Managing Knowledge Transfer and Sharing within Intra-Organizational Structure


  • Harsh Chauhan University of Latvia
  • Henrijs Kalkis University of Latvia



Intra-organizational, knowledge, transfer, sharing, exchange


The literature review postulates the significance of knowledge transfer and sharing in the intra-organizational framework. The study operationalized Knowledge transfer, sharing and conjoint usage of knowledge exchange. Participation, contribution and attitude of managerial and non-managerial employees has shown discrepancies. Human traits, ownership of knowledge, insecurity of losing possession and position, distribution of knowledge, knowledge equality and biasness are most common hurdles of knowledge transfer. The paper theoretically examines previous researches and systematically carry out comprehensive literature analysis. The assessment of scientific theories are taken into consideration for developing the construct of paper. The selection of recognized academic references from various databases and journals have been evaluated methodologically. The analysis of scientific discussions and contribution from renowned authors have been used to finalize the concepts of literature review. The Integration of intra-organizational knowledge transfer, sharing and exchange balances the paper.


Albert, R., Jeong, H., Barabasi, A. L. (2000). Error and attack tolerance of complex networks. Nature, 406, 378–382.

Baldwin, A. (1959). The roles of an “ability” construct in a Theory of Behaviour. Talent and Society: New Perspectives in Identification of Talent. McClelland D., Baldwin A., Bronfenbrenner U., Strodtbeck F. (eds). Van Nostrand Reinhold: New York, 195–234.

Bales, K. F. (1950). A set of categories for the analysis of small group interaction. American Sociological Review, 15, 257–263.

Bales, K. F., Slater S. P. (1955). Role differentiation in small decision-making groups. Family, Socialization and Interaction Process. Parsons T., Slater P. E. (eds). Free Press: Glencoe, 259–306.

Berzonsky, M. D., Kuk, L. S. (2000). Identity status, identity processing style, and the transition to university. Journal of Adolescent Research, 15, 81–98.

Bougon, M. G., Weick, K. E., Binkhorst, D. (1977). Cognition in organizations: An analysis of the Utrecht jazz orchestra. Administrative Science Quarterly, 22, 606–639.

Burt, R. S. (1982). Social contagion and innovation: Cohesion versus structural equivalence. American Journal of Sociology, 88, 1287–1335.

Burt, R. (1992). Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA.

Cabrera, E. (2003). Social-psychological aspects of knowledge-sharing in organizations. Proceedings of 7th Conference on International Human Resource Management. Limerick.

Carley, K. M. (1999). On generating hypotheses using computer simulations. Systems Engineering, 2 (2), 69–77.

Chesbrough, H. W., Teece, D. J. (1996). When is virtual virtuous? Organizing for innovation. Harvard Business Review, 74 (1), 65–73.

Cohen, W., Levinthal, D. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 128–152.

Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundation of Social theory. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

Galbraith, J. R. (1973). Designing Complex Organizations. Addison-Wesley Reading MA.

Grant, R. M. (1996). Toward, a knowledge-based Theory of the Firm. Strategic Management Journal, 15, 365–385.

Ghoshal, S., Korine, H., Szulanski, G. (1994). Interunit communication in multinational corporations, Management Sciences, 40, 96–110.

Gulati, R., Gargiulo, M. (1999). Where do interorganizational networks come from? Amer. J. Sociology, 104, 1439–1493.

Hamel, G., Doz, Y., Prahalad, C. K. (1989). Collaborate with your competitors and win. Harvard Business Review, 67 (1), 133–139.

Hill, C. W., Hitt, A. M., Hoskisson, E. R. (1992). Cooperative versus competitive structures in related and unrelated diversified firms. Organization Science, 3, 501–521.

Homans, G. C. (1950). The Human Group. Harcourt, Brace, and world, New York.

Khanna, T., Gulati, R., Nohria, N. (1998). Dynamics of learning alliance: Competition, cooperation, and relative scope. Strategic Management Journal, 19, 193–210.

Kilduff, M. (1990). The interpersonal structure of decision-making: A social comparison approach to organizational choice. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 47, 270–288.

Knott A. (2003). The organizational routines factor market paradox. Strategic Management Journal, Special Issue, 24, 929–943.

Kogut, B., Zander, U. (1992). Knowledge of the firm, combinative capacities and the replication of technology. Organization Science, 3, 383–397.

Kogut, B., Zander, U. (1996). What firms do? Coordination, identity and learning. Organization Science, 7(5), 502–518.

Krackhardt, D. (1990). Assessing the political landscape: Structure, cognition, and power in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 342–369.

Lado, A. A., Boyd, G. N., Hanlon. C. S. (1997). Competition, cooperation, and search for economic rents: A syncretic model. Academy Management Review, 22, 110–141.

Lin, L. H., Geng, X. J., Whinston, A. B. (2005). A sender-receiver framework for knowledge transfer. MIS Quarterly, 29 (2), 197–219.

Madhok, A. (1996). The organization of economic activity: Transaction costs, firm capabilities, and the nature of governance. Organization Science, 7, 577–590.

Minbaeva, D. B., Michailova, S. (2004). Knowledge transfer and expatriation in multinational corporations: The role of disseminative capacity. Employee Relations, 26 (6), 663–679.

Nickerson, J. A., Zenger, T. R. (2004). A knowledge-based Theory of the Firm: The problem solving perspective. Organization Science, 15 (6), 617–632.

Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5, 14–37.

Oliver, P. E., Marwell, G. (1988). The paradox of group size in collective action: A Theory of the Critical Mass. American Sociology Review, 53, 1–8.

Palmer, J., Richards, I. (1999). Get knitted: Network behaviour in the new economy. The Journal of Knowledge Management, 3 (3), 191–202.

Polanyi, M. (1966). The Tacit Dimension. Doubleday & Co: Garden City, NY.

Powell, W. W. (1990). Neither market nor hierarchy: Network forms of organization. Research on Organizational Behaviour, 12, 295–336.

Reagan, R., McEvily, B. (2003). Network structure and knowledge transfer: The effects of cohesion and range. Administrative Science Quarterly 48, 240–267.

Spender, J. C., Grant, M. R. (1996). Knowledge and the firm: Overview. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 5–9.

Szulanski, G. (1996). Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within firm. Strategic Management Journal Winter Special Issue, 17, 27–43.

Tang, F. (2011). Knowledge transfer in intra-organizational networks, system Research and Behavioural Science, 28, 270–282.

Tang, F., Xi, Y., Ma, J. (2006). Estimating the effect of organizational structure on knowledge transfer: A neural network approach. Expert Systems with Applications, 30, 796–800.

Tsai, W. (2002). Social Structure of “Coopetition” Within a Multiunit Organization: Coordination, Competition and Intraorganizational knowledge sharing. Organization Science, 13 (2), 179–190.

Tsai, W., Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital and value creation: The role of intrafirm networks. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 464–476.

Winter, S. (1987). Knowledge and competency as strategic assets. The Competitive Challenge. Teece D. (ed.). Ballinger: Cambridge, MA. 159–184.

Wrong, D. H. (1968). Some problems in defining social power. American Journal of Sociology, 73, 673–681.

Zander, U., Kogut, B. (1995). Knowledge and the speed of the transfer and imitation of organizational capabilities: An empirical test. Organization Science, 6 (1), 76–92.




How to Cite

Chauhan, H., & Kalkis, H. (2022). Managing Knowledge Transfer and Sharing within Intra-Organizational Structure. Humanities and Social Sciences Latvia, 30(1, 2), 83–92.