Mangrove ecosystem in Asia: review and synthesis of ecosystem services and economic valuation methods
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22364/eeb.22.06Keywords:
Asia, economic valuation methods, ecosystem services, mangrove ecosystemsAbstract
Mangroves provide multiple ecological and socioeconomic benefits in both terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems; however, little is known about their benefits to humans. This study presents a systematic synthesis of the ecosystem services (ESs) and economic valuation methods (EVMs) of mangrove ecosystems in Asia. A total of 28 studies published from 12 countries encompassing 194 observations were reviewed and included in the analysis using Publish or Perish Software. Results revealed that the majority of the mangrove forests in Asia host the genera Rhizophora and Avicennia spp. in the largest proportion, indicating that these genera contribute significantly to mangrove ESs. Market price and factor income methods were the most frequently used EVMs with 96 and 66 value estimates, respectively. Provisioning ecosystem services were valued the most often among ESs types. Moreover, regarding the values of specific ESs, the median values of those that belong to regulating ecosystem services were the highest, specifically erosion prevention (5833.22 $ ha–1 year–1) and moderation of extreme events (3633.69 $ ha–1 year ). Considering contemporary protection and conservation measures, research studies on mangrove ESs and EVMs can be further improved through broader geographic area coverage and improved economic assessment of the rarely studied ESs. Overall, the findings recommend focusing on these gaps, particularly encouraging institutions and policymakers to acknowledge the undervalued ecological and socioeconomic values of mangrove ecosystem services.
References
Anderson D.A. 2019. Environmental Economics and Natural Resource Management. Routledge.
Barbier E.B., Baumgärtner S., Chopra K., Costello C., Duraiappah A., Hassan R., Kinzig A., Lehman M., Pascual U., Polasky S., and Perrings C. 2009. The valuation of ecosystem services In: Naeem S., Bunker, D., Hector, A., Loreau M., Perrings C. (Eds.) Biodiversity, Ecosystem Functioning, and Human Wellbeing: An Ecological and Economic Perspective. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 248–262.
Barbier E.B., Hacker S.D., Kennedy C., Koch E.W., Stier A.C., Silliman B.R. 2011. The value of estuarine and coastal ecosystem services. Ecol. Monogr. 81: 169–193.
Beck M., Lange G. 2017. Mighty Mangroves of the Philippines: Valuing Wetland Benefits for Risk Reduction and Conservation. World Bank Blogs.
Birch A. 2020. Why Are Mangroves Important? The Nature Conservancy.
Bimrah K., Dasgupta R., Hashimoto S., Saizen I., Dhyani S. 2022. Ecosystem services of mangroves: A systematic review and synthesis of contemporary scientific literature. Sustainability 14: 12051.
Brander L.M., Florax R.J., Vermaat J.E. 2006. The empirics of wetland valuation: a comprehensive summary and a meta-analysis of the literature. Environ. Resour. Econ. 33, 223–250.
Cochard R. 2017. Coastal water pollution and its potential mitigation by vegetated wetlands: An overview of issues in Southeast Asia. In: Shivakoti G.P., Pradhan U., Helmi (Eds.) Redefining Diversity & Dynamics of Natural Resources Management in Asia. Vol. 1. Elsevier, pp. 189–230.
Chow J. 2018. Mangrove management for climate change adaptation and sustainable development in coastal zones. J. Sust. Forestry 37: 139–156.
Curnick D.J., Pettorelli N., Amir A.A., Balke T., Barbier E.B., Crooks S., Dahdouh-Guebas F., Duncan C., Endsor C., Friess D.A., Quarto A., Zimmer M., Lee S.Y. 2019. The value of small mangrove patches. Science 363: 239–239.
De Groot R.S., Wilson M.A., Boumans R.M.J. 2002. A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecol. Econ. 41: 393–408.
Ecoviva. 2016. Seven Reasons Mangroves Matter. EcoViva.
FAO-UN. 2021. Nutrition Requirements. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
Folkersen M.V. 2018. Ecosystem valuation: Changing discourse in a time of climate change. Ecosyst. Serv. 29: 1–12.
George O. 2018. Natural resource use dilemma: a review of effects of population growth on natural resources in Kenya. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Nat. Resour. 13: 555867.
Getzner M., Islam M. S. 2020. Ecosystem services of mangrove forests: results of a meta-analysis of economic values. Int. J. Environ. Res. Publ. Health 17: 5830.
Haab T.C., McConnell K.E. 2002. Valuing Environmental and Natural Resources: The Econometrics of Non-Market Valuation. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Haines-Young R., Potschin-Young M. 2018. Revision of the common international classification for ecosystem services (CICES V5. 1): a policy brief. One Ecosyst. 3: e27108.
Harini R. 2019. Economic valuation of mangrove management in Kulon Progo Regency. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 256: 012036.
Himes-Cornell A., Pendleton L., Atiyah P. 2018. Valuing ecosystem services from blue forests: A systematic review of the valuation of salt marshes, seagrass beds and mangrove forests. Ecosyst. Serv. 30: 36–48.
Hensher D.A., Rose, J.M., Greene W.H. 2005. Applied Choice Analysis: A Primer. Cambridge University Press.
Hussen A. 2000. Principles of Environmental Economics. Routledge.
IUCN. 2010. Mangrove Forests in Worldwide Decline. International Union for Conservation of Nature - IUCN.
Kaval P. 2010. A Summary of Ecosystem Service Economic Valuation Methods and Recommendations for Future Studies. University of Waikato, Hamilton, 13 p.
Kumar P. 2012. The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Ecological and Economic Foundations. Routledge.
Layke C., Mapendembe A., Brown C., Walpole M., Winn J. 2012. Indicators from the global and sub-global millennium ecosystem assessments: An analysis and next steps. Ecol. Indic. 17: 77–87.
Lau J.D., Hicks C.C., Gurney G.G., Cinner J.E. 2019. What matters to whom and why? Understanding the importance of coastal ecosystem services in developing coastal communities. Ecosyst. Serv. 35: 219–230.
Liiri M., Setälä H., Haimi J., Pennanen T., Fritze, H. 2002. Soil processes are not influenced by the functional complexity of soil decomposer food webs under disturbance. Soil Biol. Biochem. 34: 1009–1020.
Liekens I., De Nocker L., Broekx S., Aertsens J., Markandya A. 2013. Ecosystem services and their monetary value. In: Jacobs S., Keune H., Dendoncker N. (Eds.) Ecosystem Services: Global Issues, Local Practices. Elsevier, pp. 13-28.
Locatelli T., Binet T., Kairo J. G., King L., Madden S., Patenaude G., Huxham M. 2014. Turning the tide: how blue carbon and payments for ecosystem services (PES) might help save mangrove forests. Ambio 43: 981–995.
Martins C.M.R., Lima I.A.P. 2021. The economic valuation of ecosystem services: A review. Sustainability 13: 2847.
Maynard S., Karki M. 2022. Ecosystem Services. International Union for Conservation of Nature.
Ouzzani M., Hammady H., Fedorowicz Z., Elmagarmid A. 2016. Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Syst. Rev. 5: 210.
Page M.J., McKenzie J.E., Bossuyt P.M., Boutron I., Hoffmann T.C., Mulrow C.D., Moher D. 2021. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Int. J. Surg. 88: 105906.
Patterson M.G. 2002. Ecological production-based pricing of biosphere processes. Ecol. Econ. 41: 457–478.
Pham H.T., Nguyen T.H.H., Mai S.T. 2021. Ecological valuation and ecosystem services of mangroves. In: Rastogi R.P., Phulwaria M., Gupta D.K. (Eds.) Mangroves: Ecology, Biodiversity and Management. Springer, Singapore, pp. 439-454.
Philip L.J., MacMillan D.C. 2005. Exploring values, context and perceptions in contingent valuation studies: the CV market stall technique and willingness to pay for wildlife conservation. J. Environ. Plan. Manage. 48: 257–274.
Pattanayak S.K., Kramer R.A. 2001. Worth of watersheds: a producer surplus approach for valuing drought mitigation in Eastern Indonesia. Environ. Devel. Econ. 6: 123–146.
Quevedo J.M., Uchiyama Y., Lukman K.M., Kohsaka R. 2021. Are municipalities ready for integrating blue carbon concepts? Content analysis of coastal management plans in the Philippines. Coastal Manage. 49: 334–-355.
Raihan A. 2023. A review on the integrative approach for economic valuation of forest ecosystem services. J. Environ. Sci. Econ. 2: 1–18.
Rizal A., Sahidin A. 2018. Economic value estimation of mangrove ecosystems in Indonesia. Biodiv. Int. J. 2: 00051.
Sacramento N.J.J., Geges D. 2019. Community livelihood recovery: experiences from 2006 Guimaras oil spill in the Philippines. J. Human Ecol. 8: 50–67.
Salem M.E., Mercer E. 2012. The economic value of mangroves: a meta-analysis. Sustainability 4: 359–383.
Street D.J., Burgess L. 2007. The Construction of Optimal State Choice Experiments: Theory and Methods. Wiley-Interscience.
Spash C.L. 2008. Deliberative monetary valuation (DMV) and evidence for a new theory of value. Land Econ. 84: 469–488.
Talukdar S., Singha P., Mahato S., Praveen B., Rahman A. 2020. Dynamics of ecosystem services (ESs) in response to land use land cover (LU/LC) changes in the lower Gangetic plain of India. Ecol. Indic. 112: 106121.
The Nature Conservancy. 2018. Global Assessments of Mangrove Losses and Degradation. International Union for Conservation of Nature- IUCN.
TEEB. 2012. The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity in Local and Regional Policy and Management. Wittmer H., Gundimeda H. (Eds.) Earthscan, London and Washington.
UN Environment. 2018. UN Environment Annual Report 2017. UNEP - UN Environment Programme.
UNEP. 2014. The Importance of Mangroves to People: A Call to Action. van Bochove, J., Sullivan, E., Nakamura, T. (Eds). United Nations Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre, Cambridge. 128 p.
Van Oudenhoven A.P.E., Petz K., Alkemade R., Hein L., de Groot R.S. 2012. Framework for systematic indicator selection to assess effects of land management. on ecosystem services. Ecol. Indic. 21: 110– 122.
Vo Q.T., Kuenzer C., Vo Q.M., Moder F., Oppelt N. 2012. Review of valuation methods for mangrove ecosystem services. Ecol. Indic. 23: 431–446.
Woodward R.T., Wui Y.S. 2001. The economic value of wetland services: a meta-analysis. Ecol. Econ. 37: 257–270.
Whiting P., Savović J., Higgins J.P., Caldwell D.M., Reeves B.C., Shea B., Churchill R. 2016. ROBIS: a new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed. J. Clin. Epidem. 69: 225–234.
Wilson M.A., Howarth R.B. 2002. Valuation techniques for achieving social fairness in the distribution of ecosystem services. Ecol. Econ. 41: 431–434.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 University of LatviaThis is an open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access. Author(s) of the published papers retain copyright, the papers are made freely available for non-commercial purposes, allowing download, reuse, reprint and distribution of the material as long as the original authors and the source are cited. This license is equivalent to the CC BY-NC-ND.
