Towards an environmental awareness model integrating formal and informal mechanisms – Lessons learned from the Demise of Nortel
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37380/jisib.v5i1.112Keywords:
Nortel, Competitive intelligence, Corporate Failure, Monitoring PracticesAbstract
This case study uses multiple lines of enquiry to better understand how Nortel went from being a ‘global powerhouse’ at the turn of the century to filing for bankruptcy just nine years later. It tracks competitive intelligence as well as other environmental awareness capabilities of the company and theorizes on how they have contributed to its rise and fall. The findings suggest that Nortel was a company with significant environmental awareness capability in the early 90’s that had all but lost this competency by the year 2000, which impacted their ability to make decisions consistent with a changing environment. Through interviews with 48% of all Nortel officers that were there during the period of interest as well as other stakeholders, the researchers identify a two-layer typology that includes a set of cognitive factors as well as three broad categories of monitoring practices that can help companies better understand their environment: 1) formal external monitoring practices, such as competitive intelligence units; 2) informal external monitoring practices such as board meetings with members with industry connections and knowledge, and 3) internal monitoring practices with external insight capability, such as performance management reviews and accounting reports. Cognitive factors identified include decision maker orientation, as either technical or business, internal vs., internal focus, cognitive complexity and open mindedness.
References
Austen, Ian. (2009). Nortel Seeks Bankruptcy Protection. New York Times, January 14, 2009 as referenced on www.nytimes.com/2009/01/15/technology/companies/15nortel.html?_r=1&
Calof, Jonathan., Richards, Greg, Mirabeau, Laurent, Mouftah, Hussein, Mackinnon, Peter, Chapman, Peter (2014) An overview of the demise of Nortel networks and key lessons learned. http://sites.telfer.uottawa.ca/nortelstudy/files/2014/02/nortel-summary-report-and-executive-summary.pdf
Calof, Jonathan (2014). Evaluating competitive intelligence from the users perspective. Journal of Intelligence Studies in Business, 4 (3): 79-90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37380/jisib.v4i3.106
Eisenhardt KM. 1989. Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4): 532-550. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4308385
Gioia, D. A., Corley, K. G., & Hamilton, A. L. (2012). Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology. Organizational Research Methods, 16(1): 15-31 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428112452151
Fortune Magazine online. Meet the the market’s biggest loosers. http://archive.fortune.com/galleries/2010/fortune/1002/gallery.biggest_losers.fortune/ Accessed on April 8 2015.
Glaser,B.G.,& Strauss,A.(1964) Awareness con-texts and social interaction. American Sociological Association ,29 669–679. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2091417
Global Intelligence Alliance. GIA Intelligence Benchmarking Tool. https://www.globalintelligence.com/insights/world-class-market-intelligence/intelligence-benchmarking-tool. Accessed April 17, 2015.
Hogan, Scott. CI in High Tech Environments: A Practitioners View. Presentation made February 14 2001, Nortel Networks. http://www.fptt-pftt.gc.ca/pdf/Hogan.pdf Accessed April 19, 2015.
Langley A. (1999). Strategies for theorizing from process data. The Academy of Management Review 24(4): 691-710. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1999.2553248
MacDonald Larry (2000) Nortel Networks : How innovation and vision created a network giant. John Wiley and Sons. Canada.
Mackinnon, Peter, Chapman Peter and Mouftah, Hussein (2015) Nortel technology lens: Analysis and Observations. University of Ottawa School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science.
McFarland, Janet (2011). Enron and the biggest corporate governance scandals of the past decade. The Globe and Mail, November 27 as referenced on June 14 2014 at www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/careers/management/board-games-2011/enron-and-the-biggest-corporate-governance-scandals-of-the-past-decade/article640949/
Mellahi, K., & Wilkinson, A. (2004). Organizational Failure: A critique of recent research and a proposed integrative framework. International Journal of Management Reviews, 5/6(1), 21-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-8545.2004.00095.x
Patton MQ. 2002. Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods, Sage Publications: London, UK
Reardon, Marguerite. 2009. Nortel Files For Bankruptcy. http://www.cnet.com/news/nortel-files-for-bankruptcy/ accessed April 8 2015.
Sheppard, J. P., & Chowdhury, S. P. (2005). Riding the Wrong Wave: Organizational Failure as Failed Turnaround. Long Range Planning, 38, 239-260. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2005.03.009
Solberg Søilen, Klaus. (2014). A survey of users’ perspective s and preferences as to the value of JISIB - a spot - check Volume 4, No 2, 61-66 DOI: https://doi.org/10.37380/jisib.v4i2.98
Van de Ven AH, Poole SM. (1990). Methods for studying innovation development in the Minnesota Innovation Research Program. Organization Science 1(3): 313-335. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1.3.313
Yin RK. (2003). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Sage Publications: Newbury Park, CA
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2015 Journal of Intelligence Studies in Business
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).