hubacek, K., Morris, J., Prell, C., Quinn, C. H., Stringer, L. C. (2009), Who’s in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management. Journal of Environmental Management. 90(5), 1933–1949.
Ren, X., Che, Y., Yang, K., & Tao, Y. (2016). Risk perception and public acceptance toward a highly protested Waste-to-Energy facility. Waste management, 48, 528–539.
Roddis, P., Carver, S., Dallimer, M., Norman, P., & Ziv, G. (2018). The role of community acceptance in planning outcomes for onshore wind and solar farms: An energy justice analysis. Applied energy, 226, 353–364.
Roloff, J. (2008). Learning from Multi-Stakeholder Networks: Issue-Focussed Stakeholder Management. Journal of Business Ethics, 82, 233–250.
Rowley, T. J. (1997). Moving beyond dyadic ties: a network theory of stakeholder influences. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), pp. 887–910.
Rust, R. T., Rand, W., Huang, M. H., Stephen, A. T., Brooks, G., & Chabuk, T. (2021). Real-time brand reputation tracking using social media. Journal of Marketing, 85(4), 21–43.Scheublin, F. J. M. (2001). Project alliance contract in The Netherlands. Building Research & Information, 29(6), 451–455.
Shaw, K., Hill, S. D., Boyd, A. D., Monk, L., Reid, J., & Einsiedel, E. F. (2015). Conflicted or constructive? Exploring community responses to new energy developments in Canada. Energy Research & Social Science, 8, 41–51.
Sovacool, B. K., & Ratan, P. L. (2012). Conceptualizing the acceptance of wind and solar electricity. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16(7), 5268–5279.
Stead, M., & Hastings, G. (2018). Advertising in the social marketing mix: getting the balance right. In Social Marketing (pp. 29–43). Psychology Press.
Sterry, P. & Sutrisna, M. (2007). Briefing and Designing Performing Arts Buildings: Assessing the Role of Secondary Project Stakeholders. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 3(4), 209–221.
Takim, R. (2009). The management of stakeholders’ needs and expectations in the development of construction project in Malaysia. Modern Applied Science, 3(5), 167–175.
Tapp, A. Nancarrow, C. & Davis, A. (2015). Support and compliance with 20 mph speed limits in Great Britain. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 31, 36–53.
Tcvetkov, P., Cherepovitsyn, A., Fedoseev, S. (2019). Public perception of carbon capture and storage: A state-of-the-art overview, Heliyon, 5(12), e02845.
Turkulainen, V., Aaltonen, K., & Lohikoski, P. (2015). Managing project stakeholder communication: the Qstock festival case. Project Management Journal, 46(6), 74–91.
Wang, X., & Huang, J. (2006). The relationships between key stakeholders’ project performance and project success: Perceptions of Chinese construction supervising engineers. International journal of project management, 24(3), 253–260.
Wang, W., L. Chen, K. Thirunarayan, and A. P. Sheth. 2012. Harnessing twitter ‘Big Data’ for automatic emotion identification. in Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust (PASSAT), 2012 International Conference on Social Computing (SocialCom), IEEE, Washington, DC. 587–592.
Williams, N. L., Ferdinand, N., & Pasian, B. (2015). Online stakeholder interactions in the early stage of a megaproject. Project Management Journal, 46(6), 92–110.
Wong-Parodi, G., Dowlatabadi, H., McDaniels, T., Ray, I. (2011). Influencing Attitudes toward Carbon Capture and Sequestration: A Social Marketing Approach. Environmental Science and Technology, 45(16), 6743–6751.
Xie, L.-l., Yang, Y., Hu, Y. and P. C. Chan, A. (2014), “Understanding project stakeholders’ perceptions of public participation in China’s infrastructure and construction projects: Social effects, benefits, forms, and barriers”, Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 21(2),
–240.
Yuan, H. (2017). Achieving Sustainability in Railway Projects: Major Stakeholder Concerns. Project Management Journal, 48(5), 115–132.
Yang, J., Shen, G. Q., Bourne, L., Ho, C. M. F. & Xue, X. (2011). A typology of operational approaches for stakeholder analysis and engagement, Construction Management and Economics, 29(2), 145–162.
Yang, J., Shen, G. Q., Ho, M., Drew, D. S., & Chan, A. P. C. (2009). Exploring critical success factors for stakeholder management in construction projects, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 15(4), 337–348.
Yang, R. J. (2014). An investigation of stakeholder analysis in urban development projects: Empirical or rationalistic perspectives. International Journal of Project Management, 32(5), pp. 838–849.
Zanjirchi, S. M., & Moradi, M. (2012). Construction project success analysis from stakeholders theory perspective. African Journal of Business Management, 6(15), 5218–5225.
Zervas, G., Proserpio, D., & Byers, J. W. (2021). A first look at online reputation on Airbnb, where every stay is above average. Marketing Letters, 32(1), 1–16.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
