New Tendencies in Operational Risk Management in Banks: Challenges and Opportunities

Authors

  • Jelena Sobanova University of Latvia
  • Marina Kudinska University of Latvia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22364/hssl.30.08

Keywords:

bank operational risk, operational risk management

Abstract

The importance of operational risk management in the bank increases every year. Banks need to take actions to prevent fraudulent activities, minimize errors in transactions, automate processes and improve data security. Ignoring operational risk procedures or failure to implement suitable control mechanisms could lead to unexpected losses, unsatisfied customers, and potentially regulatory sanctions, all of which could seriously harm bank’s reputation in a highly competitive market. A specific focus is on payments and security transactions, as they are linked to the biggest risks. Any regulatory driven project failure or IT project failure in the bank, insufficient project governance, failed implementation of a new system or failure in external data sources can lead to even bigger losses. After a review of the Basel Framework and the new set of standards of the upcoming changes to take effect as of 2023, the aim of this article is to elucidate the changes related to operational risk capital in banks and to ascertain the weakest points in operational risk management. Therefore, this topic is timely relevant, as the aim of the research is to manifest the possible changes withing operational risk management in banks, by gathering and analysing empirical evidence. This article is based on academic research and professional experience. The methods used in the research are comparison, generalization and graphical illustration of statistical information, identification of the main idea of regulatory frameworks and legal documentation. The main results and findings of the research are that banks will need to rethink the strategies of their capital management and this article emphasizes the importance of a redesigned approach towards operational risk assessment in Basel III and substantiates the efficiency of the proposed framework. With Basel III, each loss may cause more challenges, as will be considered twice, as the direct impact on profit/loss and direct impact on future operational risk capital. Another finding is that the biggest amounts of losses are related to corporate items events and according to the static data taken from ORX membership community, top five monthly losses are far from normal distribution. Important finding was that most of the banks were not prepared for COVID-19-pandemic and had to review operational risk procedures immediately to secure their business in working from home environment, meaning that gap in operational risk management existed already before COVID-19-pandemic.

References

BCBS, 2001. Working Paper on the Regulatory Treatment of Operational Risk [online] Available at: Working Paper on the Regulatory Treatment of Operational Risk - Basel Committee (Sep 2001) (bis.org)

BCBS, 2011. Operational risk: supervisory guidelines for the advanced measurement approaches. Bank for International Settlements. Available at: http://www.bis.org/publ/bcbs196.pdf

BCBS, Basel II: International Convergence of Capital Measurement and Capital Standards: A Revised Framework – Comprehensive Version, June 2006, [online] Available at: http://www.bis.org/pub/bcbs128.htm

BCBS, September 1998. Operational Risk Management, [online] Available at: https://www.bis.org/publ/bcbs42.pdf

Business Environment & Internal Control Factors (BEICFs), Industry Position Paper, Risk management Association, December 2008.

Chernobai, A., Ozdagli, A., Wang, J. Business complexity and risk management: Evidence from operational risk events in U.S. bank holding companies (2021). Journal of Monetary Economics 117, 418–440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2020.02.004

Cristea, M.-A. Operational risk management in banking activity (2021). Journal IBIMA Business Review. https://doi.org/10.5171/2021.969612 https://ibimapublishing.com/articles/JEERBE/2021/969612/

Diab, A. A.; Metwally, A., Alzakari, A. M., Fazal, A. Banks’ concurrent risks during the COVID-19 pandemic: A road map for risk officers and risk management (2022) Journal of Risk Management in Financial Institutions. Scopus - Document details - Banks’ concurrent risks during the COVID-19 pandemic: A road map for risk officers and risk management (lanet.lv)

Erzurumlu, Y. O., Avcı, G. The Impact of Bank’s Internal Governance Mechanism on Operational Loss: Evidence from Turkey. (2021). Iranian Economic Review. https://doi.org/10.22059/ier.2020.76096 https://ier.ut.ac.ir/error_page

Froot, K. A. Bank Capital and Risk Management: Operational Risks in Context. (2003). Presentation at the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston.

Hagstrom, R. G. (1994). The Warren Buffett Way: Investment Strategies of the World’s Greatest Investor. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Harmantzis, F. (2003). Operational Risk Management in Financial Services and the New Basel Accord, working paper, Stevens Institute of Technology.

Jongh E., de, Jongh D., de, Jongh R., de (2013). A review of operational risk in banks and its role in the financial crisis, Centre for Business Mathematics, and Informatics (BMI), North-West University South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences.

Jorion P. Value at Risk: The New Benchmark for Managing Financial Risk, 2006, NY, USA.

Muhtaseb, H., Eleyan, D. The role of management accounting practices in operational risk management: the case of Palestinian commercial banks. (2021). Journal of Operational Risk. https://doi.org/10.21314/JOP.2021.012 https://www.risk.net/journal-of-operational-risk/7898876/the-role-of-management-accounting-practices-in-operational-risk-management-the-case-of-palestinian-commercial-banks

O.R.X. Capital Benchmark 2021 summary report. Available at: https://members.orx.org/orx-publications/capital-benchmark-2021

Public Individual Quarterly Reports by Banks. Latvijas Banka. (2021). Available at: Banku_Publ_cet_4Q_2021_V3.xlsx (live.com)

PwC’s Global Economic Crime and Fraud Survey (2022). Available at: https://www.pwc.com/gx/en/services/forensics/economic-crime-survey.html

Santomero, A. (1997). Commercial Bank Risk Management: An Analysis of the Process, Journal of Financial Services Research, 12 (2/3), 83–115. Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Saputra, M. P. A., Sukono, Chaerani, D., Estimation of Maximum Potential Losses for Digital Banking Transaction Risks Using the Extreme Value-at-Risks Method (2022). Journal Risks, 10 (1), 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/risks10010010

Sound Practice Guidance - Risk Control Self-Assessment, Institute of Operational Risk, 2010.

Supervisory Banking Statistics. ECB, 2021. Available at: Supervisory Banking Statistics - Fourth quarter 2021 (europa.eu).

The growing threat of internal fraud. Barclays Bank. Available at: https://www.barclayscorporate.com/insights/fraud-protection/internal-fraud/

UK Financial Services Authority Operational Risk Corporate Governance Expert Group, 2005, The Use Test. Available at http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pubs/international/orsg_use_test.pdf and 2011 https://www.fca.org.uk/publication/guidance-consultation/guidance11.pdf

Wernz J. Bank Management and Control. Strategy, Pricing, Capital and Risk Management, 2nd ed. Switzerland, 2020.

Xu Y., Tan T. F., Netessine, S. The Impact of Workload on Operational Risk: Evidence from a Commercial Bank. (2021). Journal Management Science, 68 (4), 2668–2693.

Zeissler, A. G., Metrick A. JP Morgan chase London whale Z: Yale Program on Financial Stability Case Study, 2014. Available at: https://1library.net/document/z3mnw19y-jpmorgan-chase-london-whale-z-background-overview.html

Downloads

Published

2022-12-20